At least being young in USA, made friends on public transit!
As with all interactions like that (captive audience essentially), utmost care is required, but want to dissuade notion it’s not possible or not permissible, even in a country with illness & weapons.
Is the simplest possible of reading of this correct, “it makes sense to filter my weird instance“? Or maybe it was just a short way to reply to something that felt like a gotcha since nobody likes to feel the way a gotcha makes us feel (regardless of validity)?
Are you forced to use it for work? I’m thinking folks who love AI and/or use it daily will be in the best position to recognize the Claudisms they’ve seen hundreds and even thousands of times.
::: spoiler Oh and get this,
apparently that model loves to say “load bearing” and there was a commenter who picked that phrase up from their colleagues writing and started using it in their speech. They were asked why they were talking like Claude! They strongly dislike AI and never used it and were caught totally off guard. (Stinky situation, now that I mention it it’d make me want to only borrow phrases from pre-2022 books or something.)
Are some allegedly ALPR+car identification (including dents and “convoys”, associated vehicles) only while others (like some capturing walking paths) do the faces + audio & all?
In that example, it sounds like the train is responsible for driving forward, driving in reverse and stopping.
The train company would want to ensure a human has agreed in writing to be held accountable for foreseeable failures of the train driving system.
Sharing my definitions, more or less, in red:
The thing that should be impossible is for the train company to hire the owner’s drunk cousin to build a self driving train system, and when people get hurt and the company is taken to court, the company is allowed to apologize + blame software + do business as usual w/o fine/penalties.
I’m thinking even at the time enough stuff was (successfully, safely) automated that they would’ve agreed.
You want everyone at your company to know that if they get dragged in front of a judge, pointing fingers at silicon will not prove a winning strategy. Hence, a computer must never make a management decision!
Imagine the lines at self checkout for ~$10(+) off on decent-sized carts
You are incredibly rare.
tl;dr this consummate professional, well rounded and frugal with deep technical skills, NEEDS OUR DOUGH! 💳🪙 And no one will spend it more carefully.
No wonder reliability and speed are immaculate the way the captain runs the ship, shoestring budget be darned. Thank you so much, Dude.
Either got the insight or ya don’t
You got it :)
Oh then the only gotcha is:
I gotcha! :)
At least being young in USA, made friends on public transit!
As with all interactions like that (captive audience essentially), utmost care is required, but want to dissuade notion it’s not possible or not permissible, even in a country with illness & weapons.
No shade (promise):
Is the simplest possible of reading of this correct, “it makes sense to filter my weird instance“? Or maybe it was just a short way to reply to something that felt like a gotcha since nobody likes to feel the way a gotcha makes us feel (regardless of validity)?
(I could be missing something)
Lotta the AI hate makes a lotta sense!
Are you forced to use it for work? I’m thinking folks who love AI and/or use it daily will be in the best position to recognize the Claudisms they’ve seen hundreds and even thousands of times.
::: spoiler Oh and get this,
apparently that model loves to say “load bearing” and there was a commenter who picked that phrase up from their colleagues writing and started using it in their speech. They were asked why they were talking like Claude! They strongly dislike AI and never used it and were caught totally off guard. (Stinky situation, now that I mention it it’d make me want to only borrow phrases from pre-2022 books or something.)
:::
Are some allegedly ALPR+car identification (including dents and “convoys”, associated vehicles) only while others (like some capturing walking paths) do the faces + audio & all?
Behold, Talon
https://youtu.be/0ZZb12Qp6-0?t=75
Epic (usually disabled) coders might learn a system like this!
Beaver?
Their hidden rear door release design should literally be an imprisonable crime
I did!! :D
I wonderrr how our identification success rates compare
Tragic m&miscarriage of proper statistical analysis
TIL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Septic_drain_field
I wonder how good we are at distinguishing those Chris actors compared to distinguishing the actors in the OP.
Haha thanks Wiki, there’s a name:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_Chrises
Wait what!!
In that example, it sounds like the train is responsible for driving forward, driving in reverse and stopping.
The train company would want to ensure a human has agreed in writing to be held accountable for foreseeable failures of the train driving system.
Sharing my definitions, more or less, in red:
The thing that should be impossible is for the train company to hire the owner’s drunk cousin to build a self driving train system, and when people get hurt and the company is taken to court, the company is allowed to apologize + blame software + do business as usual w/o fine/penalties.
I’m thinking even at the time enough stuff was (successfully, safely) automated that they would’ve agreed.
You want everyone at your company to know that if they get dragged in front of a judge, pointing fingers at silicon will not prove a winning strategy. Hence, a computer must never make a management decision!
I would ensure it’s impossible to activate it from inside the car. Otherwise, eventually someone might worry about you cheating toll booths.
(…actually sounds like in Texas they’re just banned outright?)
Or being a baddy burglar!
Unusually cute