Russia is preparing for a long war

https://en.thebell.io/russia-is-preparing-for-a-long-war/

Russia’s war in Ukraine is already in its 17th month. In that time, President Vladimir Putin has clearly demonstrated that he is not bothered by losses — whether they be financial, material, or human. His war will go on as long as he needs. And, judging by how the authorities have woven the so-called “special military operation” into Russian life, that will be a long time.

2 points · 52 comments · view on lemmy.world

52 Comments

keyboardpithecus@lemmy.basedcount.com · 0 pts · 3y

This is one of the things I pointed out in the post on the permanent war. Russia since the beginning dumped into the war old and outdated equipment. They sent to the front those who they considered the less valuable soldiers at the same time initially they avoided to send recruits from the draft to minimise the political backlash within Russia.

Since the beginning they handled it as a long term attrition war.

sndmn@lemmy.ca · 0 pts · 3y (23 replies)

Russia is so weak and pathetic. I'd call them a joke but their war crimes aren't funny.

LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml · -2 pts · 3y (22 replies)

Same with US/NATO.

phar@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 3y

Nah, NATO is definitely not weak. Russia showed the world they are weak. So much for Russian military might.

Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 3y (3 replies)

If Russia didn't want more of their neighbors to be NATO allies, maybe they should stop giving their neighbors reason to join.

LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml · -2 pts · 3y (2 replies)

NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO's existence. The reasons for joining NATO are to funnel money to America's military contractors Nothing else.

OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 3y (1 reply)

Don't forget to have a place to put nazis after ww2

LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml · -2 pts · 3y

100@lemm.ee · 0 pts · 3y (16 replies)

Tankie cringe

zephyrvs@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 3y (15 replies)

How to say you're a NAFO shill without saying you're a NATO shill.

100@lemm.ee · 0 pts · 3y (14 replies)

Correct. I'll happily shill for the defensive alliance formed to ward off (the currently on display) Russian aggression. NATO would not exist if Russia weren't so nakedly attempting to rebuild the Soviet Union by force, an alliance that had already been litigated and abandoned by the smaller nations Russia pillaged for resources, this time without even pretending to be for the workers.

Edit: no amount of tankie brigading will convince me that Russia isn't the aggressor in the region. Imagine the brainrot required to think that the military that invaded Ukraine and is still currently there is the good team.

OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 3y

Libya

133arc585@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 3y (3 replies)

If you truly think this is a display of Russian aggression I genuinely doubt that you have any historic view on the geopolitics of the region. The conflict did not appear out of thin air in 2022. The situation is more complex than "Russian aggression"; in fact that's not even a part of the picture. Russia is responding to requests for assistance after Ukraine began bombing its own people in 2014. Many of these people voted to join Russia after this disgusting display by Ukraine. Before 2022 most of the combatants against Ukraine were regular people fighting for their homes and families. These people realize that Ukraine wants to bomb their homes and Russia is offering to fight alongside them. On the weekend before the SMO began, there were 2000 ceasefire violations in the Donbass. Between 2014 and 2022, 1 million Ukrainians immigrated to Russia because of the abuse by the Ukrainian government. And since the operation began in 2022, another 1.3 million immigrated. The people in these territories that Ukraine has zero regard for view the support they are receiving from Russia positively: they invited Russia in to assist them, and they are somewhat reliant on Russia to protect them from Ukraine.

I know life is a lot easier when you don't muddy things with context. I know that it's a lot easier to be righteous in your condemnation of a world power because they're "evil" and an "aggressor" than it is to acknowledge that the situation is more complex. I know that it's a lot easier to go along with what Western media says than to be informed and hold your own opinions. I know it feels nice to rally with everyone against a perceived enemy. I know it feels nice to feel that your country (and military) is finally doing something good for once. But you can't let wanting to feel good stand in the way of reality. The Western media has done a hell of a job propagandizing this war, attempting to remove any historical and geopolitical context, in order to gather and maintain support. Think honestly: how much historical and geopolitical context have you seen, especially from popular media sources? How much more effort is spent on raging about current "evil deeds" than understanding the desires of the people in the actual territories that have asked Russia for help?

