but if your hand is already on the keyboard, it's faster to type la than ll since you can move two hands faster than one (if they're doing the same movement, since with one hand you'd need to do the movement, reset and do it again)
Lulz, I tried that just to see the results. Either the terminal knows to not go crazy, or this fresh install is small enough to not take more than 5 seconds.
35 Comments
kubica@fedia.io · 53 pts · 342d
Maybe an alternative way:
Pic A - Normal image
Pic B - Same place illuminated with ultraviolet light
festnt@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 342d
yeah that would make more sense
NeilBru@lemmy.world · 33 pts · 342d
Barbarians.
ls -la, for civilized people.ayyy@sh.itjust.works · 17 pts · 342d
-lah gang rise up
laurathepluralized@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 342d
-Ahlhere! Human-readable sizes and get rid of.and..!edit: format code so ..! doesn't look funny :D
thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 342d
I like
ls -Ap, the-poption is convenient, it puts a / at the end of names if they're directories.-Ais like-abut doesn't show.and..-lis sometimes useful, but a bit cluttered and less readable (at least to me, maybe it wouldn't be if I were used to using it)AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 342d
Do you mean putting the l before the a, or just the l and a flags in general?
blx@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 341d
That's what we call
llahere at~CubitOom@infosec.pub · 31 pts · 342d
kippinitreal@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 342d
Showing what's in the cupboards & drawers is more like
ls -Rone_knight_scripting@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 342d
I like the
laalias.carl_the_grackle@lemmy.zip · 15 pts · 342d
llso you don't even have to move your fingerSomethingBurger@jlai.lu · 6 pts · 342d
PS1=$(ls -a)festnt@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 342d
but if your hand is already on the keyboard, it's faster to type la than ll since you can move two hands faster than one (if they're doing the same movement, since with one hand you'd need to do the movement, reset and do it again)
one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 342d
Doesn't show dotfiles.
Ephera@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 342d
Depends on the distro how that alias is defined (if it is defined)...
one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 342d
That is true, but I would define standard practice like this:
ls -l=llAndls -la=laEphera@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 342d
Yeah, fair enough.
SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org · 2 pts · 342d
But I have 10 of those to type with?
Ziglin@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 340d
lxxce2AAb@feddit.dk · 11 pts · 342d
"So that's where all my stuff went!"
padraig@caint.ie · 10 pts · 342d
speed through the house with
ncduJustinTheGM@ttrpg.network · 6 pts · 342d
I'm an
ls -alhguy, myself.thaklor@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 342d
Human-readable? What, are you some kind of human?
debil@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 342d
To see where's the most recent shit cause that's what I'm interested in.
krunklom@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 342d
Is -alR killed my parents
burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 342d
Lulz, I tried that just to see the results. Either the terminal knows to not go crazy, or this fresh install is small enough to not take more than 5 seconds.
Lembot_0004@discuss.online · 4 pts · 342d
KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol · 2 pts · 342d
.trash
DeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 341d
ls -halcupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 341d
alias dir="ls"dan69@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 342d
ls -ha.. is Linux laughing at my mess..???
BCsven@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 342d
Wait till they try ls -laz
yogsototh@programming.dev · 1 pts · 342d
s/ls/ls -1/
savvywolf@pawb.social · 1 pts · 339d
Average xdg noncompliance moment.
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 342d
man i just figured out DOS in the 80s i'm slow okay