David McBride vs Goliath in a nutshell

-> Alt text:

David vs Goliath in a nutshell:

Government: 'he stole [newspeak for copied] information but we can't tell you what it is, so we took it off his lawyers and put it in a safe. We'll all refer to it as the docs in the safe.'

Judiciary: 'oh, ok, np!'

Defence Department Whistleblower: 'Those docs showed what I believed to be leadership misconduct. I have no defence now; I plead guilty.'

6 months later...

Government: 'Please jail him with non-parole period'

Judiciary: 'lemme think about this for another week 🤔'

-> end alt-text

-> https://twitter.com/BeeDemocracy/status/1787773353438413019

40 points · 7 comments · view on lemmy.world

7 Comments

BeeDemocracy@sh.itjust.works · 21 pts · 2y (4 replies)

What I don't understand is how the case wasn't thrown out by the justice when he wasn't allowed to see the docs that were then put in the safe. THIS IS NOT A FAIR TRIAL. The defendent is prevented from presenting potentially exculpatory evidence, even to a closed court!

Ringmasterincestuous@aussie.zone · 11 pts · 2y (1 reply)

🦘

unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 2y (1 reply)
[ removed ]
BeeDemocracy@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 2y

That's certainly a big part of it.

Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone · 5 pts · 2y (2 replies)

Coming in hot raring to go from Twitter! I like it. Welcome! :)

BeeDemocracy@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 2y

Thanks!

oahi@aussie.zone · -1 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 2y

Yep, totally evil authoritarianism. No excuses, this is a clear act of tyranny.