WYR - Starve to death or eat a person? (They're already dead, you don't have to kill them)

It's been seen in the past that both choices have been made.

10 points · 8 comments · view on lemmy.world

8 Comments

Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y

I'd be hornier if I killed you myself.

jet@hackertalks.com · 2 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Depends if we have access to a freezer. Freeze the dead, and fast until there is no other choice then cook.

HubertManne@piefed.social · 3 pts · 265d (1 reply)

yeah this a big factor. meat is pretty dangrous unless preserved and generally the closer the species to your own the more dangerous (more shared pathogens). Given cannibalism is not something one is likely to jump at the opportuniry for (unless your @lacanoodle@literature.cafe ), then you would need a situation liek those people in the andies where the corpses were frozen (the movie alive).

Lacanoodle@literature.cafe · 1 pts · 249d

Can a man not consume human flesh without being judged for once lol

Lacanoodle@literature.cafe · 2 pts · 1y

I have always been fascinated and intrigued by cannibalism. Would love to try it

agent_nycto@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 265d

You had me at eat someone, don't need to threaten me with it. Assuming there's no legal repercussions. Would I have to prepare the person myself? Do I know the person? Since these are variables not covered in the question I'd say I could just get a meal prepared by Hannibal the once and be done with it.

asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev · 1 pts · 1y

Starve to death. Though I might not be able to control myself when starvation takes over my mind, so I can't guarantee that.

amzd@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 1y

You literally eat someone three times a day, only difference is their species.