Rule

203 points · 27 comments · view on lemmy.world

27 Comments

Rusty@lemmy.ca · 73 pts · 1y (3 replies)

This is bullshit, it defined but didn't even use the continuous functions ๐Ÿ‡and ๐Ÿ.

BmeBenji@lemm.ee · 30 pts · 1y (1 reply)

golang is gonna be fuckin pissed when it finds out

RavenFellBlade@startrek.website · 1 pts · 1y

IMSA kid?

myslsl@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y

Those are backups in case the other functions break down.

TheCoolerMia@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 50 pts · 1y (5 replies)

๐ŸŠ isnt a metric dumbass, its an orange

kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml · 25 pts · 1y (3 replies)
[ removed ]
swab148@startrek.website · 15 pts · 1y

Naranja

finitebanjo@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y (1 reply)

So to clarify, definitely European and not African?

Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y

I don't know falls to his death

dalekcaan@lemm.ee · 4 pts · 1y

Americans will use anything other than metric

ganoo_slash_linux@lemmy.world · 39 pts · 1y

Its probably reasonable to say that 25% of math majors cant solve this, therefore non-math majors aren't people

Aatube@kbin.melroy.org · 34 pts · 1y

"sup" without a "\" belongs-to-set symbol \[ and \]

scrรถdinger's TeX

finitebanjo@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 1y

I mean, technically, it is true. At least 25% of people can't solve that.

Rhaedas@fedia.io · 20 pts · 1y (1 reply)

I can answer the question. No.

yeahiknow3@lemmings.world · 6 pts · 1y

Heโ€™s right.

itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 19 pts · 1y

Yes I can, as this is just the metric induces by the L-infinty norm. But why did we introduce ๐Ÿ‡ and๐Ÿ?

RandomWalker@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Look at this shmuck, using the supremum of a continuous function on a closed interval when it clearly achieves a maximum. I bet theyโ€™ll feel real embarrassed about that one when theyโ€™re falling asleep years from now.

myslsl@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Christ, it's like people just don't even give a fuck about the extreme value theorem anymore?

someacnt_@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y

I get you are joking, but I've seen many literature just using sup for maximum. Maybe for consistency or laziness, idk why

LifeLemons@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 1y (4 replies)

I am waiting for someone to actually answer this

wisha@lemmy.ml · 15 pts · 1y (3 replies)
AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 1y

Thanks. I've mostly forgotten real analysis by this point but the meme seemed really familiar, lol.

bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de · 1 pts · 1y

Oh, I expected it to be some unsolved problem.

sukhmel@programming.dev · 1 pts · 1y

Thanks for the link. I expected there would be a problem with triangle inequality but didn't want to do the actual proving ๐Ÿ˜…

wisha@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 1y
RandomVideos@programming.dev · 6 pts · 1y

๐ŸŠ๐ŸŠ๐ŸŠ๐ŸŠ

By using ๐ŸŠ to rate how good this post is(out of 5), i made it a metric for how good this post is

yeahiknow3@lemmings.world · 2 pts · 1y

The function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.

SepulchravesLibrary@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y

Nyar!