Linux does not sugarcoat it

594 points · 24 comments · view on lemmy.world

24 Comments

AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space · 91 pts · 1y (12 replies)

Another classic:

palordrolap@fedia.io · 64 pts · 1y (4 replies)
$ man woman 
No manual entry for woman

Linux knows the importance of consent / If you're not one already, Linux can't help you understand /

rtxn@lemmy.world · 49 pts · 1y (3 replies)
$ sudo touch woman
You are not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
remotelove@lemmy.ca · 30 pts · 1y (1 reply)

You want me to do what now?

(Sudo, the cat.)

rtxn@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 1y

Ah, I see you've got the new hardware implementation of netcat.

excral@feddit.org · 1 pts · 1y
user224@lemmy.sdf.org · 33 pts · 1y (2 replies)

rain_worl@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y (1 reply)

termux?

user224@lemmy.sdf.org · 3 pts · 1y

Yes.

davidgro@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Baby don't hurt me

voodooattack@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Don’t hurt me

perishthethought@lemm.ee · 7 pts · 1y

No more

klu9@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 1y

Kraiden@kbin.earth · 81 pts · 1y (2 replies)
[ removed ]
lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 1y (1 reply)

🤣🤣🤣

FauxLiving@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y

MommyLinux

muusemuuse@lemm.ee · 29 pts · 1y

When testing for permissions, I still giggle over trying to execute “touch this” then being told “can’t touch this”

Kolanaki@pawb.social · 21 pts · 1y

That's only because you didn't ask it as an admin.

SUDO whoami should return "God."

yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 1y

Are you Odysseus or smth?

Artyom@lemm.ee · 7 pts · 1y

24601!

DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y

🥲

clonedhuman@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y

oh no Linux don't say it again

sircac@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y

My name Is Nobody (Il mio nome è Nessuno)

Thcdenton@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y

TheCoralReefsAreDying69@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y

Linus wouldn't sugarcoat it either.