Ever wanted to see a human hand under a microscope?

722 points · 12 comments · view on lemmy.world

12 Comments

tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip · 49 pts · 2y (2 replies)

Added some of the other labels you were missing

The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 2y (1 reply)

AmComment

rbn@sopuli.xyz · 11 pts · 2y

Amburger 🍔

smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works · 16 pts · 2y (3 replies)

I always thought I'd be able to see more hand, not less.

fossphi@lemm.ee · 16 pts · 2y

You need a macroscope for that, common mistake

Trafficone@slrpnk.net · 6 pts · 2y

This is because the microscope blocks photons. OP should use a gamma camera or x-ray to see through the microscope body.

stephen01king@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 2y

But microscopes does work by making you see less of the whole thing, but instead filling your vision with the little part of the thing you see.

NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
TachyonTele@lemm.ee · 8 pts · 2y

Has science gone too far!?

Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com · 4 pts · 2y

Get back to work rockhound

assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y

I wonder what it looks like through a microscope?

milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee · 3 pts · 2y

Hand is mostly hidden from view.

False advertising.

unreachable@lemmy.world · -5 pts · 2y