The reason given is perfect! đ
(For the record all I did was disagree with their bullshit. Meanwhile they were incredibly insulting and childish as fuck towards me)
Iâll add:
Theyâll never understand that while most everyone outside of their echo chamber thinks their politics may be ignorant and entirely misguided, people donât hate them for it. No, they are hated for their hypocrisy, their arrogance and their condescending narrative that while sharing the exact same sewage system- somehow their shit doesnât stink.
They are every bit as bad as MAGA, and in some cases⌠so much worse.
60 Comments
goat@sh.itjust.works · 18 pts · 237d
They are maga, dude. Most of them will allow Trump over Biden since they can't fathom the concept of the lesser of two evils.
Rhoeri@piefed.world · 5 pts · 237d
Exactly. I just say almost as bad because I allow for the fact that some are just dipshits that donât know better and are just parroting the shit that the cool kids say that sounds cool and worldly during lunch period.
einenNaziTotenEinenDeutschenErmorden@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 233d
einenNaziTotenEinenDeutschenErmorden@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 233d
KillYourSelfNow@sh.itjust.works · -5 pts · 237d
goat@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 237d
lol get owned
youPieceOfShit@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 236d
Rhoeri@piefed.world · 6 pts · 236d
lol⌠get owned.
GoatKillYourself@sh.itjust.works · -8 pts · 237d
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · 4 pts · 237d
Username checks out.
GoatKillYourself@sh.itjust.works · -12 pts · 237d
pebbles@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 237d
Username checks out.
Edit: oh I just checked this users history. This account exists to harass goat. Oof.
AzuranAurora@piefed.ca · 10 pts · 237d
Just Antiyanks, a sad little troll who's spent almost 2 years making accounts to harass people on this community and occasionally elsewhere. They really have nothing else better to do, having made well over a thousand accounts by now.
imSadTheUSKilledMyFriend@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 236d
youPieceOfShit@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 236d
Rhoeri@piefed.world · 5 pts · 236d
Imagine being so sad that you have to go through the effort to create an account just to troll a comm- only to end up justifying the purpose of said comm.
Man you have made some bad choices to end up⌠this.
GoatGenocider@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 236d
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 237d
The mods there like to ban people from unrelated communities, too, just to appease their petty egos.
Rhoeri@piefed.world · 10 pts · 237d
Oh yeah they will. And not just them!
Davel banned me from his little echo chambers for calling him out in a thread he came in to- all on his own, thst had nothing to do with him, and. that wasnât even in his instance.
Pure cowardice. Itâs hilarious and sad simultaneously.
goat@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 237d
You should post this to yepowertrippingbastards
Rhoeri@piefed.world · 11 pts · 237d
Banned from there for calling out that little troll Universal Monk and all of his sock puppets.
âBad jacketingâ apparently. So even when thereâs proof of a thing- you canât call it out. I guess weâre a little afraid of hurting feelings over there.
goat@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 237d
classic dbzer0
Rhoeri@piefed.world · 5 pts · 237d
Yup.
GoatKillYourself@sh.itjust.works · -6 pts · 237d
WearyWalker@piefed.world · 4 pts · 237d
!modabusereports@piefed.world
yptb is on dbzer0 which bans people for hurting admin feelings
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 236d
That community appears empty to me.
hatorade@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 234d
WearyWalker@piefed.world · -1 pts · 233d
no one's made a report yet... hard kind of comm to get started lol
GoatKillYourself@sh.itjust.works · -5 pts · 237d
youPieceOfShit@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 236d
Rhoeri@piefed.world · 3 pts · 236d
Yep. That sums him up pretty well Iâd say.
youPieceOfShit@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 236d
Rhoeri@piefed.world · 4 pts · 236d
Not at all, do you really not understand the concept that just because people say a thing, doesnât mean theyâre affected by said thing?
You see, Scooter- sometimes adults just share things because we think itâs funny, relevant, or in some cases, ironic. Itâs called communication. And unlike what Edgelord Internet 101 has taught you- simply bringing something up doesnât mean one has an emotional connection to it.
I really hope this helps you. You seem a bit lost.
(Postscript: if it is of any assistance to you, itâs spelled âfeelingsâ. Yeah. Thought Iâd point that out)
lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com · 9 pts · 237d
For the removed comment, I can't even see the modlog entry. How do they do that?
I noticed earlier they banned FiniteBanjo for nothing (modlog). Seems to me that @Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com is power-tripping.
Rhoeri@piefed.world · 7 pts · 237d
Theyâre cowards that donât want to have to own the fact that they remove shit that either doesnât break their rules, or breaks the exact same rules as the shit they wonât remove because it supports their bullshit agenda.
youPieceOfShit@sh.itjust.works · -2 pts · 236d
Rhoeri@piefed.world · 1 pts · 236d
Oooh! Thanks for the new post content!
astropenguin5@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 236d
Damn, I hang out in lefty memes sometimes and finitebanjo was one of the more decent people I've seen in there, unfortunate
Probably only a matter of time, and me actually caring to comment more for me to get banned too
WearyWalker@piefed.world · 3 pts · 237d
!modabusereports@piefed.world
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 8 pts · 237d
That mod drives me nuts, absolutely humorless.
