Modlog: https://feddit.org/modlog/242334
Tl,dr: got a 3 day banned for pointing new joiners to !buyeuropean@feddit.uk , a more active version of !buyfromeu@feddit.org
Context
!buyeuropean@feddit.uk was established to promote European products and services. It got popular recently due to the US decision of potentially dropping support to Ukraine. It had a diverse team of moderators, and was getting some activity.
A feddit.org user (potentially unaware of the existence of the first community) decided to create !buyfromeu@feddit.org
They deleted their Lemmy account after, but promoted a new moderator before leaving.
This moderator created a post to vote about keeping the feddit.org community, or consolidating with the feddit.uk one: https://feddit.org/post/8679890
That vote itself is kind of debatable, as the only option to vote for the consolidation was to downvote, which is not enabled on instances like Blahaj or Reddthat. Also people tend to upvote more than downvote, so the votes expressed may not reflect the actual opinion of the community, but anyway.
Usually, I don't really care that much about consolidation, there has been a lot of parallel communities for a while, like
- !android@lemmy.world and !android@lemdro.id
- !movies@lemm.ee and !movies@lemmy.world
- !privacy@lemmy.ml, !privacyguides@lemmy.one, !privacy@lemmy.world, !privacy@programming.dev, !privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
It's not that big of a deal usually, but this case is a big different due to the BuyFromEU movement.
BuyfromEU movement and Lemmy new joiners
https://old.reddit.com/r/BuyFromEU/ is getting quite large recently, even getting some press coverage. There are a few posts promoting Lemmy over there, with more or less success.
What happens then is that people join Lemmy, just look for "buyfromeu" and find the feddit.org community, while the feddit.uk is actually much more active. Some stats:
feddit.org:
- 1.04K users / day
- 2.34K users / week
- 3.02K users / month
- 3.02K users / 6 months
- 1.9K subscribers
- 125 Posts
- 1.34K Comments
feddit.uk:
- 3.79K users / day
- 8.11K users / week
- 8.86K users / month
- 8.92K users / 6 months
- 2.7K subscribers
- 354 Posts
- 5.58K Comments
The main issue with this is that as the usually is kind of active, they think that the feddit.org community is the main community on the topic, while the feddit.uk is much more active. So I started to check for new joiners account, and if they hadn't posted or commented on the feddit.uk community, I would point them to it, with comments like
Welcome here!
A few pointers for you:
The sidebar also lists a few complementary communities to this one, such as !buyeuropean@feddit.uk or !europe@feddit.org
Apparently this seems enough to give a temporary ban. The mod team is also quite expressive about the "consolidation cannot be discussed stance" https://feddit.org/post/8905532
Just to add some more context, those are the type of comments I give to every new joiners. Some recent examples
- https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/17196236
- https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/17196078
- https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/17196020
Now, a last section about why I'm personally in favor of consolidating.
Federation and decentralization is about spreading power and responsibilities, not splitting a small user base between different places
Some people argue that consolidating communities goes against the spirit of federation and decentralization. However, for people posting content, there is a consensus that our small user base can only sustain so many communities. Splintering the discussion between places is detrimental to the whole platform. Example of recent consolidations:
In the buyfromEU / buyEuropean case, we see people asking recommendations on the same topics on the two communities, while they might have seen a post from the other one is there was only one: https://feddit.org/post/8925080/5204057
Note that there are cases when new communities need to emerge due to power tripping mods. But here, the feddit.uk mods and admins have been good, no such issue to be reported.
Also, quite a few communities are "the main ones", without any parallel community
- !europe@feddit.org
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !gardening@lemmy.world
Choice overload and decision fatigue are a thing
Too many options hurts users’ decision-making ability. How they feel about the experience as a whole can be significantly impacted as a result.
https://lawsofux.com/choice-overload/
Isn't one for European Union and the other for the whole Europe?
