The bunny has pancakes on a plate and is eating them.
Ralph appears and his hand is stretched towards a plate that is in front of the bunny. What's he doing? The bunny had pancakes in the first panel, that's where we've seen a plate before, must be the same plate, he must be taking the plate (from the bunny's mouth, no less).
That's what the order of the panels suggests. It's bad panelling and the images need to be the other way around. It works in a movie but that's because we can see the movement.
Also unclear on that. But what is clear is OP apparently expects everyone to re-make a funny meme that everyone in the world can understand because they have to make a mountain out of a molehill and lack the imagination necessary to fill in the bl*nks.
Or just find the original. Or superimpose the uncensored word over the censored word. Better yet, you don’t have to remake or modify OC — why build our forum’s foundation on some other site’s works?
understand
I can understand just fine. The censorship is just horribly tacky and is a form of compliance with corporate agenda. If you are drawing from these media, then you are condoning that rewrite of language.
In a world where people use AI to generate the stupidest nonsense because they don't want to bother opening an image editor and "it's just a meme brah", you expect people to to hunt down "the original" because someone put a dot on a word to farm outrage engagement?
To most people, the core value of a meme is not diminished by a random speck of colour on it. If someone's found a clever way to express something that I agree strongly with, I don't give much of a fuck if it says "this motherfucking asshole needs to fucking d*e" or "this motherfucking asshole needs to fucking die".
Who in the world invests that much time for a fucking meme? To me, this whole discussion feels very silly. When you meet someone who uses expressions like "gosh darnit" instead of "god dammit", do you make a fuss about that too? I do understand that it really is about being annoyed of some platforms requiring their users to self-censor. But still... complaining this much about something you clearly understand and don't have to do yourself just because you want the full, uncensored profanity to experience the full freedom Lemmy offers feels so pointless.
26 Comments
Lumidaub@feddit.org · 21 pts · 253d
What is happening here? Is Ralph taking the pancakes away?
Emi@ani.social · 13 pts · 253d
He's feeding the bunny pancakes.
Lumidaub@feddit.org · 6 pts · 253d
That's what the order of the panels suggests. It's bad panelling and the images need to be the other way around. It works in a movie but that's because we can see the movement.
Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it · 30 pts · 253d
Fixed meme for you
Lumidaub@feddit.org · -4 pts · 253d
Oooooh 🤩 now I get it 🥳 haha thank you ❤️❤️❤️
/S
IcedRaktajino@startrek.website · 8 pts · 253d
Also unclear on that. But what is clear is OP apparently expects everyone to re-make a funny meme that everyone in the world can understand because they have to make a mountain out of a molehill and lack the imagination necessary to fill in the bl*nks.
s@piefed.world · 13 pts · 253d
Or just find the original. Or superimpose the uncensored word over the censored word. Better yet, you don’t have to remake or modify OC — why build our forum’s foundation on some other site’s works?
I can understand just fine. The censorship is just horribly tacky and is a form of compliance with corporate agenda. If you are drawing from these media, then you are condoning that rewrite of language.
Lumidaub@feddit.org · 4 pts · 253d
In a world where people use AI to generate the stupidest nonsense because they don't want to bother opening an image editor and "it's just a meme brah", you expect people to to hunt down "the original" because someone put a dot on a word to farm outrage engagement?
s@piefed.world · 5 pts · 253d
Who exactly is forcing people to repost the memes they find? If something is bad, simply do not do it if you have the choice.
Lumidaub@feddit.org · 8 pts · 253d
To most people, the core value of a meme is not diminished by a random speck of colour on it. If someone's found a clever way to express something that I agree strongly with, I don't give much of a fuck if it says "this motherfucking asshole needs to fucking d*e" or "this motherfucking asshole needs to fucking die".
s@piefed.world · 0 pts · 253d
And you don’t care or question why somebody would have said “d*e”?
Lumidaub@feddit.org · 2 pts · 253d
Of course I do and the answer is engagement farming.
red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 253d
Who in the world invests that much time for a fucking meme? To me, this whole discussion feels very silly. When you meet someone who uses expressions like "gosh darnit" instead of "god dammit", do you make a fuss about that too? I do understand that it really is about being annoyed of some platforms requiring their users to self-censor. But still... complaining this much about something you clearly understand and don't have to do yourself just because you want the full, uncensored profanity to experience the full freedom Lemmy offers feels so pointless.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 253d
Lotta words for simping for corporate censorship
Fedi-bitch@piefed.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 253d
https://youtu.be/2HlS24uvVYc
ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 253d
Block threads. It will destroy the community. "Embrace, extend, exterminate" in action.
boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 253d
I thought Lemmy, Kbin, piefed are threadiverse because of the reddit and hackernews style threads.
ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 253d
I mean Threads, the product from Facebook meta. What do you mean?
boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 8 pts · 253d
Post said threadiverse, not Threads. Threadiverse refers to the part of fediverse that has threads. Such as Lemmy.
ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 252d
Oops. :P
InnerScientist@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 253d
Larry@lemmy.zip · 23 pts · 253d
s@piefed.world · 7 pts · 253d
It’s a tongue-in-cheek neologistic derogatory term
TheBat@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 253d
EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 253d
Rule 42. You’re banned for using inappropriate or uncultured language.
TheBat@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 253d
thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org · 2 pts · 253d
don't worry.... it will be fine
snooggums@piefed.world · 1 pts · 253d
Antcheeks, obviously.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 253d
"asterick" is not a thing.