We* emphasize exclusive access to objects (not sharing) more than we ever did.

*or they. idk.

E: clarify

10 points · 7 comments · view on lemmy.world

7 Comments

6nk06@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 274d (1 reply)

What is exclusive? Relics and sacred temples were pretty exclusive in the past.

Nikko882@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 274d

I assumed op meant exclusive access in the sense of "this is mine, and nobody else is allowed to use it".

Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 274d

More than ever? Probably not.

Theft has pretty much always been a crime. Picking an apple from the King's orchard could get you killed in some places.

I'd say it's probably about the same, aside from a few specific cultures that weren't built on the concept of property.

myplacedk@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 274d (2 replies)

Who does? What kind of objects?

"Share economy" seems bigger than ever to me. Just a few years ago it wasn't even a thing.

entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 pts · 274d (1 reply)

Bigger than ever in post industrial society, maybe. Pre-industrial times almost everyone shared almost everything. The ones who didn't share were rich, and even they often would invite guests to stay for a whole season semi-regularly because of their ridiculously big houses and desire for entertainment.

myplacedk@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 273d

True, I didn't think that far back.

AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 274d

Tragedy of the commons. As communities grow bigger and more distant, commons become more open to abuse