Those of you that are voting down this article, could you please explain why? I don't understand why four women discussing how to make running better is such a divisive or problematic topic.
Hey, I'd love to read it, and I haven't downvoted, but the article is behind a paywall. A lot of people have some very...visceral...reactions to that, even in contexts where being opposed to it is far less rational than in a running community.
@Zagorath@okwithmydecay not only that - it’s a substack paywall. Many of us won’t subscribe to free substack blogs let only pay for them; if you don’t know why a quick search should make that clear.
5 Comments
okwithmydecay@leminal.space · 3 pts · 344d
Those of you that are voting down this article, could you please explain why? I don't understand why four women discussing how to make running better is such a divisive or problematic topic.
Zagorath@aussie.zone · 4 pts · 344d
Hey, I'd love to read it, and I haven't downvoted, but the article is behind a paywall. A lot of people have some very...visceral...reactions to that, even in contexts where being opposed to it is far less rational than in a running community.
clare_hooley@mastodon.me.uk · 2 pts · 343d
@Zagorath @okwithmydecay not only that - it’s a substack paywall. Many of us won’t subscribe to free substack blogs let only pay for them; if you don’t know why a quick search should make that clear.
okwithmydecay@leminal.space · 3 pts · 343d
Thank you for clearing that up. I appreciate the explanation, and I will refrain to linking to articles that are behind Substack paywalls.
Zagorath@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 342d
fwiw I was being sincere when I said I'd love to read it. Would it be possible for you to summarise its most important points?