The text what to expect says, that we are focusing on the EU, but if other befriended countries slip through we are not enforcing rules. We called it a soft limit, so pepole tend to limit themselves, rather than mods jumping each post.
https://feddit.org/comment/5211878
Due to the inherited name, buyFromEU we would like to soft limit the discussion to the European Union countries. We are tempted to read this as EU + friendly countries as long as this is within reason.
https://feddit.org/post/8545702
Wouldn't consolidating lose people?
An example of successful consolidation/migration: https://lemmy.world/c/football
Shouldn't people see the other community from the sidebar?
Sidebars aren't usually visible on a lot of apps, on Voyager for instance people have to actively look for it:

https://vger.app/search/lemm.ee/c/buyfromeu@feddit.org
Why is this case different from other parallel communities?
Due to the growth of the /r/BuyFromEU sub (now at 148000 subscribers), some posts promoting Lemmy are appearing every few days: https://old.reddit.com/r/BuyFromEU/comments/1j7vkrg/the_european_hosted_reddit_alternative_lemmee_is/
As you can see, the main comment is about community split across instances. The commenter was incorrect about the working of federation, but us being unable to provide one community for the discussions to happen isn't putting Lemmy in a good light as a viable Reddit alternative.
81 Comments
cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de · 57 pts · 1y
Finally, feddit drama! Now I feel right at home.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 17 pts · 1y
Enjoy!
Emperor@feddit.uk · 8 pts · 1y
Can I interest you in !fedidrama@lemmy.ca?
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 1y
Wasn't it !fediverselore@lemmy.ca ?
Emperor@feddit.uk · 6 pts · 1y
On yeah, that first one needs new Mods.
cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 1y
It would appear that sub's not ready yet.
Emperor@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 1y
You are only guessing based on the title across the top of the page.
a887dcd7a@feddit.org · 1 pts · 1y
🍿
drunkosaurus@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 47 pts · 1y
Some people can't gey away from the centralised mindset. Why not both instances? That's the essence of the Fediverse!? It's not a zero sum game, unless I'm missing something...
spankmonkey@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 1y
You aren't missing anything, especially if they have different contexts.
The only issue I see is that when the same articles are posted to different communities the discussion is split. But that also happens for similar, but not identical posts even within the same community when they are posted hours apart.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 1y
What is the different context between the two communities in this case?
Kichae@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 1y
Well, they're on different websites, for one. That context, despite what many here want to believe, is meaningful.
spankmonkey@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
I was speaking in general, not this exact scenario.
But if they merged, all posts on the topic are at the mercy of the instance admins and mods. So if a community for buy EU was on an instance that limited all posts to English, users wouldn't be able to post in German like they can on feddit.org. not saying the UK would do that, but it would apply to an all English instance. Or the posts could be in the context of the instance location. Like a similar community on lemmy.ca would probably be focused on buying from the EU with the context of shipping to Canada.
No, I won't be spending my time finding the ratio of these two exact communities because I am disagreeing with the need to consolidate in general.
Emperor@feddit.uk · 7 pts · 1y
We won't.
bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 1y
That will work itself out over time.
Kichae@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 1y
A lot of people get ants in their pants over the idea of people talking about the same or similar things in different places, for some reason. Decentralization's just a buzz word, I guess.
Sunshine@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 1y
That’s why communities should be evenly split amongst instances. There’s no need to fragment the conversation unless the 2 or more communities have differing cultures.
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 37 pts · 1y
PTB. Leaving a comment like this doesn't hurt anyone, even if it's on every post. The mod just doesn't want to lose power.
Shadow@lemmy.ca · 33 pts · 1y
Yeah I'd say PTB. They're more interested in maintaining control, than what's good for the users and community.
a887dcd7a@feddit.org · 22 pts · 1y
Hi, the critizied, accused and power-tripping mod here.
Not adding something to the debatable merging discussion, which sure can be a talked about and is even talked bout at other places, and now here again.
