"Anarchist" tries to argue in favor of Trump invading Iran

95 points · 8 comments · view on lemmy.world

8 Comments

slothrop@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 242d (1 reply)

Another 'anarchist' who has no idea what it means.
I'm certain their definitions of 'socialist', 'communist', 'libertarian', and 'leftist' are just as comical.

starlinguk@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 242d

And "liberal".

starlinguk@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 242d

Trump can't really invade Iran without admitting the demonstrations in the US have a point. Although I can see MAGAts coming up with far fetched explanations of why this is different.

balsoft@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 242d

Ah yes, anarchism. Arguing for replacing a partially democratic theocracy with a batshit insane fascist monarchy, for the purpose of letting the US privatize the oil fields. This is some Dali levels of insanity (but with none of the talent)

l_isqof@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 242d (1 reply)

Is that what Russian bots call themselves now?

Botzo@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 242d

Not exactly much cover with the username "perestroika".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perestroika

kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 242d (2 replies)

As an actural Anarchist what the hell is this person saying?

Quite frankly I think theres at least a non insignificant chance that the protest was started/funded/pushed partially/entirely by the zionists/US-imperialists or was at the absolute bare minimum cooped by said zionists/us-imperialists. Theres a chance this is 100% organic but seeing how common Zionist flags are at these "Iranian" protests I get the feeling its less than 100%.

Syun@retrolemmy.com · 4 pts · 241d (1 reply)
[ removed ]
kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 241d

Sure but right now their movement seems to be spontaneous and lacking real leadership, seems perfect to be hijacked by imperialists