Experts Explore New Mushroom Which Causes Fairytale-Like Hallucinations
https://nhmu.utah.edu/articles/experts-explore-new-mushroom-which-causes-fairytale-hallucinations
https://nhmu.utah.edu/articles/experts-explore-new-mushroom-which-causes-fairytale-hallucinations
35 Comments
RebekahWSD@lemmy.world · 47 pts · 264d
...I wouldn't mind exploring a fairy tale as long as it wasn't one of those old old fairy tales that end my death.
ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world · 36 pts · 264d
Yeah, that would be a Grimm fate...
LiveLM@lemmy.zip · 26 pts · 264d
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 264d
My life is a kid's TV show, but the author is german.
AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 264d
There's a taqueria that recently opened near me that has what appears to be a massive taco. They call it a Kika. None of my friends understand why I keep calling them a German Mexican Restaurant.
otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 264d
☝🏼 My immediate thought.
Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social · 1 pts · 262d
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 20 pts · 264d
Neuroscientists developed a trans cranial magnetic helmet that when focused on the right part of the brain, induces religious visions typical of those described by Catholic saints. Suggests that some religious visionaries may have had brain damage or a brain parasite.
Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com · 11 pts · 264d
I think more likely that they had techniques and a way of life that caused this part of the brain to fire. Typically, visionary saints lived lives of extreme deprivation and constant meditative states, which probably led to a very specific kind of brain chemistry.
harmbugler@piefed.social · 2 pts · 264d
Indeed, many religions specifically induce these effects. For example, Dark retreat.
moonlight@fedia.io · 4 pts · 264d
Whoa, I'd really like to try that.
jerkface@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 264d
This is not yet established science. See, eg, https://www.bioedonline.org/news/nature-news-archive/electrical-brainstorms-busted-source-ghosts/
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 264d
Did you read that?
*Susan Blackmore, a psychologist based in Bristol, UK, is also reluctant to give up on the theory just yet. She has firsthand experience of Persinger's methods. "When I went to Persinger's lab and underwent his procedures I had the most extraordinary experiences I've ever had," she says. "I'll be surprised if it turns out to be a placebo effect."
She too thinks that the Swedish researchers may have used magnetic fields that varied subtly from those of Persinger. "But double-blind experiments will ultimately give us the final answer," she says.*
Persinger's work was reproduced in 2014.
Tinoca, Carlos A; Ortiz, João PL (2014). "Magnetic stimulation of the temporal cortex: a partial "God helmet" replication study". Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research. 5 (3): 234–257.
The only "controversy" was a single Swedish group who did not follow the same protocol (why?) then claimed it was not reproducible. Persinger's work triggered a lot of religious people. He died in 2018. His central theory is that humans evolved a part of brain to deal with their own mortality when they evolved a certain level of intelligence.
jerkface@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 263d
You mean the only attempt to recreate it failed. Only one group has shown these results. The results are not universally accepted, and indeed are contested by a second group. That is not established science, it's still a subject of considerable research. You certainly can't walk into a commercial clinic and order a religious experience like I'm certain you could if this were nailed down.
drasglaf@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 264d
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · 8 pts · 264d
What's the psychoactive chemical?
ElderReflections@fedia.io · 22 pts · 264d
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com · 14 pts · 264d
That's cool means that its not illegal
frunch@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 264d
...yet 🫠
AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space · 4 pts · 264d
In the UK it would be. Anything psychoactive is illegal, except for an exemption list including things like alcohol, caffeine and theobromine.
Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org · 8 pts · 264d
Fucking experts hogging the good exotic shi
Libb@piefed.social · 5 pts · 264d
No need for mushrooms, one can easily (and legally, at least for the time being) open a book ;)
gilarelli@jlai.lu · 49 pts · 264d
Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 264d
Perfection
SailorFuzz@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 264d
you've never done shrooms to make the comparison and have an educated opinion on the matter. I've done both, and can perfectly see valid reason for either without moral grandstanding that one is a better alternative to the other.
TheRealKuni@piefed.social · 20 pts · 264d
What about morel grandstanding?
Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 264d
Hehehe
angrystego@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 264d
That was obviously supposed to be a joke, not an educated opinion. There's even an emoticon at the end ;)
Libb@piefed.social · 1 pts · 264d
Dude, that was merely a pun (sorry, not sure about the english word here: a wink at the printed version of those 'fairy tales' that have been legally shared through books for centuries). But whatever you say, have fun with your 'shrooms'.
gid@piefed.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 264d
SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world · 2 pts · 264d
Depends on which definition of "fairy" the book is about.
Libb@piefed.social · 1 pts · 264d
There is quite a lot of choice & variety.
To only mention a handful of public domain classics: Grimm's Fairy Tales are an obvious choice (think Sbnow White, Cincerella, Hansel & Gretel and so, so many more (quite hardcore to be honest), Lewis Caroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, Barry's Peter Pan or even things like Ovid's Metamorphosis (hard to beat, imho, even if many won't like it being categorized as a fairy tale and would prefer 'mythology'). Talking mythology, one coudl also consider reading some Norse mythology (the 'Edda', and sagas), and so on.
otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 264d
Step away from the drugs, citizen.
SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world · 2 pts · 264d
In the USA at least, the term "fairy" has long been used by some as derogatory slang for highly feminine-acting homosexual males (although I've seen the occasional use by such people themselves, which I assume is a bit like black people calling each other the "N-word" - I support both groups, but am a part of neither so I could be wrong in my interpretation on that aspect).
Considering virtually every group that aren't proud white "Christians" (a misnomer if ever there was one) are under extreme attack by the current US administration, I was implying a book about "fairies" might conceivably be about gay people and therefore "illegal" with all the book banning that has unfortunately been going on here.
Libb@piefed.social · 2 pts · 264d
Thx for the clarification, very much appreciated.
stray@pawb.social · 1 pts · 264d
I understand that you're kidding, but I bet books would be so much better with phantasia. Very much a "Why not both?" from me.