Nah,have tried all those and still not happening,the occasional one but it's like 1 out of every 10...this thing worked so much better 18 months ago,it's just not listening anymore which kind've defeats the object of using it.
Am trying to create some images of a blonde woman with very short hair / short cropped back & sides (ala Brigitte Nielsen)...have tried all sorts of prompts to make this as clear as I can but it keeps on giving me long shoulder length hair...anyone got any advice or is this thing just not listening?
I know...I was barely off of this site 12 months ago,now i've almost forgotten it exists since that stupid update 6 months ago..shame as it was so good before.
Still trying to figure out why this new version can't recognise famous faces?..have just tried asking for Dolly Parton..it obviously knows who i'm on about as the outfit & hairstyle are exactly like hers (without any prompts from me btw)...but I keep on getting the same female face that keeps appearing on every person i'm trying to recreate,no matter how much facial detail I put in...is there some sort of fault with this new version?..or is there something blocking users from getting the results they want...How did the old version know how to create images of anyone famous (or even not that famous)..did it search the internet & come up with suggestions?...can't this new version do that?
Anyone know what the issue is with this site at the moment...been trying to generate text from image uploads for a few days but keep getting an error message.
Here's hoping...just feels like it's gone beyond backwards on the celeb side of things...have tried & tried to recreate the faces i'm after but as I said previously,just keep on getting the same female face time after time (wish i'd stocked up on creating on the previous version)...the site is great for creating random images but has become pretty much useless if you're tying to create images "based" on famous faces (even obscure actors).
So how come so many people on here say it's "not legal" whenever anyone mentions it?...Ok,so hopefully sooner rather than later this updated version will get back to being somewhere as good as it used to be...?
Seems daft if there's some sort of ban on using/recognising "celebrity" faces..inevitable that at some point they'll find their way back onto the system so why not just put it back to how it was before this wretched update.
In the meantime how many who loved the old version are going to give up on this new version - the incredibly slow waiting speeds for images to generate & over complicated way of using this version (compared to the simplicity of the previous version) are very off putting...am I better off coming back in 6 months (or longer)...?
Fair enough - I hate to complain but for me the site was perfect as it was - if in 6 months it's as good as it was then great - but it's a long time to wait though to get back to where we were!
Yes but it's not just the fact that it no longer recognises "celebs",it's the fact that some of the old styles are nothing like they were - tintin comic,franco/belgian comic,50s enamel sign,vintage comic,vintage pulp art etc etc are now Nothing like they were or are anywhere near as good..how is this progress?..surely these styles should've stayed as they were even if there is some sort of new engine running this site.
Personally speaking It's become useless to me..whether that will change in 6 months,who knows?..just feels like it's gone backwards..what happens if we all get used to this version then he decides to "upgrade" it again & we're back to square one?..sometimes new isn't always better.
Nah,have tried all those and still not happening,the occasional one but it's like 1 out of every 10...this thing worked so much better 18 months ago,it's just not listening anymore which kind've defeats the object of using it.
Am trying to create some images of a blonde woman with very short hair / short cropped back & sides (ala Brigitte Nielsen)...have tried all sorts of prompts to make this as clear as I can but it keeps on giving me long shoulder length hair...anyone got any advice or is this thing just not listening?
Best of luck..it would be unbelievably useful going forward.
I just wish we all had the choice of the 2024 version or the 2025 version...I know which I preferred.
I know...I was barely off of this site 12 months ago,now i've almost forgotten it exists since that stupid update 6 months ago..shame as it was so good before.
Still trying to figure out why this new version can't recognise famous faces?..have just tried asking for Dolly Parton..it obviously knows who i'm on about as the outfit & hairstyle are exactly like hers (without any prompts from me btw)...but I keep on getting the same female face that keeps appearing on every person i'm trying to recreate,no matter how much facial detail I put in...is there some sort of fault with this new version?..or is there something blocking users from getting the results they want...How did the old version know how to create images of anyone famous (or even not that famous)..did it search the internet & come up with suggestions?...can't this new version do that?
Anyone know what the issue is with this site at the moment...been trying to generate text from image uploads for a few days but keep getting an error message.
Nice work.
Here's hoping...just feels like it's gone beyond backwards on the celeb side of things...have tried & tried to recreate the faces i'm after but as I said previously,just keep on getting the same female face time after time (wish i'd stocked up on creating on the previous version)...the site is great for creating random images but has become pretty much useless if you're tying to create images "based" on famous faces (even obscure actors).
So how come so many people on here say it's "not legal" whenever anyone mentions it?...Ok,so hopefully sooner rather than later this updated version will get back to being somewhere as good as it used to be...?
Agree,I find some of the responses to fans of the old version quite condescending & ignorant...not very classy.
Here here...the new version is a poor relation of the old...but we seem to be stuck with it.
Not according to the stats on the bottom right of the page.
Seems daft if there's some sort of ban on using/recognising "celebrity" faces..inevitable that at some point they'll find their way back onto the system so why not just put it back to how it was before this wretched update.
In the meantime how many who loved the old version are going to give up on this new version - the incredibly slow waiting speeds for images to generate & over complicated way of using this version (compared to the simplicity of the previous version) are very off putting...am I better off coming back in 6 months (or longer)...?
Fair enough - I hate to complain but for me the site was perfect as it was - if in 6 months it's as good as it was then great - but it's a long time to wait though to get back to where we were!
Yes but it's not just the fact that it no longer recognises "celebs",it's the fact that some of the old styles are nothing like they were - tintin comic,franco/belgian comic,50s enamel sign,vintage comic,vintage pulp art etc etc are now Nothing like they were or are anywhere near as good..how is this progress?..surely these styles should've stayed as they were even if there is some sort of new engine running this site.
Personally speaking It's become useless to me..whether that will change in 6 months,who knows?..just feels like it's gone backwards..what happens if we all get used to this version then he decides to "upgrade" it again & we're back to square one?..sometimes new isn't always better.
Ok,but what is the reason for this update if it's putting us all back who knows how many months..all seems a bit daft to say the least.
"Months" though!!!....how is this an improvement?...seems like we've gone so far backwards.