someacnt_

u/someacnt_@lemmy.world
11 posts · 484 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

on Reactor goes brrr · c/lemmyshitpost · 2 pts · 1y

This article makes me think I gotta buy some nuclear stocks, but I am hesitant because lemmy might be late on hype cycle. What do you think

In case of math literature, I'd say it is mainly because the equations would be horribly long. Things like integral computation comes with lots of details, or some kind of long exact sequence. Experts would have trouble understanding it, while normal people almost certainly have no interest in understanding the formulae.

Also, often there is no meaning to the variable. Like, in a real function f(x), x is just "a real variable". There is no additional meaning to it.

As for other fields, I dunno. They might have copied math literature style or something.

on i'm at a loss · c/196 · 1 pts · 1y

It was your comment that made me realize, agtwr a day later. Damn

on *Permanently Deleted* · c/asklemmy · 4 pts · 1y

This also depends on the society you are living in. Good luck with "being yourself" in north korea, or even any east asian countries.

on Het! · c/lemmyshitpost · 1 pts · 1y

Welp, my head cannot comprehend how that is possible. How is it deforming the shape around?

Maybe I am confusing homotopy and isotopy again.

on Rule · c/196 · 3 pts · 1y

I get you are joking, but I've seen many literature just using sup for maximum. Maybe for consistency or laziness, idk why