hell no!

460 points · 18 comments · view on lemmy.world

18 Comments

MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca · 35 pts · 224d

"Trying to move an image one pixel down in Word"

rtxn@lemmy.world · 25 pts · 224d (1 reply)

"It's just one goto, what's the worst that could happen?"

SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de · 8 pts · 224d

Raptors

jjjalljs@ttrpg.network · 25 pts · 224d (5 replies)

There's a lot of fear at my job about changing code. I've been trying to tell them to start writing automated tests. Or at least a linter to check for syntax errors. They're all like "ooh that sounds hard maybe next quarter"

Meanwhile, a trivial change requires a whole day because the developer has to manually test everything.

I just unilaterally added checks to code I have ownership over, but anything shared I'm getting "maybe in two quarters we can prioritize this" from management.

squaresinger@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 224d (1 reply)

At my job:

We do have a linter and tons of automatic tests. Changes are generally quite safe, not a lot of manual tests are necessary.

Meanwhile, a trivial change requires a whole day because the developer has to adjust dozens of tests and get them through a pipeline that takes hours to run.

jjjalljs@ttrpg.network · 5 pts · 223d

Oof. I've had places that the pipeline was getting long. At one of my previous jobs I made it so all the tests could run locally, and we were keeping the full build as slow as possible.

We also didn't do any browser tests (eg: selenium) because those tend to be slow and most people are bad at making them stable.

It's important to know whats worth testing.

emergencybird@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 224d

I haven't been in the field for too long but my very first job had extensive ci/cd pipelines setup. At first I was kind of annoyed by having to write tests and having my code auto refused by lint checks. Now that I experienced a job that didn't have any automated testing, I realized how much I love TDD. Nearly all my personal projects have ci with at the very least lint checks.

F04118F@feddit.nl · 2 pts · 224d (1 reply)

Start interviewing

jjjalljs@ttrpg.network · 1 pts · 223d

That's the plan. Unfortunately the market is kind of meh. Lots of AI slop. Lots of getting ghosted.

bleistift2@sopuli.xyz · 20 pts · 224d

Reminds me of the time my whole website started spinning because I forgot to close a tag.

fckreddit@lemmy.ml · 17 pts · 224d (1 reply)

Damnit Escher. Not in my code too.

NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org · 17 pts · 224d

entwine@programming.dev · 9 pts · 224d
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 224d

I commented out a line in the game I'm building and the enemy could suddenly control my character. Cool cool cool cool cool

Speiser0@feddit.org · 7 pts · 224d

If AIs were able to handle this safely, I'd consider using them.

snek_boi@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 224d

This totally happens in code where functions have plenty of side effects. And thats why functional programming can lead to fearless refactoring!

stupidcasey@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 223d

Dang it i changed

import(math)

To

import(MC.Escher)

Again

sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 223d

"OP discovers quaternions."

How do you solve gimbal lock?

3Vector Math / Matrix Algebra?

Nonsense rotational transforms?

You do nonsense harder.

Imaginary 4th Dimension, harder.

Shut up, don't think about it, yes it will work if you don't think about it.

... I guess that makes it like, the opposite of Orc Wauuugh or whatever?