Why does VLC look like this?

I installed vlc-git from the Chaotic-AUR and I am speechless.

44 points · 33 comments · view on lemmy.world

33 Comments

Rudee@lemmy.ml · 20 pts · 353d (12 replies)

Any particular reason you're getting VLC from the AUR? Even if it didn't come preinstalled, the pacman version is much better security- and stability-wise

daggermoon@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 353d (11 replies)

Yes, the version in the standard Arch repos won't play any mpeg2 videos. I have all the plugins installed so that's not the issue. I ran it in Konsole and it threw some error about VDPAU. I'm using an AMD card so I don't see why that would matter anyway. The VLC flatpak plays it fine but I have other issues with the flatpak. I'm using an RX 9070 XT.

Edit: Worth mentioning I didn't try playing mpeg2 videos in this weird git version after I saw this UI. I doubt it would fix it anyway.

N0x0n@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 353d (3 replies)

If it doesn't work, give MPV a try !

MPV is for linux what VLC is for Windows...The best player !

I was also a long time VLC player user when I was on Windows. But had also some issues and switched over to MPV !

https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/mpv/

https://mpv.io/

daggermoon@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 353d (2 replies)

I would, problem is no support for DVD and Blu-ray menus.

N0x0n@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 353d (1 reply)

Oh ? Longtime I haven't run any real DVD so I didn't though that was a thing !

Yeah if that's an important feature I guess it won't work :/

daggermoon@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 353d

Yeah, sadly. I think it used to support it but was removed for some reason. I hate relying on VLC but it's the only viable Linux option.

dhtseany@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 353d (4 replies)
daggermoon@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 353d (3 replies)

I have all the plugins installed.

dhtseany@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 353d (2 replies)

Sure but if you're using weird flatpak versions of VLC those plugins won't be invoked because the idea of a flatpak is that it brings it's own plugins. Remove the non-standard versions you installed, put back the regular vlc package from the main repo and it'll work.

HelloRoot@lemy.lol · 6 pts · 353d (1 reply)

the version in the standard Arch repos won’t play any mpeg2 videos. I have all the plugins installed

daggermoon@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 353d

I know. I installed the flatpak after trying the version in the Arch repos.

Successful_Try543@feddit.org · 1 pts · 353d (1 reply)

it threw some error about VDPAU

Have you tried usung another video output. This is what solved a similar issue for me some years ago. It was on an Intel system though.

https://wiki.videolan.org/Modify_Video_Output/

daggermoon@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 351d

I found a solution. The CachyOS repos and kernel appear to work much better on my system. Installing them and rebooting fixed my issues.

ben@feddit.dk · 15 pts · 353d

That's how VLC 4 looks like. It haven't been released yet. If you want the old UI you should look for the latest release instead (VLC 3.0.21)

Luci@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 353d

Ugh they GMONEified it :(((

swelter_spark@reddthat.com · 11 pts · 353d (5 replies)

Why does it look like what? What about its appearance are you wondering about? It looks normal to me.

Australis13@fedia.io · 6 pts · 353d (2 replies)

Is this a distro-specific UI? It certainly doesn't look like that on Windows, Debian or Linux Mint.

swelter_spark@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 348d (1 reply)

Doesn't it use whatever theme you have your DE set to by default?

Australis13@fedia.io · 2 pts · 347d

Honestly, I don't know - I haven't fiddled with the themes much on my Linux installations. All I can say is that currently, for the 3.x series, out of the box VLC looks very similar between Windows, Debian (KDE Plasma) and Linux Mint (Cinnamon) - all three of which are arguably different DEs.

A couple of other comments have flagged that this is the new 4.x UI, which certainly explains the difference.

daggermoon@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 353d (1 reply)

Is this a Mandela effect or something? Have I been using a completely different VLC from everyone else all these years?

lurch@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 353d

It has multiple GUI interfaces, plus one of them can be heavily customized and has multiple views and another one has skins to choose from.

NaibofTabr@infosec.pub · 9 pts · 353d (3 replies)

What did you want it to look like?

daggermoon@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 353d (2 replies)

I wanted it to look the way it did since I started using it at age 12. The UI is completely different.

irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 353d (1 reply)

Is there a theme setting?

daggermoon@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 353d

Yes, it changed a few things but it did not restore the UI I am familiar with.

Mwa@thelemmy.club · 8 pts · 353d (1 reply)

Maybe a upcoming ui?
Since your using the Bleeding Edge version of VLC I assume that.

daggermoon@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 353d

God, that's upsetting if true. like at least add the ability to restore the original.

daniel@federation.network · 6 pts · 353d

@daggermoon@lemmy.world vlc-git from Chaotic-AUR ships a whole new nightly build (Version 4.X). Standard VLC is still on 3.X. "Git" is usually bleeding edge and not stable.

Freakazoid@lemmings.world · 5 pts · 353d (2 replies)

I believe that's the upcoming new look of VLC 4.0 since its still in beta. Its taking them a long time though

daggermoon@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 353d (1 reply)

I can't say i'm a fan of it

Freakazoid@lemmings.world · 1 pts · 353d

I get you, a lot of features are not implemented last time I checked.

Eheran@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 353d

So the UI is still astronomically tiny in 2025 with version 4?

AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 353d

If that's how the next update is gonna look when it drops next millennia, I hope they have an option to make it look like it currently does. That minimalist look is horrible, in my opinion.