:: context ::
https://piefed.social/post/1348319
Not the user fault. Someone used some blur effect to hide the watermark, probably with Filmora or a similar editor. This is what the future looks like: Blurred or strangely zoomed ai slop video to hide watermarks.
probable source: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPg7qkLEzK-/ (check the comments)
44 Comments
kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 120 pts · 338d
damn this is the first time I got genuinely tricked by an ai video.
feels bad
A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world · 56 pts · 338d
It's pretty convincing to be fair
Can't have shit in Detroit
Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 30 pts · 338d
I got tricked too. Knew it would happen eventually. Even if theyre not perfect im not thoroughly analyzing every 5 seconds long funny video. I hate this timeline.
ragingHungryPanda@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com · 17 pts · 338d
I got tricked by one the other day. It even had the sora logo on it, but I thought that was just another website.
UltraBlack@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 338d
AI slop is getting shockingly accurate.
I hope it'll destroy our climate really quikckly so big AI won't be able to make it accurately reflect reality!!
REDACTED@infosec.pub · 1 pts · 337d
It doesn't stand even close to real co2 producers. Realistically it will have insignifact effect. Think about the power your car uses to move your ass to work and back, and then think about the power usage of a GPU, and not even personal cars take the lead.
Last I checked, data centers barely made to the table of things accelerating climate change.
I mean, think about the GPU usage hours for when you're gaming. Realistically gamers consume far more electricity, but I don't think anyone is saying gamers cause climate change.
UltraBlack@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 337d
AI is a huge waste of energy.
Gaming? Debatable .
NateNate60@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 338d
Woe will be the day when humans can no longer determine whether a video is AI or not, even after careful analysis. I wouldn't have caught this one either but if given the fact that it is suspected of AI, it isn't hard to prove it. The timestamp in the top left corner is off. 22-13-43-21 is a nonsensical date and the time jumps from 23:15:07 to 23:15:98 then 23:15:59 then 23:15:54
REDACTED@infosec.pub · 2 pts · 337d
That you know of*. As someone who works with AI alot (including my own local models), I see AI stuff pretty much every day. It's getting quite hard to spot it even with trained eye, I'm not sure how things will be in another 2 years.
salvaria@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 34 pts · 338d
Hey OP, if you want to include an alternative frontend for those without an Instagram account, I found the video (and comments) available here: https://imginn.com/p/DPg7qkLEzK-/
ekZepp@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 338d
đ
s@piefed.world · 27 pts · 338d
Ugh⌠it could be because Iâm a bit groggy but nothing about the video seemed off to me right away. I didnât even notice the blurred watermark. After looking closely, the Halloween animatronic has 6 fingers on one hand, the area of the animatronic behind the table looks very flatly colored, and the progression of the timer in the top left is not sensical.
Those who did right away notice the video was AI, what stood out to you? I feel like we may need teams of people pointing out suspicious aspects of internet content in the future, but at the efficiency that AI content is generated we might just end up finding ourselves automating the detection process with AI scanners trained to analyze for AI content.
Hackworth@sh.itjust.works · 21 pts · 338d
s@piefed.world · 3 pts · 338d
Oh yeah I definitely didnât expect any automated AI detection system to be as accurate as a trained human, but I expect corporations to replace the trained humans in the long run to save money and increase rate of output at the great expense of the quality of the output. To get correct results, weâd need a platoon of Captain Disillusions, not just some Joe Schmoe or Robo Joe Schmoe.
Lumisal@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 338d
To be me it was the way the possum jumped. They don't cartoonishly move their limbs like that, but jump similarly to an Armadillo.
... But not everyone has seen a real one jump to be fair.
Sirence@feddit.org · 7 pts · 338d
The time, I was trying to parse what date but it made no sense with four numbers, then on the time the seconds jumped to 98 seconds and I was like wait a second...
khannie@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 338d
Ok. Now we're at 99 seconds. What's next?
Sirence@feddit.org · 2 pts · 337d
Boom
lechekaflan@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 336d
The date and time stamp.
edgyspazkid@lemmy.wtf · 24 pts · 338d
Guys, this is getting really closeâletâs go! Except weâre not in this picture; those are SamâŻAltman and JeffâŻBezos after a skinâreplacement procedure and gender transition to a woman.
For all the poor, weâre getting turned into fucking human cubes mushed with fastâfashion clothes.