The perspective missing is, that a team of mods, even of other communities talked about the course of action. Reason is, that I'm quite new to moderation, and I did not want to overreact. People native to the instance decided to stick with the community, and the debatable vote added weight to that sentiment. One guy brought the topic up over and over again and tried to position an alternative community instead of adding content to both communities.
Other mods recommended to ban him for a week or for good. I decided to engage in communication and asked to postpone discussing that issue in that particular community. Also I asked to stop gurilla advertising another commiunithy while that community was in a built up phase.
After futile mitigation attempts a 3 days ban, coordinated with about 3+2, mods was applied.
This is my whole power trip, and I'm so addicted to it, that I onboarded more mods and employed a voting system, so that banning only happens, when no other way of settling an issue can be achieve.
Edit: The full ban reason was. "Recurring egress linking without providing content for siphoning users. Promotion of community dissolvement." The textfield was a little small.
nomoretwats@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 1y
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 0 pts · 1y
I mentioned "the mod team" in the post, I never assumed it was only your personal decision.
Power tripping can happen with a group of mods, it's actually quite often the case.
a887dcd7a@feddit.org · 18 pts · 1y
See. What I don’t get. If you’re against a community, just don’t participate. You wouldn’t walk in somebodies living room and start a conversation on how much you like the other dudes place.
Just go to that other dudes place and enjoy the better company.
That way all people can do things they enjoy.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
If you read the other comments here you could get other people's perspectives.
Using your analogy, we should never talk about Lemmy on Reddit, just wait for people to magically hear about us.
a887dcd7a@feddit.org · 1 pts · 1y
If your logic applies, we should never have left reddit .
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 1y
No. My stance is not "we should all go to the bigger place all over the Internet", it is that "we only have so many Lemmy users, let's avoid discussion fragmentation for the same topic unless necessary (e.g. power tripping admins)"
On top of that, I'm generally supportive of more specific communities: https://lemmy.world/post/26609608
But this one has a different focus, so that makes sense.
!buyeuropean@feddit.uk and !buyfromeu@feddit.org are identical
a887dcd7a@feddit.org · 5 pts · 1y
You keep on mixing up two things. One the reason you got banned and calling me/us power tripping.
Second point the discussion about a merger. I take it that merging is so dear to your heart, that you fight for it. That is fine, and well. What you don't get is, that other perspectives have validy, too. You keep on ignoring that and bringin the discussion to each and every community. Sometimes even in an hostile and toxic manner (lemme.ee) .
In other words: you seem to be quite fixated an numbers and have a rough, even hostile commnication style, even victimizing yourself, without telling the whole story and inflaming drama. Why would I want to merge in such a community?
Also: how come, you can not accept the deciscion of others? Isn't that trippy itself?
Zagorath@aussie.zone · 6 pts · 1y
Well, yeah. You banned them for the crime of helping new users find alternatives in case they were unaware they existed. Being unaware of alternatives is one of the key UX problems with the fediverse, so informing people about them is critical. Banning people for doing that, especially in the incredibly respectful and apparently targeted way OP was doing it, is pretty awful. The team agreeing on it doesn't change this, it just means the whole mod team is PTB.
No, you victimised them. You banned them for a shitty reason. That makes them the victim. You, ironically, are trying to play victim in this very thread, because they're calling you out on your poor behaviour. You've barely even tried to justify yourself, except by saying that the whole mod team agreed to it…which isn't a justification.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 1y
I was clarifying my stance, which you brought up.
Not sure what you mean, this link doesn't point to anywhere.
Feel free to point to such examples for everyone to judge.
You were offered a mod position to !buyeuropean@feddit.uk . Your whole current team could probably join, the current mods wouldn't probably mind. I'm just a user.
That argument can be used for any power tripping decision. "The user should accept the power tripping mod decision, or they are themselves power tripping"
D_a_X@feddit.org · 0 pts · 1y
Yes and, is it bad if there are two communities with the same content?
You remind me of my grandchild when it was three years old and wanted to have its way with lots of screaming and shouting. I's now six and you can already have sensible discussions with the child.
