Judge who tossed Trump's classified docs case on list of proposed candidates for attorney general
https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-tossed-trumps-classified-docs-case-list-proposed/story?id=114997807
https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-tossed-trumps-classified-docs-case-list-proposed/story?id=114997807
21 Comments
just_another_person@lemmy.world · 70 pts · 1y
No shit. She needs to be investigated when Harris wins.
hddsx@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 1y
Nothing will happen unless there’s a majority in both the house and the senate. She has to be impeached. I don’t believe the executive branch can fire her.
Riccosuave@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y
They can and should criminally charge her if they had any fucking balls at all.
hddsx@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 1y
Really? Can you find me a reference? I thought the executive branch’s check on the judicial branch was appointment
Riccosuave@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
Her preventing, hindering, or delaying the lawful prosecution of someone who stole state secrets definitely fits the federal criminal code for seditious conspiracy.
timewarp@lemmy.world · -8 pts · 1y
Democrats should lock up all the Republicans to show how dangerous Trump suggesting he'd lock up his political opponents is to democracy.
whostosay@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
Define irony
undercrust@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 1y
This account (timewarp@lemmy.world) is constantly putting out bad faith arguments that are anti-Dem / pro-GOP. Sometimes they're obvious, other times it's more insidious.
Just tag the user as a person who is trying to be subversive and dishonest and it'll be easier to spot their bullshit.
floofloof@lemmy.ca · 49 pts · 1y
She has proven herself to be craven and corrupt enough, willing to serve Trump instead of the USA. I imagine she's a leading candidate.
undercrust@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 1y
Hell, it's how JD got tapped for VP, so a proven tactic to advancement
AshMan85@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 1y
She should be on the list of accomplices
Bonesince1997@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 1y
One of his "Hitler Generals"
barsquid@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 1y
It's actually surprising me that she would receive a favor after he no longer needs her. I guess Federalist Society recognizes a shamelessly corrupt collaborator when they see one.
SauceBossSmokin@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1y
You have it backwards. She doesn't get a favor. Everything is about Trump and who he thinks will do him favor after favor. The judge already did him a huge favor and Trump would expect constant favors if the judge is appointed AG.
phar@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 1y
This. He knows he has a useful one now.
Nastybutler@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 1y
Quid pro quo. I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you.
stoly@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
Fortunately she’d be incompetent at it.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 1y
Kakistocracy
rigatti@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
Cool word, unfortunately not as cool of a concept
Snapz@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
Open corruption
MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 1y
::: spoiler ABC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report) Information for ABC News:
::: spoiler Search topics on Ground.News https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-tossed-trumps-classified-docs-case-list-proposed/story?id=114997807 ::: Media Bias Fact Check | bot support