Wispy2891@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 337d
And of course the description of that insta post is the usual bot scam
scytale@piefed.zip · 12 pts · 338d
I saw a similar video but with a raccoon instead. Wow, I wonder if that was AI as well, or if it was the original this one was patterned after.
usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 338d
That might be why this one is so convincing? If it's just slightly altering instead of inventing whole cloth
carrylex@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 338d
Jyrdano@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 337d
Yeah this was the first time -I know of- that Ive been fooled by AI. Feels bad man.
samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 337d
It's only going to get harder to detect as time goes on.
joyjoy@lemmy.zip · 11 pts · 338d
I dislike every Sora short I see. I don't dislike most videos.
the_q@lemmy.zip · 25 pts · 338d
don@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 338d
As long as you donât interact with the video in any way, because using the like/dislike button and leaving comments of any kind are considered to be engagement and only cause the algorithm to recommend it all the more.
yermaw@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 338d
So does Reddits "never show me this sub again, seriously, I want it blocked and hidden."
Blaster_M@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 338d
Rather impressive how well made the video looks at first glance. Only the timestamp reveals its artificial, but I'm sure enough plays and sleuthing you'll see other minor details.
QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 338d
there's a guy on Instagram that specializes in calling out AI videos, they're usually passable on first glance but not like surprising. This one is an outliar because it's SO REAL looking. Normally a video is in the daytime so you can see far away stuff shifting around "sora noise" is what he calls it
chunes@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 337d
I've been fooled by every one that has been posted. It's really good, dudes. It might be over
somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 338d
reported
altphoto@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 335d
Oh, Sora Aoi?
Grimy@lemmy.world · -13 pts · 338d
There is a group of idiots that will down vote anything related to AI without thought, then bitch and moan in the comments about it on top of it.
If you want people to properly tag their stuff, they need to think it's not going to get down voted and harrassed just because of the tag. I tag mine anyways (I don't really post much tbh) but I understand why people don't.
The knee jerk reaction of certain members of this community is encouraging hidding the fact that it is AI.
Also, if you like something but change your mind just because you learned it was made the "bad" way, when it's only stupid memes and quirky videos, you are a tool.
0range@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 pts · 338d
What's the value add here exactly? Like, why should I give an AI post upvotes when if I wanted to see AI content I could just cut out the middleman and prompt it into existence myself?
Grimy@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 338d
I mean, you are able to type on the keyboard but I doubt that means you want to sit there thinking of jokes to type out all the time. And even if you loved posting written jokes, you would still probably enjoy reading the jokes of others and upvoting them.
chunes@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 337d
Your analogy is spot-on and people downvote anyway. Gotta love lemmy
Comrade_Spood@quokk.au · 7 pts · 338d
Or, and hear me out, maybe just stop posting AI content cause clearly people don't want it, or get over the criticism. People are going to react the way you dont like because many people, myself included, find it unethical. Like yeah, if I see something and like it, but find out it was made in a way I find unethical I am going to think lesser of it. Its called following your own principles. Like if I watch a youtuber and like their content, but then find out they plagiarized it, I am not going to like that youtuber anymore. They did something I find ethically immoral and I am not going to support it.
Grimy@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 338d
That's completely fine until you start brigading and going in the comments and bitching every single time.
There are certain things I don't really like seeing much of. Because I'm a mature person, I simply block the subs and the user's that post it out of those subs.
It's also not genocide, it's not unethical for everyone. Some of us have opinions that are more complex then regurgitating what copyright companies told us to think. For example, stuff like reposting is way more unethical but you aren't actually thinking, grow up.
kadu@scribe.disroot.org · 2 pts · 338d
I will forever downvote, mock, shame, laugh at, and ostracize you AI dorks. Fuck AI.
Grimy@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 337d
Hence why I'm saying people aren't going to tell you it's AI and will even go out of their way to trick you. Because of the prevalent attitude towards it, it's become a waiting game to see how many months it takes before it's just stupidly hard to tell if it's AI or not.
chunes@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 336d
This is just the new "digital art isn't real art!" I remember that back in the 90s. It'll blow over in a few years and these dorks will pretend they weren't cringe about it.
hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 337d
People clearly hate these. Why bother? If you're so "smart" just go somewhere else that suits you. And fuck AI slop.
Grimy@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 337d
Stop being a baby. Your technophobia doesn't dictate the rules of the whole fediverse. Brigade and gatekeep like a child all you want, it's not going away.