“Revise generically: [manifesto]” (certainly not the best prompt)
Folks seem to like Ollama per HackerNews threads: in a coding context here:
Not using Codestral (yet) but check out Continue.dev[1] with Ollama[2] running llama3:latest and starcoder2:3b. It gives you a locally running chat and edit via llama3 and autocomplete via starcoder2.
It's not perfect but it's getting better and better.
While forensic linguistics is pretty cool, the Unabomber was caught because they released his manifesto and his brother’s wife and brother recognized the unusual phrasing such as ‘Eat your cake and have it too’.
If an author has a large amount of known works then it’s not too difficult to identify other writings by that same author. But if the author does not have a large body of writing that is known to come from that individual, then the best we can do is determine an approximate age and geographic location where the Individual grew up, and that’s only when the unidentified writing is large enough, like in the case of the Unabomber where his manifesto was 30k words.
Best of misinformation. The Unabomber was caught because the person that recognized the writing was his own family members. What the hell is this revisionist BS?
Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !bestoflemmy@lemmy.world
My second statement is certainly not comprehensive and rather offhand. Its just we have a ton of pattern matching behavior thats been optimized. Sometimes you may read things about it in why we see faces in everything and why we like certain sounds such that we have music and such.
yeah its just belief thought really. Its made me think on it more and its sorta a chicken and egg thing. like the whole basic things with cells. attracted to beneficial things like food and repulsed by dangerous things. so recognition becomes important but maybe just the like dislike is the thing and not the aparatus to identify it. shrug
16 Comments
lvxferre@mander.xyz · 48 pts · 2y
VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 25 pts · 2y
Conversely, you can now have your manifesto written by a locally run LLM.
brbposting@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 2y
“Revise generically: [manifesto]” (certainly not the best prompt)
Folks seem to like Ollama per HackerNews threads: in a coding context here:
Please no unabombing though
Oh wow he wrote a 35k word manifesto… feel like that’s so rare you’d still stand a solid chance at being identified somehow.
lvxferre@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 2y
UmeU@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 2y
While forensic linguistics is pretty cool, the Unabomber was caught because they released his manifesto and his brother’s wife and brother recognized the unusual phrasing such as ‘Eat your cake and have it too’.
If an author has a large amount of known works then it’s not too difficult to identify other writings by that same author. But if the author does not have a large body of writing that is known to come from that individual, then the best we can do is determine an approximate age and geographic location where the Individual grew up, and that’s only when the unidentified writing is large enough, like in the case of the Unabomber where his manifesto was 30k words.
lvxferre@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 2y
intensely_human@lemm.ee · 0 pts · 2y
Additional signal is not noise
LodeMike@lemmy.today · 6 pts · 2y
Is there a best of on Lemmy
StaticFalconar@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y
Best of misinformation. The Unabomber was caught because the person that recognized the writing was his own family members. What the hell is this revisionist BS?
kionite231@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 2y
https://lemmy.ca/c/bestoflemmy@lemmy.world
CommunityLinkFixer@lemmings.world · 4 pts · 2y
Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !bestoflemmy@lemmy.world
AtariDump@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y
You can’t eat your cake and have it too.
Pantoffel@feddit.de · 2 pts · 2y
Let's see how well this quote ages as subscription services become ubiquitous.
AtariDump@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y
lvxferre@mander.xyz · 0 pts · 2y
HubertManne@kbin.social · 1 pts · 2y
I don't believe they are intelligent now but I do believe we evolved as basically pattern matching machines.
lvxferre@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 2y
intensely_human@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 2y
How do you define intelligent here, if it’s not what LLMs can do? What’s something an “intelligent” text generator can do that an LLM cannot?
lvxferre@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 2y
lvxferre@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 2y
HubertManne@kbin.social · 1 pts · 2y
My second statement is certainly not comprehensive and rather offhand. Its just we have a ton of pattern matching behavior thats been optimized. Sometimes you may read things about it in why we see faces in everything and why we like certain sounds such that we have music and such.
lvxferre@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 2y
HubertManne@kbin.social · 2 pts · 2y
yeah its just belief thought really. Its made me think on it more and its sorta a chicken and egg thing. like the whole basic things with cells. attracted to beneficial things like food and repulsed by dangerous things. so recognition becomes important but maybe just the like dislike is the thing and not the aparatus to identify it. shrug
SpookyCoffee@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y
It’s one of the videos on his channel, that I didn’t watch on purpose. It’s just depressing thinking about it.