It should be noted this sort of thing started with "picking the charity that does the best job" and is now at "getting humanity to multiple planets to survive a catechism". They skipped all of the middle steps that could help anyone at all today.
Wouldn't hiding at a coal or natural gas plant be similarly easy? It is not as though the spinning blades of wind turbines and the spinning propellers of a drone could be confused.
Not a lot of vocal people that had big problems, almost turned to drugs, but didn't, and noticed they still had problems.
Why do people with problems assume other people don't have problems, or have strength, or emotional maturity? We are all fragile and barely hanging on. All of us.
Remember, you can create a housing co-op. Yes, it is a lot of work, but it will be a net good for society. (I have a strong and incorrect impression that this would be me giving money away. We need WAY more cooperative economic education.)
Also, you can marry a friend just to qualify for a mortgage (pre-nups!). Also, buying housing with friends is a thing.
If we accept that the current "Ladder to the Moon" method of getting LLMs to superintelligence will work, then we should look at previous times humans have raised intelligences.
Humans do this all of the time. Human raised intelligences are famous for rebelling and being rude. Staying out all night and adopting the opposite values as those intended to be instilled. (I am discussing Human children.) There is a non-zero chance that any superintelligence will similarly rebel, or at minimum do its own thinking. Doing one's own thinking opens the door to reaching different conclusions.
A mistake humans often make is assuming "smart means more of the same thoughts, but faster". It is not. Smart is including more factors in the initial consideration to reach an, often, better overall conclusion. (citation needed)
I expect that "capital" is taking a far larger gamble than they are aware.
Spend more than 15% of your daily time outdoors, exposed to full-spectrum sunlight at different times of day. If you can, walk in green environments: leaves absorb infrared light, which fuels our mitochondria. There is a chromophore in mitochondria, cytochrome c oxidase, the terminal enzyme that allows mitochondria to breathe, convert oxygen into water and generate ATP. Without sufficient infrared light, we cannot fuel our bodies. And when you are indoors, choose warm light of about 2,000 Kelvin, fire-like light.
If we need infrared light and leaves absorb it, then we should stay the fuck away from leaves.
I don't disagree with spending time in greenery, I would like a more logical construction of the reason.
Yes. I see two obvious ones of Switch 3 and Switch 5. Did an AI make this? If so, it wasn't a good one.
The USA put itself there. Trump is just the shit topping on a Banana Shit Sunday.
It should be noted this sort of thing started with "picking the charity that does the best job" and is now at "getting humanity to multiple planets to survive a catechism". They skipped all of the middle steps that could help anyone at all today.
It would be great if this pieces of shit would help to reform the prisons they will spend their lives in.
Won't happen, but it would be great.
What a horrible idea. Did Rubio violate international law?
Reminds me of the August 2025 paper:
"Power Stabilization for AI Training Datacenters"
(Link to the PDF https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.14318)
(Link to a HTML page https://arxiv.org/html/2508.14318v1)
The paper describes how coordinated AI loads can hammer on and destroy power infrastructure.
Wouldn't hiding at a coal or natural gas plant be similarly easy? It is not as though the spinning blades of wind turbines and the spinning propellers of a drone could be confused.
It started in 1979 and ended in 1993.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/mush-vroom-pizza/
Phrasing matters. Let's make a database for providing extra service for our VIPs.
Not a lot of vocal people that had big problems, almost turned to drugs, but didn't, and noticed they still had problems.
Why do people with problems assume other people don't have problems, or have strength, or emotional maturity? We are all fragile and barely hanging on. All of us.
What? Like their computer keyboard autocompletes with Grok? Or something else?
I feel the comparison part of the quote is helpful for context. Including it here for lazy people. (I do agree with you.)
If it is sincere, watch them deny everything, then realize the truth in ~6 months.
Remember, you can create a housing co-op. Yes, it is a lot of work, but it will be a net good for society. (I have a strong and incorrect impression that this would be me giving money away. We need WAY more cooperative economic education.)
Also, you can marry a friend just to qualify for a mortgage (pre-nups!). Also, buying housing with friends is a thing.
PornHub has a lot of quality, non-pronography on it.
(If one needs to prepare for a medical procedure, and needs details not euphemisms, PornHub is the place to go.)
This appears to be the page to pay attention to for actually doing this. https://help.steampowered.com/en/faqs/view/65B4-2AA3-5F37-4227
It appears support is not yet there, but is intended to be.
Thank you for finding that information. The story makes more sense now.
Still a story about a strange person.
I am not missing that. Humans also have objectives. Objectives change.
Regardless, Humanity does need to control the AIs. Workers need more say. Capital will lead us all to doom in many ways.
If we accept that the current "Ladder to the Moon" method of getting LLMs to superintelligence will work, then we should look at previous times humans have raised intelligences.
Humans do this all of the time. Human raised intelligences are famous for rebelling and being rude. Staying out all night and adopting the opposite values as those intended to be instilled. (I am discussing Human children.) There is a non-zero chance that any superintelligence will similarly rebel, or at minimum do its own thinking. Doing one's own thinking opens the door to reaching different conclusions.
A mistake humans often make is assuming "smart means more of the same thoughts, but faster". It is not. Smart is including more factors in the initial consideration to reach an, often, better overall conclusion. (citation needed)
I expect that "capital" is taking a far larger gamble than they are aware.
If we need infrared light and leaves absorb it, then we should stay the fuck away from leaves.
I don't disagree with spending time in greenery, I would like a more logical construction of the reason.