ausgestattet mit einer Ray-Ban-Brille und einem denkbar unsinnigen Spruch: „I have a bike, you have a bike, so I thought we could make a race.“
Ungläubig schaue ich mich um und frage, wo er denn hier ein Fahrradrennen machen wolle. Er habe mich bloß angesprochen, weil er mich süß findet, sagt er dann. Wie unerwartet.
Ich weiß, Pick-Up-Artists sind generell nicht die hellste Leuchte in der Dunkelkammer, aber warum lädt man so ein Video hoch? Das klingt einfach nur maximal
Also really annoying that you often hardly get feedback that it is now booting up, because it takes another few seconds before the screen turns on. At various points, I've pressed that button, didn't notice that it was turning on, and then pressed it again, which turned it back off.
Yeah, I enjoyed when fish shell did their rewrite and people were arguing whether it makes sense technologically, like it's a mature codebase, so it's not likely to reduce the number of bugs and yadda yadda yadda.
None of this mattered, because fish is developed by a group of hobbyists. They didn't want to continue developing in C++, because it was a pain in the ass. And for sure, one of the reasons they wanted to switch to Rust is because it's new and exciting.
These reasons are perfectly valid, because they're volunteers. If they're not having fun, then they will just developing.
Yeah, computationally intensive stuff is going to be slow when implemented in Python. You will find lots of data science libraries for Python that do computationally intensive stuff, but they're then generally implemented in C/C++ or Rust, with only a thin API layer written in Python.
Schon auch echt ein wildes Konzept, dass man bei der Ausschreibung den freien Wettbewerb unbedingt beachten muss und deshalb auch die Anbieter nehmen muss, die den freien Wettbewerb unmöglich machen wollen.
Expecting the runtime/browser to ship a native implementation of virtually everything you might want to do in a turing-complete language, is also really not sustainable, though.
"Oven is going to be a grind, especially the first nine months or so. If work-life balance means a lot of time spent not working, it's probably not a good fit."
Oh man, someone here recently shared a blog post on startup culture in software companies, which likened software to an oven, where you'd add a specific button for a customer and that fucks up your whole architecture for years to come etc..
For just a moment, I thought this was a direct quote from that blog post.
Well, in hopes that you're not just trolling, maybe you'll believe a dictionary that "stable" is ambiguous in this context. Because this is one of the listed meanings:
(computing) Of software: established to be relatively free of bugs, as opposed to a beta version.
It also lists your meaning. I'm not saying that you're wrong. I'm saying it's ambiguous, i.e. there's two meanings that could apply here.
Well, and personally, I do feel like more people will interpret "stable" to mean bug-free here, because Debian is a piece of software to them.
Ich weiß, Pick-Up-Artists sind generell nicht die hellste Leuchte in der Dunkelkammer, aber warum lädt man so ein Video hoch? Das klingt einfach nur maximal
Also really annoying that you often hardly get feedback that it is now booting up, because it takes another few seconds before the screen turns on. At various points, I've pressed that button, didn't notice that it was turning on, and then pressed it again, which turned it back off.
Yeah, I enjoyed when fish shell did their rewrite and people were arguing whether it makes sense technologically, like it's a mature codebase, so it's not likely to reduce the number of bugs and yadda yadda yadda.
None of this mattered, because fish is developed by a group of hobbyists. They didn't want to continue developing in C++, because it was a pain in the ass. And for sure, one of the reasons they wanted to switch to Rust is because it's new and exciting.
These reasons are perfectly valid, because they're volunteers. If they're not having fun, then they will just developing.
Yeah, computationally intensive stuff is going to be slow when implemented in Python. You will find lots of data science libraries for Python that do computationally intensive stuff, but they're then generally implemented in C/C++ or Rust, with only a thin API layer written in Python.
Ich meinte proprietäre Software, also mein Kommentar hat sich auf das generelle Verständnis vor dem Urteil bezogen...
Schon auch echt ein wildes Konzept, dass man bei der Ausschreibung den freien Wettbewerb unbedingt beachten muss und deshalb auch die Anbieter nehmen muss, die den freien Wettbewerb unmöglich machen wollen.
Problem is that it's not at all trivial to implement, so it often isn't implemented.
Dachte bisher, dass es einfach nur ein Witz war. Lese deinen Pfosten und denke kurz, oh, das war doch echt?
Expecting the runtime/browser to ship a native implementation of virtually everything you might want to do in a turing-complete language, is also really not sustainable, though.
Damn, that's actually not the worst idea...
It was decided after Fukushima under Merkel.
Kind of wild that they managed to portray this loop in just 4 panels...
There's more blind folks over on Mastodon, particularly on https://dragonscave.space/ .
Maybe we can lure some of them over here, though, by using one of these: #blind
Could be that the companies they supplied to filed for damages, due to them not meeting supply targets...
Oh man, someone here recently shared a blog post on startup culture in software companies, which likened software to an oven, where you'd add a specific button for a customer and that fucks up your whole architecture for years to come etc..
For just a moment, I thought this was a direct quote from that blog post.
I mean, I'd need to fiddle around with it, but presumably this wouldn't be all too hard to script.
Just do a for-loop over the output of
ls. And then in each iteration step, you'd do something like:This will mean, though, that the file extension is part of the folder name, if you care about that.
OP should've posted to !shittyasklemmy@lemmy.ml, if they want meme answers. If they want a factual answer, then "ghosts don't exist" is that.
Well, in hopes that you're not just trolling, maybe you'll believe a dictionary that "stable" is ambiguous in this context. Because this is one of the listed meanings:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/stable#Adjective
It also lists your meaning. I'm not saying that you're wrong. I'm saying it's ambiguous, i.e. there's two meanings that could apply here.
Well, and personally, I do feel like more people will interpret "stable" to mean bug-free here, because Debian is a piece of software to them.