This is bullshit, it defined but didn't even use the continuous functions ๐and ๐.
golang is gonna be fuckin pissed when it finds out
IMSA kid?
Those are backups in case the other functions break down.
๐ isnt a metric dumbass, its an orange
Naranja
So to clarify, definitely European and not African?
I don't know falls to his death
Americans will use anything other than metric
Its probably reasonable to say that 25% of math majors cant solve this, therefore non-math majors aren't people
"sup" without a "\" belongs-to-set symbol \[ and \]
scrรถdinger's TeX
I mean, technically, it is true. At least 25% of people can't solve that.
I can answer the question. No.
Heโs right.
Yes I can, as this is just the metric induces by the L-infinty norm. But why did we introduce ๐ and๐?
Look at this shmuck, using the supremum of a continuous function on a closed interval when it clearly achieves a maximum. I bet theyโll feel real embarrassed about that one when theyโre falling asleep years from now.
Christ, it's like people just don't even give a fuck about the extreme value theorem anymore?
I get you are joking, but I've seen many literature just using sup for maximum. Maybe for consistency or laziness, idk why
I am waiting for someone to actually answer this
Yes. https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definition:Supremum_Metric#Continuous_Real_Functions
Thanks. I've mostly forgotten real analysis by this point but the meme seemed really familiar, lol.
Oh, I expected it to be some unsolved problem.
Thanks for the link. I expected there would be a problem with triangle inequality but didn't want to do the actual proving ๐
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definition:Supremum_Metric#Continuous_Real_Functions
๐๐๐๐
By using ๐ to rate how good this post is(out of 5), i made it a metric for how good this post is
The function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.
Nyar!
27 Comments
Rusty@lemmy.ca · 73 pts · 1y
This is bullshit, it defined but didn't even use the continuous functions ๐and ๐.
BmeBenji@lemm.ee · 30 pts · 1y
golang is gonna be fuckin pissed when it finds out
RavenFellBlade@startrek.website · 1 pts · 1y
IMSA kid?
myslsl@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y
Those are backups in case the other functions break down.
TheCoolerMia@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 50 pts · 1y
๐ isnt a metric dumbass, its an orange
kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml · 25 pts · 1y
swab148@startrek.website · 15 pts · 1y
Naranja
finitebanjo@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
So to clarify, definitely European and not African?
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
I don't know falls to his death
dalekcaan@lemm.ee · 4 pts · 1y
Americans will use anything other than metric
ganoo_slash_linux@lemmy.world · 39 pts · 1y
Its probably reasonable to say that 25% of math majors cant solve this, therefore non-math majors aren't people
Aatube@kbin.melroy.org · 34 pts · 1y
scrรถdinger's TeX
finitebanjo@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 1y
I mean, technically, it is true. At least 25% of people can't solve that.
Rhaedas@fedia.io · 20 pts · 1y
I can answer the question. No.
yeahiknow3@lemmings.world · 6 pts · 1y
Heโs right.
itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 19 pts · 1y
Yes I can, as this is just the metric induces by the L-infinty norm. But why did we introduce ๐ and๐?
RandomWalker@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 1y
Look at this shmuck, using the supremum of a continuous function on a closed interval when it clearly achieves a maximum. I bet theyโll feel real embarrassed about that one when theyโre falling asleep years from now.
myslsl@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
Christ, it's like people just don't even give a fuck about the extreme value theorem anymore?
someacnt_@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
I get you are joking, but I've seen many literature just using sup for maximum. Maybe for consistency or laziness, idk why
LifeLemons@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 1y
I am waiting for someone to actually answer this
wisha@lemmy.ml · 15 pts · 1y
Yes. https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definition:Supremum_Metric#Continuous_Real_Functions
AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 1y
Thanks. I've mostly forgotten real analysis by this point but the meme seemed really familiar, lol.
bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de · 1 pts · 1y
Oh, I expected it to be some unsolved problem.
sukhmel@programming.dev · 1 pts · 1y
Thanks for the link. I expected there would be a problem with triangle inequality but didn't want to do the actual proving ๐
wisha@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 1y
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definition:Supremum_Metric#Continuous_Real_Functions
RandomVideos@programming.dev · 6 pts · 1y
๐๐๐๐
By using ๐ to rate how good this post is(out of 5), i made it a metric for how good this post is
yeahiknow3@lemmings.world · 2 pts · 1y
The function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.
SepulchravesLibrary@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
Nyar!