Be Pet, Gay Dogs

261 points · 30 comments · view on lemmy.world

30 Comments

starik@lemmy.zip · 25 pts · 247d (9 replies)

A reasonable request, either way you read it

SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world · 5 pts · 247d (8 replies)

Mkay... How does one fulfill the request to "gay dogs?"

lurch@sh.itjust.works · 13 pts · 247d (6 replies)

first step in "be pet gay dogs" is getting yourself a nice collar

SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world · 3 pts · 247d (5 replies)

Ah, that explains it - leather, I'm guessing?

Forester@pawb.social · 6 pts · 247d (4 replies)

The joke is pup play

SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world · 3 pts · 247d (3 replies)

Too old & out of the loop, I guess. Sorry.

Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 246d (2 replies)

I know some folks into pup play from my circles who range from 40 to 65+ hahaha. Mostly gay dudes, so if you’re not gay dude, I can see how that might not have crossed your path.

SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world · 2 pts · 246d

Nope. Straight as can be (but without all the insecurities about my manliness that make so many become assholes). Thanks for clearing that up - makes me feel slightly less clueless.

starik@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 246d

Gay is still an adjective in that one. It is requesting gay dogs to be pet.

cornshark@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 247d (2 replies)

Gay dogs deserve to be pet roo

cows_are_underrated@feddit.org · 15 pts · 247d

Roo?

SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world · 3 pts · 247d

It's what makes them gay.

SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world · 14 pts · 247d (5 replies)

I pet dogs frequently, do I now have to divorce my spouse due to irreconcilable differences of bodily parts?

Iheartcheese@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 247d (1 reply)

YOU HAVE THE GAY

SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world · 10 pts · 247d

Oh, shit! Get it off! GET IT OFF!!!

NO, I DIDN'T MEAN GET THAT OFF!!!

kokesh@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 247d (2 replies)

Serious case of gay

SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world · 2 pts · 247d (1 reply)

It's difficult to be serious when you're gay (happy).

Iheartcheese@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 246d

It's difficult to be serious when you're gay (pee pee in butt).

tetris11@feddit.uk · 7 pts · 247d

"Be Dogs, Pet Gay"

AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space · 3 pts · 246d

Perfectly normal fediverse user

qbus@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 247d (3 replies)

I think we need a , somewhere in here

SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world · 5 pts · 247d

It's right there in OP's title.

SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 247d (1 reply)

Actually I think the missing punctuation mark is a colon. Then it would say Be pet: gay dogs, which means that "gay dogs" is a clarification of which kind of pet we are being instructed to be.

I swear I'm fun at parties...

qbus@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 246d

Good doggo

Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 246d
[ removed ]
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 195d (3 replies)

Isn't this a !dontdeadopeninside@lemmy.ohaa.xyz?

cows_are_underrated@feddit.org · 1 pts · 195d (2 replies)

wheres the difference?

threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 195d (1 reply)

In a "NoSafetySmokingFirst", the text reads correctly left to right, but visual cues (like colouration, vertical proximity, or horizontal separation) lead you to try to read it top to bottom.

This is similar to, but distinct from, the more widely known "DontDeadOpenInside" format. In that case, the text reads correctly top to bottom, but visual cues (like colouration, horizontal proximity, or vertical separation) lead you to try to read it left to right.

cows_are_underrated@feddit.org · 2 pts · 195d

Oh, i never realized the difference.

Wutchilli@feddit.org · 2 pts · 247d

Both is good tho.