Please read, and inform yourself. Life is less black-and-white than "Russia evil".

PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml · -4 pts · 3y (2 replies)

Gee, i wonder what happened in 2014 to make Ukrainians start shelling parts of the donbas?

Could it be a land invasion by a neighboring country?

No, they must be Nazis, the extremely trustworthy people in the Kremlin say so...

Pili@lemmygrad.ml · 0 pts · 3y

I will copy paste this comment from Hexbear that explains how we reached that situation, because I believe it will be useful here for context:

The following three parts are absolutely crucial toward understanding the ongoing war in Ukraine from a materialist and historical standpoint:

One, the Maidan Coup happened in 2013 because the former president Yanukovych wanted to postpone signing the EU association trade agreement, which was an economic warfare against both Ukraine and Russia. First, it required that Ukraine take on IMF loans that required them to cut social spending and education. Second, it would allow European goods to flood Russian market due to the existing tariff-free agreement between Ukraine and Russia, without allowing Russia to do so in reverse. Putin did NOT oppose to Ukraine signing the deal, he offered a tripartite meeting to discuss this tariff issue, but the EU refused. Yanukovych did not want to lose the trade revenue with Russia, so he said he needed more time to talk this out with Russia - but it was already too late, merely postponing was enough to trigger the ultranationalists/fascists to launch a coup.

Second, the Donbass separatists rebelled because immediately after the coup, one of the first things the coup regime did was to initiate a ban on Russian language to lash out against ethnic Russians. Russia was forced into the conflict, because there would have been a massacre if the civil war was to allow the military to crush the resistance in Donbass.

Third, the Minsk agreements showed that Russia was absolutely willing to return Donbass (but not Crimea for obvious reasons) to Ukraine, although Ukraine has to give the Donbass local governments more autonomy to protect their local cultures (so that someone from Kyiv can’t just simply impose a national ban on language or culture without considering the local populations). They waited 8 years for Ukraine to start implementing the protocol, but instead what they saw was NATO openly arming Ukraine for 8 years - this showed that Ukraine wanted to take back Donbass and Crimea by military force, and the only reason for that is quite simply that they wanted to ethnically cleanse the Russian culture without having to adhere to the Minsk agreements. Both Merkel and Hollande, guarantors of Minsk II, have admitted publicly in 2022 that Minsk was simply to buy time for Ukraine to militarize, proving Russia’s intuition correct.

The war in Ukraine was inevitable. Russia still did the last ditch effort in 2021 to call for a security meeting with NATO, but to no avail. Under the new Biden presidency, Zelensky had been emboldened to talk about Ukraine joining NATO and rearming with nuclear weapons, prompting the invasion from Russia in February 2022. The rest is history.

Blursty@lemmygrad.ml · -1 pts · 3y (8 replies)

You're in a thread that's showed you that NATO was a place to give jobs to high ranking Nazis. It's the world's most aggressive military alliance that Russia is defending itself from.

100@lemm.ee · 0 pts · 3y (7 replies)

Lmfao "defending itself." Where's the Russian military right now pal? I, too, defend my home by attacking my neighbors.

Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 3y

Are your neighbours putting a nuclear missile in their yard and pointing it at your house, and you're doing nothing?

OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 3y (11 replies)

The Russian economy is set to completely reverse last year’s slump – something Putin has recently highlighted. Manufacturing and construction lead the way, alongside retail. In a broad sense, all three sectors are beneficiaries of the war. The defense sector, working in three shifts, is boosting production: in June, for example, the biggest increases were in finished metal products (+45.8% year-on-year); computers, electronics and optics (+71.6% year-on-year), radar equipment (+75.4% year-on-year) and electrical equipment (+32.1% year-on-year). Production capacities are running at their maximum.

Fredselfish@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 3y (10 replies)

So whats the plan? How can this end?

OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 3y (4 replies)

Sort of like the war in Afghanistan. It'll go on for a very long time

jonne@infosec.pub · 0 pts · 3y (3 replies)

Russia's committing way more resources into this conflict than they ever did for previous similar operations though. Ukraine is claiming they killed/wounded over 200000 Russian soldiers. That's not anywhere near comparable to previous post WWII conflicts.

wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 3y (2 replies)

Human resources yeah, but financial? I'm not sure. The Iraq war cost 3 trillion dollars.

And mind you, you're talking about the victors (mostly) the Korean war cost the lives of 2 million people. As did the Vietnam war.

WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social · 0 pts · 3y (1 reply)

Don't you mean generated trillions of dollars (for private war profiteers)?

EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee · 0 pts · 3y

Rule of Acquisition number 34: War is good for business.

SuspiciousUser@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 3y (4 replies)

He can wait to see if Trump becomes president, because we all know how it will end with his BFF in charge.

FaceDeer@kbin.social · 0 pts · 3y (2 replies)

America is far from the only country providing support to Ukraine.

Noughmad@programming.dev · 0 pts · 3y (1 reply)

True, but if America decides to provide support to Russia, the rest of NATO will stand down.

FaceDeer@kbin.social · 1 pts · 3y

There's a vast difference between America ceasing to support Ukraine and America supporting Russia. Simply never going to happen, that's a loonie scenario.

NATO is not officially supporting Ukraine. It just so happens that all the various NATO member countries are all individually deciding that it's in their interests to support Ukraine. If America drops out that's not going to change whether it's in the interests of those countries to continue supporting Ukraine. Indeed, it becomes all the more important for many of them to make sure Russia's strength is broken if they don't feel they can rely on America to support them.

LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml · -2 pts · 3y

You must know by now that Russiagate was a hoax?

blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social · 0 pts · 3y (12 replies)

I see the Russia shills and trolls have finally started to move on from reddit now lol. LarkinDePark, Yogthos. RIP.

aehnh@lemmy.ml · -3 pts · 3y

OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml · -4 pts · 3y (10 replies)

Bud those "Russian shills" have been here much longer than you

pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 3y (9 replies)

How does that change what they are?

OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml · -4 pts · 3y (8 replies)

We haven't come to a mutually agreed definition and it doesn't seem to be worth my time to do so with you.

I am simply pointing out that you're trying to claim that you were here first, when this website was created by a leftist and populated by leftists, and you only came over here when reddit being a shithole started to effect you personally.

pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 3y (7 replies)

In other words, you don't have an answer, you're defending shitty pro-Russia astroturfing and propaganda smearing.

Why do the admins tolerate this?

aehnh@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 3y (3 replies)

The admins are probably also what you would consider "Russian shills". They explicitly announced they wouldn't ban people with different ideologies which is why you're allowed to spout your western propaganda here

pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee · -1 pts · 3y (2 replies)

🤔 And yet they're federated with ours. Welp, we'll fix that in a hot minute

OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml · -1 pts · 3y

Oh no, please don't isolate yourself further and prevent us and everyone else in the fediverse looking at this instance from being exposed to your opinions, that would really own us.

You'll note how this communist designed open source fediverse structure is less coercive than capitalist reddit while still applying incentives to discourage reactionary behavior. If you entirely isolate yourselves, you've just recreated the structure of reddit.

aehnh@lemmy.ml · -3 pts · 3y

🦀

OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml · -4 pts · 3y (2 replies)

Bud you need to look up the definition of astroturfing.

pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee · 1 pts · 3y (1 reply)

You need to grow up

OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml · -3 pts · 3y

I'm not the one who believes the paid Russian posters are in the room with us right now, on this niche leftist community that you've graced with your redditor presence.

OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 3y

But I thought that the Slavic brainpan couldn't produce ball bearings?! /s

Omidov@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 3y

It's great to have a new perspective on this conflict and I personally welcome your work and effort here. Thank you!