How old do you have to be to accept that other people see things differently to you?
By the way: Somehow there's a rumor going around on Lemmy that you're also trying this with other instances and other communities.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 1y
Reasoning is detailed in the post.
It's not a rumor, it's a fact. There's even a dedicated community to it, !fedigrow@lemm.ee
I pointed to a few examples in the OP, nothing secret here:
GrammarPolice@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
Dumb ass interpretation
Emperor@feddit.uk · 19 pts · 1y
Phew.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 14 pts · 1y
😄
Sunshine@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 1y
I’m a good girl. I swear!
Emperor@feddit.uk · 7 pts · 1y
You have the Blaze Mark of Approval - it doesn't get better than that.
fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 17 pts · 1y
a887dcd7a@feddit.org · 2 pts · 1y
TBH: doesn’t look too respectful without knowing the other side of the story 🙂
fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 1y
a887dcd7a@feddit.org · 2 pts · 1y
Evolving under that comment: https://feddit.org/post/9009206/5250708
lvxferre@mander.xyz · 16 pts · 1y
sunzu2@thebrainbin.org · 1 pts · 1y
Emperor@feddit.uk · 5 pts · 1y
I think they meant consolidation on feddit.uk.
lvxferre@mander.xyz · 4 pts · 1y
AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space · 12 pts · 1y
Oof, that is really unfortunate behaviour there. I know moderating can be tough and sometimes emotionally charged, but this really seems like overstepping their boundaries to the detriment of the community. Especially considering I know how much work you have been and are doing for fediverse growth and content.
Also, might be interesting to crosspost this to !fediverselore@lemmy.ca - although the community there can sometimes flipflop from actually interesting and insightful to slightly toxic.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 1y
Thank you for your comment!
Fediverselore rules prevents posting about events you are involved in
Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 1y
PTB, banning people for sharing alternatives is shitty and comes off as you trying to gatekeep your community and prevent people from learning about alternatives.
Also since @a887dcd7a@feddit.org decided to comment, it doesn't matter if the Rest of the team agreed with you or not, that just makes all of you PTB as well. The fact this was even considered as a good idea and implemented to suppress knowledge of alternatives makes it PTB.
If anyone is reading this, stay away from that mod's shithole and go to !buyeuropean@feddit.uk instead. It's more active and isn't run by PTBs.
a887dcd7a@feddit.org · 0 pts · 1y
From my perspective the wrong impression. The community was young and in the making, I asked politely to tone it down, so I can find mods, setup rules and think about what content should be expected. Jumping all users and each post in a that manner was not helping that community and did nothing to connect communities at that point. We openly communicate other places to subscribe, too. You cannot create content in a community if every second post is about leaving that community, instead of the topic that should be discussed.
Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -4 pts · 1y
Just wanted to say ty for coming on here to respond! Many don't do that, seem like a decent enough mod IMO & I can't say I disagree with your actions.
MissGutsy@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 pts · 1y
Honest question: why can't both communities just exist separately? Isn't this the magic of the Fediverse?
Your biggest point is that the communities are identical in content and I disagree. Just looking at the top posts of the week, the feddit.uk version has a bunch of memes, while feddid.org seems more news focused. The Fediverse allows us to moderate these communities differently and to have different styles of communities, perfectly shown with this example. They are not identical.
We shouldn't build up just one community all the time. That just runs into the same problem why people disliked reddit: centralized moderation. It's not a problem now, but if it ever will be, why can't there be alternatives. Let's not try to become the next reddit, but become something better.
Also some people left reddit because it all became to big, they want small groups that actually feel like a community. If people prefer a smaller lemmy community, let them have it. They voted against merging, so let them have it. !buyeuropean@feddit.uk is already linked in their sidebar. Everybody that wants to can switch the community or subscribe to both (which is a possibility!!).
