RFK Jr. Warns Teenagers Now Have Less Sperm Than 65-Year-Old Men
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/rfk-jr-warns-teenagers-now-have-less-sperm-than-65-year-old-men/
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/rfk-jr-warns-teenagers-now-have-less-sperm-than-65-year-old-men/
42 Comments
peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world · 50 pts · 307d
Every time I think they can't get any more stupid, they do.
yakko@feddit.uk · 27 pts · 307d
He looked about him, felt the air, looked deep within, and came to the clear realisation that what the people really deserve and crave in this political moment, is clarity and leadership on doing big cums
rozodru@piefed.social · 46 pts · 307d
yeah I'm sure THAT's the reason no one is having kids and not the fact that no one can afford to house said kids, or can afford to feed an extra mouth or two, or afford everything else thats involved in raising a child.
yeah, got it, the sperm count is down.
HubertManne@piefed.social · 4 pts · 306d
yeah aren't they worried we are rolling in abortions?
village604@adultswim.fan · 3 pts · 306d
I mean, sperm count is down and it is a problem. But it's not the reason people aren't having kids.
Drusas@fedia.io · 4 pts · 306d
Debatable.
RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip · 37 pts · 307d
New Study: Global Fertility Rate Decline Now Linked Directly to the Commodification of Housing
dugmeup@lemmy.world · 34 pts · 307d
Oh god. I don't want to know how he conducted this research.
semisimian@startrek.website · 29 pts · 307d
Taste test.
FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 307d
Visual, he can tell the you the sperm count of any individual at twenty yards with uncanny inaccuracy.
klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe · 28 pts · 307d
RFK suckin off preteen boys and being confused.
kreskin@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 303d
Hey now, RFK wasnt sucking them off exactly, he was testing to make sure they were circumsized, and that they had a healthy sperm count. He can also tell if the kids are healthy just by looking at them. Naked, obviously.
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 307d
Still doesn't excuse the pedo in chief going after teenage girls
masterofn001@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 307d
How do you think they got the data?
(I'm sure it wasn't all just teenage girls)
kreskin@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 303d
oh hey I'd totally forgotten about that topic.
IHeartBadCode@fedia.io · 26 pts · 307d
You can't debate that. Mostly because it's just illogical altogether. It would like trying to convince someone that pasta doesn't taste like clay bricks. There's no logic to the initial argument, you can't logic that away.
Naich@lemmings.world · 27 pts · 307d
He's got a bit confused. It's the birth rate, and it's not a percent. You need a birth rate of 2.1 per person to keep the population steady. It's nothing to do with fertility, but more personal choices, like when a couple look around and think "nah, I'm not going to subject my kids to these fucking idiots".
Archer@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 307d
If I wasn’t already not having kids I definitely would have done it just to spite Paul Ryan
phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 13 pts · 307d
Yeah. Leaving aside his getting the units wrong, he's interpreting the fertility rate as is it's a direct measure of sperm viability. There might be a causal connection between the two, but conflating them like RFKJ does is idiotic.
Eq0@literature.cafe · 7 pts · 307d
Is this AI generated? It seems like such a string of random elements… I can’t help but being impressed somehow. Like, wow, this pigeon really succeeded in shitting all over the chessboard!
IHeartBadCode@fedia.io · 1 pts · 305d
Man I wish it was. It'd make more sense.
DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 307d
They really are obsessed with what people do in their bedrooms.
WindyRebel@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 306d
Yeah, because if people aren’t fucking and producing kids then they lose labor and potential profits. They also lose the help of the youngsters to ensure that they have all the lovely care to make their passing as wonderful as it can be.
It’s fucked.
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 16 pts · 306d
Allow me to buy a house where I live and I’m down to have a kid or two
Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 306d
But will you obsessively monitor their sperm?
Jerb322@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 306d
Can dude get anymore creepy!? WTF?!
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 307d
I miss when stories like this only came out of North Korea.
medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 307d
Me, too. BUT, when we read an absolutely idiotic statement from NK, we had to ask, "Wait, did the translator get that right? Nobody is that stupid, right?"
This way cuts out the middle man. Yes, they absolutely are that stupid, no question.
kreskin@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 303d
Oh man, can you imagine how the US looks to the rest of the world right now? Open and rampant corruption, pedophilia, hyper religion, war crimes, and general idiocy. If I were them I'd be fleeing the dollar and not consuming any of our media. Our soft power is plummeting through the floor right now. We are the laughingstock of the planet.
tal@lemmy.today · 13 pts · 307d
I very strongly doubt that the limiting factor on the total fertility rate is male infertility.
EDIT: Also, RFK, Jr., it's not "3.5%", "1.6%", and "2.1%". It's "3.5", "1.6", and "2.1", as in, children per woman. Okay, maybe that's being pedantic, but I'm also not the Secretary of Health and Human Services with speechwriters and a ton of experts advising me announcing focuses in national policy.
gedaliyah@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 307d
Makes sense. The 65-year-old man is a man, while 50% of the teenagers are girls/women.
Ancalagon@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 306d
Lol take that mathing and get outta here!
ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 307d
I guess there’s your reason why people aren’t having kids. I guess should should start tackling the micro plastic problem first…
JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 306d
I'm guessing his boss should know plenty about minors...
londos@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 307d
Its not biology, ya dummy.
https://lemmy.ca/post/53484820
ScrumpyDumpleskin@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 305d
There is a narrative here folks, and it's all sorts of wrong.
kreskin@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 303d
Who would want to make a kid in this right wing corrupt pedophiliac capitalist anti-environmentalist hellhole we're living in?
Sounds like child abuse even thinking about doing it.
handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 306d
Why do I believe he’s actually done extensive first hand research on this?
MrSulu@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 305d
This says more about the glory holes he visits.
Lembot_0004@discuss.online · 4 pts · 307d
Leather@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 306d
Given present circumstances I can't rule out this as astroturfing a justification for pedophelia to up birth rates.
Spacehooks@reddthat.com · 1 pts · 306d
Isn't the obvious answer because old men Are so unhealthy they cant get hard anymore vs teenage boys which keep their sperms levels down through rigorous activities?
RattlerSix@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 306d
Rotate the stock