Row major huh

264 points · 14 comments · view on lemmy.world

14 Comments

Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 1y

A matrix is already wearing chaps and needs no additional leg wear.

NorthWestWind@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 1y

Wearable for infinite matrices

Zkuld@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 1y

Clearly would have one leg per column - joint at the top row

Lucien@mander.xyz · 11 pts · 1y

C vs Fortran

69420@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 1y (1 reply)

My matrices wear Hilbert Pants

OpenStars@piefed.social · 8 pts · 1y

Both - one leg each way.

lukstru@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 1y

That is a pant, not pants

mumblerfish@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y

If either, a symmetric matrix would stop being symmetric and would hence not be able to wear pants. With this conclusion in mind I propose that symmetric matrices are from now on called naked matrices instead.

OmegaLemmy@discuss.online · 4 pts · 1y

Why are we not considering the matrix as a whole, but as a fucking snake or something?

driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br · 4 pts · 1y (3 replies)

It would wear it in the direction of the matrix determinant calculation, the right leg on the positive direction and the left leg on the negative

match@pawb.social · 4 pts · 1y

eigenpants

ftbd@feddit.org · 1 pts · 1y (1 reply)

How would that work? Determinants are calculated recursively

driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br · 2 pts · 1y

It's have pants recursively too.