Ukraine has drones that can do the last mile themselves (= selecting their target and explode in a place that makes the most damage), to prevent Russia from it working by jamming the signal
I think there was a story I read, years ago, about a computer being used to identify and destroy AA platforms in a simulated war exercise. Back then (back in my day) it wasn't called AI, it was a machine learning program. But anyway, the computer was scored based on how many targets it successfully destroyed. However, it could only engage targets when a clear to fire authorization was given by a human.
Eventually then endeavor was abandoned because the computer figured out it was humans preventing it from getting a higher score. So, mathematically it made sense for the machine to kill its handlers so as to grant itself fire-at-will capabilities.
It may have been a sci-fi piece and not a real event. It becomes more and more difficult to tell now a days.
30 Comments
jol@discuss.tchncs.de · 44 pts · 1y
What do you mean "when"? AI is used in war all the time.
match@pawb.social · 10 pts · 1y
well, since the mid 2010s at least
Dasus@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 1y
WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social · 29 pts · 1y
If war only involves robots and and AI, at least no humans will be killed …right?
Edit; I thought that it was obvious I was being sarcastic.
kubica@fedia.io · 14 pts · 1y
Well, maybe only some at the beginning, but then there will be no more to kill.
Tangent5280@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y
The machine war will rage eternal
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 9 pts · 1y
Not if we block out the sun. And then wait for the chosen one to make peace with the robots...
huppakee@lemm.ee · 5 pts · 1y
Until the ai learns tracking innocent people hostage is a good way to force your opponent into submission. Wars haven't been known to be clean
Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
Who said anything about only?
WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social · 5 pts · 1y
You mean our smarter betters aren’t doing this so humans don’t have to die in their shitty wars?
GraniteM@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Taste_of_Armageddon
match@pawb.social · 2 pts · 1y
every conflict will primarily of AI-driven systems killing civilians, we have yet to have ai versus ai
T156@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y
E-War probably comes close, though.
Anomalocaris@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 1y
Google "the gospel Gaza "
SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 1y
The IDF uses AI already to choose bombing targets to shrug responsibility.
manucode@infosec.pub · 13 pts · 1y
I hope the poster in the screenshot was born in Austria in 1988.
Anomalocaris@lemm.ee · 11 pts · 1y
Google "the gospel Israel"
it's not when, or if, it's already a thing
match@pawb.social · 3 pts · 1y
fully evil, but "Habsora" is amazing taste in naming an evil ai
too_high_for_this@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
What the fuck
RangerJosey@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 1y
Korea has terminators that know karate. Autonomous killer drones have been in the testing phase for a few years now.
Someone even made Faro Plague machines that consume biomass for fuel.
wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 1y
Israel is using AI for planning, for "analyzing" all the photos and data they collect, and for assistance selecting targets for their drone strikes.
lunarul@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 1y
Which is what that Microsoft employee protested against and got fired for.
huppakee@lemm.ee · 4 pts · 1y
Ukraine has drones that can do the last mile themselves (= selecting their target and explode in a place that makes the most damage), to prevent Russia from it working by jamming the signal
ashenone@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 1y
AI gonna fight the War in Heaven. I read it in a future history book
P00ptart@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
AI will be fighting other AI for thousands of years after we're gone.
Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org · 7 pts · 1y
Palantir pre-emptive drone strike
JamesTBagg@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y
I think there was a story I read, years ago, about a computer being used to identify and destroy AA platforms in a simulated war exercise. Back then (back in my day) it wasn't called AI, it was a machine learning program. But anyway, the computer was scored based on how many targets it successfully destroyed. However, it could only engage targets when a clear to fire authorization was given by a human.
Eventually then endeavor was abandoned because the computer figured out it was humans preventing it from getting a higher score. So, mathematically it made sense for the machine to kill its handlers so as to grant itself fire-at-will capabilities.
It may have been a sci-fi piece and not a real event. It becomes more and more difficult to tell now a days.
h3mlocke@lemm.ee · 3 pts · 1y
Lmao thought it said warframe, and was like these comments don't make sense.... 🤦♀️
RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
I can't wait for AI to destroy humanity
match@pawb.social · 10 pts · 1y
humanity will be destroying humanity, ai is just a tool that will be used in the process