Trump, Giuliani, Meadows are unindicted co-conspirators in Michigan fake elector case, hearing reveals

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-giuliani-meadows-unindicted-conspirators-michigan-fake-elector/story?id=109578220

364 points · 19 comments · view on lemmy.world

19 Comments

Badeendje@lemmy.world · 78 pts · 2y (6 replies)

So, they roll up all the pawns, lock them into a story, test your trial strategy, get them convicted.

Once done, use the lineup to charge other not yet charged co-conspirators.

With a proven fact as a matter of law (that there was election interference) due to the past trials..

So then prosecution only has to prove if the defendents indeed where co-conspirators.

NegativeInf@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 2y

The DOJ uses this one neat trick that Defense Attorneys don't want you to know!

18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y

Well that's fun!

youngGoku@lemmy.world · -5 pts · 2y (3 replies)

Hopefully Trump doesn't get elected because then none of this will matter when he pardons himself.

ripcord@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 2y

Once again, he can't pardon state charges.

MNByChoice@midwest.social · 6 pts · 2y

Can't pardon state level convictions. Has to wait for the governor.

Kecessa@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 2y

Which has yet to be tried and decided if legal

Pronell@lemmy.world · 42 pts · 2y (10 replies)

You love to see it.

Riccosuave@lemmy.world · 52 pts · 2y (9 replies)

I'd rather they were indicted co-conspirators, but I'll take what I can get I suppose.

ForestOrca@kbin.social · 15 pts · 2y (7 replies)

I'll take indicted co-conspirators, for all 3.

EdibleFriend@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 2y (3 replies)

I'll take them being punched in the cock on live television

some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org · 4 pts · 2y

RutabagaRudy might just enjoy it, so…

GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y

Like Mario squishing a Goomba.

Ersatz86@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y

I lol’d

Empricorn@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 2y (2 replies)

Are we repeating here now? Then I would prefer if all three were indicted co-conspirators!

Riccosuave@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Are we repeating here now?

Well then I second your preference seconding my preference, which is also your preference 🙃😅😉

Empricorn@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 2y

I would have preferred to not get a headache.

fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com · 2 pts · 2y

I wouldn't. Better to test strategy low, then once interference is proved to exist, try the others as coconspirators so you have less to prove in that trial.

some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org · 25 pts · 2y

Treasonous fucks.