I think you're in the wrong here, at least on trying to grow the uk community over the org one.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
People posting to both communities without distinction seems to indicate they are identical
You would not see such things happening on !politics@hexbear.net and !politics@lemmy.world
We are not the same Reddit because admins don't have absolute power: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/18234778
It's everyone keeping everyone in check, with meta communities like the ones we're in keeping balance.
BrutallyHonestPOS@lemm.ee · 3 pts · 1y
having some similarities does not make them identical. having all similarities makes them identical. having one community generate traffic and distractions with memes does make a big difference.
both communities should coexist. siphoning users from one to another community is a dickmove. however, i expect most users to be smart enough to just join both. i think a 3 day ban is not the end of the world, especially since you make it sound like your only input in their community was advertising for another community. i guess nothing of value was lost on that front and it had a nice side effect sparking this discussion.
i think posting your issue in this community here is also a dickmove.
maybe you should contact the mods privately and talk with THEM on that matter. i think your comment was phrased fairly and did not really say "hey, leave this community and join us!" - so i think it is worth trying to find a solution.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 1y
That's a shame. I'm guessing the new sudden mod responsibilities went to somebody who isn't ready for it.
IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 1y
jet@hackertalks.com · 6 pts · 1y
Not PTB, and not quite YDI.
your history of trying to consolidate communities to external instances (such as our wonderful privacy discussion) may irk moderators. You are the number 1 community dissolver on lemmy. Especially when you cross post someone's post from community A to community B and siphon the user activity by being the more recent post.
A moderator may not agree with your consolidation choices (i.e. they like the TOS on a different instance) and reasonably see your actions as a net negative.
I think its more fair to do community competition through better and more frequent content. Reposting content to your favored community (i.e. top post content jacking), and going into other communities to direct users to your favored community isn't very nice.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
Hello,
Sorry, I don't remember, is it this one? https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/35817877
These days it's usually @threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works : https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/39673185?scrollToComments=true
Indeed, that's what's happening with !linux@programming.dev vs !linux@lemmy.ml. What differences are they here between feddit.org and feddit.uk
Counterpoint: to bring regular posters, you need activity. With only so many people posting on Lemmy, activity can only happen in one place at the same time.
Libb@jlai.lu · 6 pts · 1y
It's nice that both parties are discussing here.
I read all of the discussion, I think it may be useful to point out that here are two different issues at hand here:
Those two issues should be dealt with separately, if anyone is hoping to reach any agreement.
Could the two communities thrive? Maybe, maybe not. They could both die, too.
Could they merge? I think so (because I don't see large enough differences between them).
Should they merge? I think so but not if one of them doesn't want to merge, it's simple. It's called freedom and respect.
Should they discuss a merge even if they don't appreciate each other, instead of banning and/or spamming? I think so too. At least in the interest of the two communities. Failing to do so would only reflects we're not better than some of those elected clowns we call our representatives... And seeing how crass stupid some of them are, I'd rather try my hardest to never look like them :p
A few more general considerations, keep in mind they're coming from an old fart that probably doesn't understand much:
If I really think they're wrong, I may ask other persons around me but if none agrees with me, well I'm back to square one and I will either stop going there or stop doing whatever I was doing.
I try to not be mean but I will also say what I have to say and I'm fine with some people not liking it (or not liking me) as I'm fine with me me not liking what they say.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
Thank you for pointing this out. It's a major effect known in research, I linked it in the OP.
I don't have the time to address the rest of your comment, but I think I've already presented most of my perspective in the OP and in other comments.
Breezy@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
After reading from thier mod, you just seem to be acting out. Delete this post because it really makes you look bad to the informed.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 1y
Not sure what do to with someone's modlog shows repeated insults in different communities: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/modlog?userId=1746189
AnonomousWolf@lemm.ee · 6 pts · 1y
sunzu2@thebrainbin.org · 2 pts · 1y
Breezy@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 1y
Not at all. Its nice you would speak so highly of me though. Thank you.
