Even better: one reviewer thought it's not up to them to decide whether the images are okay. And another reviewer raised concerns, was ignored by the authors of the paper and then it was published anyways.
But I have to admit that it's kind of ironic that your comment shows you didn't read the article :D
I did skim it fast but . All I saw was it mentioned multiple people and where they were from.
The reviewer who approved it at frontier did not stop it for the AI or revision requests.
I just re read it and I guess there are 2 sentences that clarify this point better.
Hopefully not just retracting that one study but changing their processes to make sure it doesn’t keep happening. Going to be harder to see and detect moving forward.
19 Comments
diemartin@sh.itjust.works · 87 pts · 240d
Reminds me of this
watson387@sopuli.xyz · 44 pts · 239d
bluesheep@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 239d
Damn it spelled cell right
Okay yeah that figures
tkk13909@sopuli.xyz · 11 pts · 239d
Ah fuck I've been hit in the testtomcels!
myslsl@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 239d
It's really sad how they dissilced his dck like that.
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 238d
“Ow, my squeedily-spooch!”
Paradachshund@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 239d
Test 'em? I hardly knew 'em!
JasonDJ@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 238d
Hey you like cells?
How do you like two testtomcels???
borf@lemmynsfw.com · 34 pts · 240d
[Feb 2024]
realitista@lemmus.org · 16 pts · 240d
I was surprised it took them 2 years to figure it out!
daannii@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 239d
Yeah they should ban the people who were supposed to review it, from being allowed to review any future papers.
They likely were using AI or didn't even read the paper.
Frontier should have higher standards.
ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org · 34 pts · 239d
Even better: one reviewer thought it's not up to them to decide whether the images are okay. And another reviewer raised concerns, was ignored by the authors of the paper and then it was published anyways.
But I have to admit that it's kind of ironic that your comment shows you didn't read the article :D
daannii@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 239d
I did skim it fast but . All I saw was it mentioned multiple people and where they were from.
The reviewer who approved it at frontier did not stop it for the AI or revision requests.
I just re read it and I guess there are 2 sentences that clarify this point better.
ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org · 7 pts · 239d
Don't worry, you're not a peer reviewer. It was just a funny coincidence
otter@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 240d
Generative AI "anatomy" diagrams gross me out almost every time. It has a similar effect as those old trypophobia images
s@piefed.world · 8 pts · 240d
Who will the Woke strike next?
human@slrpnk.net · 7 pts · 240d
Great album
moistclump@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 239d
Hopefully not just retracting that one study but changing their processes to make sure it doesn’t keep happening. Going to be harder to see and detect moving forward.
AreaKode@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 239d
If their dongs were proportional to their nuts, that wouldn't be far off!