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · -11 pts · 237d
Wow this community really went to shit. You definitely broke rule 3.
Rhoeri@piefed.world · 11 pts · 237d
Is that so? So read through the thread and tell me when I overstepped where anyone I was talking to didnât.
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · -9 pts · 237d
Uh... first I'd need a link to the thread?
GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 237d
So, how do you know they broke any rules, without having read anything first...?
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · -5 pts · 237d
-Them. If this is what they think, expressing their political views even somewhat honestly in the comm would run afoul of rule 3, which says
Now you can feel however you want about it, but the rule is clear, and the mods over there aren't especially trigger happy about removing liberals, so realistically OP would've had to do something pretty blatant to catch a ban.
MrSmith@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 236d
One of the mod is especially trigger-happy. They will blatantly blame Ukraine for the war, sport a russian flag in their bio and ban people for "being racist to russians".
It's 100% meanwhileongrad material.
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · 2 pts · 235d
I think I know which mod you're talking about, but while they do have more tankie sympathies than I'd like I haven't seen them do any of these things save for the Russian flag, which is next to the British and German flags to indicate the languages they speak.
MrSmith@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 235d
I understand what the flags mean. I'm saying it displays a bias.
They're very keen on "freezing the conflict" (beneficial only to russia), and any criticism towards russia is "russophobia".
Clearly a great moderator for "lefty memes" lol.
Rhoeri@piefed.world · 3 pts · 237d
So you donât know shit. Thanks for playing, now sit down.
PugJesus@piefed.social · 5 pts · 237d
What was the comment?
It seems to be in a thread about 'leftists' hating on Zohran Mamdani, one of the furthest left politicians in the USA.
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · 1 pts · 235d
I have no idea, but the fact that OP hasn't posted the comment here is more than enough evidence, not to mention how they absolutely sound like the kind of unapologetic liberal who would say unapologetically liberal shit and get banned for it.
PugJesus@piefed.social · 2 pts · 235d
That's... extremely dubious, especially considering that deleted comments are deleted for the user, not just hidden from others.
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · 2 pts · 235d
Still, they likely know the contents even if they can't repeat it verbatim. Either way I doubt the mods on c/leftymemes decided to single them out from all the people defending Mamdani in the comments.
PugJesus@piefed.social · 2 pts · 235d
There are numerous comments in the thread by the user which were all deleted (as the mods likely used the 'delete all comments' option which results in the deleted comments not showing in the modlog). Which one should they be summarizing?
... the mod active in that thread is an open apologist for Russian imperialism, and one of the other mods site-banned a user (me) for downvoting things I disagreed with from one of their pet posters.
What makes you think they're above petty or absurd bans?
NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io · 2 pts · 235d
Whichever comment they think likely contributed to the ban? As it stands we're basically being asked to take their word that their ban is unjustified, and they absolutely sound like the kind of person who'd rightly get banned under rule 3. Yeah not exactly a case I'd argue in court, but in the absence of better evidence I'm far more inclined to believe the ban is justified than otherwise.
Maybe they're not, but if this was a petty or absurd ban I'd expect to see more petty or absurd bans in the same thread given the large number of pro-Mamdani comments.
PugJesus@piefed.social · 1 pts · 235d
By their account, they were banned for disagreeing with the core argument being made ("For the record all I did was disagree with their bullshit.")
The entire point of a petty ban is that someone is banned because they irritated the mod or one of the mod's pets, not for violating a consistently-applied rule. Sometimes it's by pushing back too hard against the mod, other times by hitting a soft spot or using an argument the mod doesn't like.
Considering the remaining pro-Mamdani comments are pretty 'gentle' in their defense of Mamdani, I would be unsurprised if the ban was legitimately petty.
For that matter, calling support of Mamdani 'liberalism' (which any disagreement with the meme would necessarily include) is... questionable.
And how predictable, my most dedicated stalker, Eugene V. Debs Ghost, came to see me.
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 237d
Did you see the comment in question? What did it say?
monkeyjoe@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 212d
No no, breaking the rules is good when they do it. Only them. Anyone else is bad and evil and Tankie.
goat@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 212d
Hey antiyanks, if you stick to this account I'll let ya stay
hatorade@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 234d
No you see, He's allowed to be an asshole and break rules, and the mods who stop him are actually evil tankies for wanting civil people.
PugJesus@piefed.social · 3 pts · 234d
Oh, Eugene V Debs Ghost, you mean like this statement from you to Rhoeri in that thread?
I see the mods really are cracking down on folk who aren't civil.
Ironic, considering you made the Hatorade account specifically so you could still follow me around. Projection, just like the conservatives you ape.
goat@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 234d
Do you have any evidence that hatorade is eugene?
Rhoeri@piefed.world · -1 pts · 233d
And yet here you are. Being an asshole and breaking the rules here
I guess the mods here are sad little cowards that get easily triggered by people that disagree with the propaganda machine.
I had no idea you were so triggered by my post that youâre still complaining about it.
Go outside dude. Seriously. You need fresh air.