I'm in an anarcho syndicalist union and we used to promote training course. In the end, those training are mainly done by minorized people (based on gender, race or social class). Men having courses for unions or other proletarian organization are paid. This is discrimination, in which benevolent took it parts.
You don't choose you mentality, you deal with your condition. Now, we pay people on a dedicated solidarity fund for they chosen collective, such as a strike fund. In the future, when this conditions will evolve, we will stop using money.
Relying on individualists means is counterproductive
So I'm worth whatever I think I'm worth? I think I'm worth the effort I put into my community of people and contributions to society in the form of my work.
Capitalism rewards one group. People who generate large amounts of money as quickly as possible, regardless of the affect their actions have on any person or group of people who aren't exceptionally wealthy.
Sure, and if you look a bit beyond that you'll notice that the class that does this is the capitalist class, who recieve their vast plunder not through labor, but ownership of capital.
Don't people who work harder deserve more pay?
I'm not saying capitalists work hard. I just mean does a full time worker doing the same job as a part time worker deserve more wealth than the part time worker?
Eventually the goal is to work as people want to to satisfy everyone's needs, but between now and whenever that's achieved, people will likely continue to get paid more for more intense or moe trained labor. My point is that the variance between wages and the amount capitalists rake in is astronomical.
Yep, how ever the kangaroo court that is lemmy has ruled that despite your work ethics and day in day out efforts to be a contributor to society. You are worth the same as the crack head who stole your rose trellis for scrap metal last summer.
21 Comments
bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 18 pts · 275d
Is this a thought crime in the US?
FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 274d
SCotUS will be ruling on if people convicted of talking shit about capitalism can face the death penalty sometime in February.
causepix@lemmy.ml · 10 pts · 274d
Put it as your linkedin banner and see what happens
RiverRock@lemmy.ml · 13 pts · 275d
In a fever swamp of death cult propaganda, practice good psychological hygiene
BannedVoice@lemmy.zip · 12 pts · 275d
umbrella@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 275d
menas@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 274d
I'm in an anarcho syndicalist union and we used to promote training course. In the end, those training are mainly done by minorized people (based on gender, race or social class). Men having courses for unions or other proletarian organization are paid. This is discrimination, in which benevolent took it parts.
You don't choose you mentality, you deal with your condition. Now, we pay people on a dedicated solidarity fund for they chosen collective, such as a strike fund. In the future, when this conditions will evolve, we will stop using money.
Relying on individualists means is counterproductive
Tabooki@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 274d
No it equals wealth
VlerrieBR@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 274d
So I'm worth whatever I think I'm worth? I think I'm worth the effort I put into my community of people and contributions to society in the form of my work.
minorkeys@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 275d
Then provide me a reasonable means of providing myself the means to keep existing, maybe get a dog.
vk6flab@lemmy.radio · -12 pts · 275d
And precisely how will you achieve the minimum standard of sustaining human life .. trivial things like food and lodging?
Zombie@feddit.uk · 27 pts · 275d
It doesn't say refuse work. It says refuse the concept that a person's worth is linked to how much or what type of work they perform.
Worth as in human worth, not monetary value. Social standing, respect, etc
Cypher@lemmy.world · -16 pts · 274d
Cowbee@lemmy.ml · 18 pts · 274d
Sure, but capitalism rewards the most the people that do the least.
FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world · -7 pts · 274d
Capitalism rewards one group. People who generate large amounts of money as quickly as possible, regardless of the affect their actions have on any person or group of people who aren't exceptionally wealthy.
Cowbee@lemmy.ml · 15 pts · 274d
Sure, and if you look a bit beyond that you'll notice that the class that does this is the capitalist class, who recieve their vast plunder not through labor, but ownership of capital.
pineapple@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 274d
Don't people who work harder deserve more pay? I'm not saying capitalists work hard. I just mean does a full time worker doing the same job as a part time worker deserve more wealth than the part time worker?
Cowbee@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 273d
Eventually the goal is to work as people want to to satisfy everyone's needs, but between now and whenever that's achieved, people will likely continue to get paid more for more intense or moe trained labor. My point is that the variance between wages and the amount capitalists rake in is astronomical.
_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus · 13 pts · 274d
Cypher@lemmy.world · -10 pts · 274d
_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus · 11 pts · 274d
Cypher@lemmy.world · -11 pts · 274d
_cryptagion@anarchist.nexus · 9 pts · 274d
RiverRock@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 274d
Yeah man Elon Musk really contributes to society
Mpatch@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 274d
Yep, how ever the kangaroo court that is lemmy has ruled that despite your work ethics and day in day out efforts to be a contributor to society. You are worth the same as the crack head who stole your rose trellis for scrap metal last summer.
Cypher@lemmy.world · -5 pts · 274d
abbadon420@sh.itjust.works · -6 pts · 275d
Of course you can just simply build your own house and grow your own food. Easy as what. /s