Art in general is about showing your personality and how you see the world. AI only follows instructions and tries to do everything so perfectly that it becomes life-less.
Bud there's no way I'm getting into a slapfight with someone that either:
Doesn't understand that the creative output in your scenario comes from the artist not the commissioner.
Does understand that, but managed to articulate their point that badly.
I don't have much self respect, but I'm not spending what little I do have on something this goofy.
(Edit: And who apparently is that bad at articulating their point, but characterizes the people falling victim to your lack of capacity for eloquence "dumbasses"...)
That's the problem - it was ambiguously phrased. Multiple (correct-as-read) interpretations could be drawn from it, but that appears to have unleashed their ire.
That's the damn point, my comment is directed at uncreative prompters who think the dice roll machine gifts them creativity, and you misread me badly. Was the context not enough?
Your comment was ambiguous - I agree with the sentiment now that you've added the clarifying edit, but your behavior in response to the ambiguity you failed to identify is icky.
Reminds me of that post I can't find right now about how a company made an AI comic "art" competition or whatever and the person who won actually drew it themselves
24 Comments
Pandantic@midwest.social · 131 pts · 332d
Real photographers are stealing our awards. -Ai “artists”
Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone · -3 pts · 331d
i dun think anyone evr said dis - besides mayb as a joke-
Omer_Ash@lemmy.world · 84 pts · 332d
Art in general is about showing your personality and how you see the world. AI only follows instructions and tries to do everything so perfectly that it becomes life-less.
Carnelian@lemmy.world · 88 pts · 332d
Pretty sure art is about maximizing shareholder value by delivering a minimally viable product
bob_lemon@feddit.org · 18 pts · 332d
Depends on your definition of ART
Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 331d
That is the most disgusting description of "art" I have ever read.
Carnelian@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 331d
Thank you lol, indeed it is because you have read a joke
Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 331d
Some jokes make you laugh at its whimsy. Some jokes make you laugh at the absurdity of reality laid bare.
The joke had its intended effect.
Natanael@infosec.pub · 8 pts · 331d
AI art with only prompts is no different in terms of creative output from just commissioning art from an artist.
Edit: you dumbasses, I'm calling the prompters completely uncreative and fully dependent on others to look good
Warl0k3@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 331d
I... hmm.
(edit: original text was "you are so close")
Natanael@infosec.pub · 0 pts · 331d
You need to read what I wrote again because you flew by my point with light-years of distance
Warl0k3@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 331d
Bud there's no way I'm getting into a slapfight with someone that either:
I don't have much self respect, but I'm not spending what little I do have on something this goofy.
(Edit: And who apparently is that bad at articulating their point, but characterizes the people falling victim to your lack of capacity for eloquence "dumbasses"...)
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 331d
I understood their point just fine fwiw
Warl0k3@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 331d
That's the problem - it was ambiguously phrased. Multiple (correct-as-read) interpretations could be drawn from it, but that appears to have unleashed their ire.
Natanael@infosec.pub · 1 pts · 331d
That's the damn point, my comment is directed at uncreative prompters who think the dice roll machine gifts them creativity, and you misread me badly. Was the context not enough?
Warl0k3@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 331d
Your comment was ambiguous - I agree with the sentiment now that you've added the clarifying edit, but your behavior in response to the ambiguity you failed to identify is icky.
Hadriscus@jlai.lu · 1 pts · 331d
The output of a prompt isn't creative, it's algorithmic and lifeless. How can you compare it to an actual work of art commissioned from an artist ?
Oh wait..... did you mean the act of commissioning art ? then sure... but what's the point of stating that ? did you write this for the gotcha ?
Natanael@infosec.pub · 3 pts · 331d
Yes, the act of commissioning. That's the whole point. Prompters don't do anything interesting.
A_norny_mousse@feddit.org · 41 pts · 332d
I hope he did that on purpose.
PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de · 51 pts · 332d
how would they do it by accident?
Jankatarch@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 332d
They could have called the competition something like "aries" instead of anything self-explanatory and photogeapher didn't know it was AI.
I nearly joined a gemini vibe-coding event because of this "modern title" trend.
PlayfulWitch@piefed.blahaj.zone · 18 pts · 332d
Reminds me of that post I can't find right now about how a company made an AI comic "art" competition or whatever and the person who won actually drew it themselves
Deadeyegai@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 332d
Talk about an unexpected Uno reverse!
Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 331d
seems... reasonabl?....
dogs0n@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 331d