tbf it is a screenshot of a porn scene. i checked via reverse image search... for science and then i wanked either way. the penis touching is implied in the context of this meme. in the context of the scene it wasnt just "implied" "touching".
so yeah, its literally porn and my conclusion is thats a pretty valid use of the nsfw tag. while i'm not a prude i can think of enough situations where i would be glad when i dont have some explaining to do. i first didnt pick up on it and also thought of a stock photo. but the pretty visible underwear of the happy pumpkin lady can be a dead giveaway that its porn.
I don’t think this is an image that you could view openly in a regular workplace, even if there is no dick and balls in the image. It’s a raunchy screenshot from a porno.
This meme does not make a lot of sense, actually. The thing is, Canonical is "forcing" Snap onto users via Ubuntu, but most users hate it, and also Snap's backend is proprietary. But according to this meme, users are liking ubuntu's snap, but canonical is unaware? Idk, I liked it and I posted it.
The young man has cut a hole into the pumpkin and then inserted his erect penis into it. The young lady is reaching inside to grasp said penis. The older lady looks on, possibly unaware of the depth of the exchange.
nnnnnnnoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo how do i make it not show thumbnails?!?
31 Comments
Phineaz@feddit.org · 19 pts · 330d
I was confused, why this was NSFW. To be fair, it is fairly early here right now, but still.
nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de · 28 pts · 330d
It is implied that the girl is touching the boy's penis.
Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world · 45 pts · 330d
We have to NSFW things because of the implication now?
Hond@piefed.social · 32 pts · 330d
tbf it is a screenshot of a porn scene. i checked via reverse image search... for science and then i wanked either way. the penis touching is implied in the context of this meme. in the context of the scene it wasnt just "implied" "touching".
so yeah, its literally porn and my conclusion is thats a pretty valid use of the nsfw tag. while i'm not a prude i can think of enough situations where i would be glad when i dont have some explaining to do. i first didnt pick up on it and also thought of a stock photo. but the pretty visible underwear of the happy pumpkin lady can be a dead giveaway that its porn.
foggy@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 330d
Send this meme to your HR department and ask if it is safe for work
eager_eagle@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 330d
yeah, gotta play safe!
KaChilde@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 330d
I don’t think this is an image that you could view openly in a regular workplace, even if there is no dick and balls in the image. It’s a raunchy screenshot from a porno.
Phineaz@feddit.org · 8 pts · 330d
Yeah, I figured that out after a while, but um thanks for the clarification.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 330d
or she's getting some candy.
ehyuman@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 18 pts · 330d
can I get that sauce?
TheBat@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 330d
IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works · 20 pts · 330d
That's a suspiciously specific guess.
eager_eagle@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 330d
"according to my dog"
testykitchen@lemmynsfw.com · 15 pts · 330d
NSFW Sauce
Chivera@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 330d
Bless your kind heart
DrDystopia@lemy.lol · 2 pts · 329d
This video is very improper, but in the context of the question, very proper.
Gonzako@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 330d
I don't get it. Mind explaining?
nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de · 31 pts · 330d
This meme does not make a lot of sense, actually. The thing is, Canonical is "forcing" Snap onto users via Ubuntu, but most users hate it, and also Snap's backend is proprietary. But according to this meme, users are liking ubuntu's snap, but canonical is unaware? Idk, I liked it and I posted it.
jaybone@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 330d
Maybe it would make more sense if the guy was the user and the girl was snap? Or the pumpkin was Ubuntu? Idk I can’t make it make sense.
WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 330d
Makes sense to me—Ubuntu forcing users to grab snap packages, and Canonical thinks it’s cute.
jaybone@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 329d
This is why porn is never a good analogy for anything.
OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 330d
The young man has cut a hole into the pumpkin and then inserted his erect penis into it. The young lady is reaching inside to grasp said penis. The older lady looks on, possibly unaware of the depth of the exchange.
Successful_Try543@feddit.org · 5 pts · 330d
Probably a modification of this.
Gonzako@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 330d
that I got but not the labels I get
Successful_Try543@feddit.org · 3 pts · 330d
I also think, the facial expression of the young woman shows too much joy for the unwanted present snaps are.
pewpew@feddit.it · 9 pts · 330d
The pumpkin is the apt repo and what she's getting is Snap packages
mat@jlai.lu · 7 pts · 330d
Thanks
festnt@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 326d
if anyone wants the image's source: warning: nsfw (it's literally just porn)
nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 326d
Benefits of using Voyager. I can see the thumbnails.
festnt@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 325d
nnnnnnnoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo how do i make it not show thumbnails?!?
nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 324d
By not hyperlinking it, maybe?
festnt@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 324d
nah that would still show it i think, and it wouldnt work ti say "its porn" and give a youtube link