I used to have trust in the peer review process, thinking this is why it takes months or years for a paper to get published. Are you telling me it’s not real?
Hell, the fact that any articles have been published with the openAI "I can't provide up-to-date info" means that shit's not getting read properly, overall.
11 Comments
gi1242@lemmy.world · 114 pts · 2y
bleistift2@feddit.de · 41 pts · 2y
I used to have trust in the peer review process, thinking this is why it takes months or years for a paper to get published. Are you telling me it’s not real?
gi1242@lemmy.world · 59 pts · 2y
FinalRemix@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 2y
Hell, the fact that any articles have been published with the openAI "I can't provide up-to-date info" means that shit's not getting read properly, overall.
blurg@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y
Though errors are somewhat monitored by Retraction Watch.
wewbull@feddit.uk · 9 pts · 2y
Sounds like you already worked it out.
pennomi@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y
max@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 36 pts · 2y
The value of a scientists, how funny this world is
scytale@lemm.ee · 15 pts · 2y
That expression is hilarious. What’s the name of the template?
DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz · 14 pts · 2y
It's from the movie Monster House
Mikufan@ani.social · 7 pts · 2y
Why Don't make your own journal with free distribution?
fossilesque@mander.xyz · 25 pts · 2y
flyos@jlai.lu · 14 pts · 2y
Some people did, look up the Peer Community Journal. Backed up by more and more organisations.
gi1242@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 2y
Mikufan@ani.social · 12 pts · 2y
Kinda sad that this is necessary or seen as necessary
OpenStars@discuss.online · 7 pts · 2y
In so many more ways than one... :-(