This was, logically, a very badly written article. If anything, reading this article steers me towards breaking encryption, a position I would never take.
Encryption doesn't abuse kids; pedophiles do. There're plenty of documented ones in office actually voting for the removal of your (human) rights to privacy.
16 Comments
BlueEther@no.lastname.nz · 23 pts · 1y
Fuck reading a website that upts a popup that puts a rant about my hardware across 1/4 of their content
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 1y
I like how the website doesn’t even work anymore.
eldavi@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 1y
seems to work fine
blenderdumbass@px.madiator.com · 1 pts · 1y
Let me guess, you got the iWarning? lol
phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 1y
Bad article, but the point does stand: breaking encryption is stupid, and csam is just an excuse, nothing more, no politician gives a shit about kids
transebding_the_binary@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 15 pts · 1y
How fucking distasteful is that cover of the article
Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 1y
The images of the kid from E.T.?
crandlecan@mander.xyz · -1 pts · 1y
Wtf I hadn't even noticed it 😡
crandlecan@mander.xyz · 11 pts · 1y
This was, logically, a very badly written article. If anything, reading this article steers me towards breaking encryption, a position I would never take.
blenderdumbass@px.madiator.com · -1 pts · 1y
Please explain
sakuragasaki46@feddit.it · 3 pts · 362d
The deal is:
When CSAM is a thing, a child has already been violated.
When conversation is being controlled, government or whoever reads all of your messages.
It means cops can CSAM you, and you can do nothing since cops are “protected people”
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone · -13 pts · 1y
i'm sure the kids who were abused would say otherwise
lukecooperatus@lemmy.ml · 14 pts · 1y
As a person who was sexually abused as a child, please have the courage to state your opinions without using abused kids as a logical crutch.
phoenixz@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 1y
Encryption abused them?
Removing encryption is opening a Pandora's box that won't protect real victims for even a second.
sakuragasaki46@feddit.it · 2 pts · 362d
victims need privacy and secure communication indeed
icelimit@lemmy.ml · 8 pts · 364d
Encryption doesn't abuse kids; pedophiles do. There're plenty of documented ones in office actually voting for the removal of your (human) rights to privacy.