Breezy@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 1y
If im toxic then you're just a little snowflake. You cant tell me looking at that link that im too bad. Yeah ill say some shit, but im not like offense or anything bad. People can cry all they want or be a bitch and try to showcase my bad behavior but im actually one of the best people to find online. So please tell me what I said that was so bad. Because honestly you just seem like a shill.
Breezy@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 1y
Oh wow i didnt know you could do that. But yup im rude as fuck, thats why im saying you're looking bad.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 1y
It's one click in newer versions of Lemmy

The feature gets used quite often, it helps to identify who you are dealing with
Breezy@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 1y
Well this post will help others not to give a shit about what you say then. No offense really.
What app do you use?
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
Default Lemmy web page
Breezy@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 1y
I dont have a pc so im stuck on mobile. Its a shame that feature seems realy cool
remon@ani.social · 7 pts · 1y
You can use the web page on mobile.
Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 1y
YDI, aggressively trying to stifle a community like that leaves a very very poor impression IMO, people have their reasons for choosing certain instances and that should be respected.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 1y
I definitely agree. What I'm missing here is that feddit.uk and feddit.org are both handled by teams of multiple teams based in European countries, with similar moderation policies. This is not !politics@hexbear.net vs !politics@lemmy.world
Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -1 pts · 1y
And? This is the entire point of federated networks, if for example the .org instance imploded for whatever reason then the community could easily regroup and hit the ground running on the .UK instance, pushing for everything to be centralised in large communities undermines the benefits of federation.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
!moviesandtv@lemmy.film quickly disappeared afternoon the instance went down. People still reorganized on !movies@lemm.ee and !showsandmovies@lemm.ee
Also, historically the same thing happened with feddit.de went the admins went missing. People still managed to reorganize on feddit.org
I just had a quick look at https://feddit.org/communities
Where are the backup communities for !europe@feddit.org , !dach@feddit.org and !deutschland@feddit.org ?
Finally, I'm not advocating for a complete deletion of the existing community, just a lock, that can be easily undone if needed, in scenarios described above.
Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 1y
Nah, having a reasonably active community on another instance is also a bulwark against mods going rogue.
Trying to ask where the back up communities are for the ones you posted is not exactly relevant, if they did have secondary backup communities I'd be in favour of them staying indepdnent and active but we're talking about ones which do currently have communities across different instances.
And yes people will reorganise but that takes a degree of time even if only a few days, I see no reason to go around pressuring for "duplicates" to be folded into a single large community when they don't exactly impact the function of the subject matter and allow for a very quick migration should something go wrong.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
To be honest in this case people might prefer to move to !BuyFromEU@lemm.ee rather than !buyfromeu@feddit.org should !buyeuropean@feddit.uk go bust
Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y
Then people can choose to do so.
nomoretwats@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 1y
pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 1y
the android community moved instances and then randomly split
anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 0 pts · 1y
YDI.
Not because you're wrong about consolidating communities, and not even because you were trying to get people to move to the other comm; but because you're doing it in the least communal and democratic way possible, and for your disregard for the mod team and community's collective intent. I think the mod team handled this pretty well.
These kinds of crusades are antithetical to the spirit of the fediverse, and I really wish this community didn't attract so many Don Quixote-types fighting windmills.
Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -1 pts · 1y
Reddit mods use the exact same reasoning when removing posts mentioning Lemmy
anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 0 pts · 1y
And we don't usually get to see the receipts, but this time we do.
It's one thing to make mention of or recommend another community, it's another to spend your time flooding their threads with it repeatedly, even when asked to stop. What starts as impassioned advocacy can quickly turn into harassment and spam, and I think you crossed that line.
It should be evident just in the way you wrote an entire wiki article in this post - they were right to temporarily remove you from this conversation. If you only go there to dissolve their community, they have every right to kick you out of it.
Etterra@discuss.online · -4 pts · 1y
Well I mean it's Reddit, that's half their MO now. The other half is being thought police.
sunzu2@thebrainbin.org · -6 pts · 1y
realchadmctruth@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -6 pts · 1y
this is eerily similar to my experience