Alt text: Screenshot of AI Facilitator's summary of a meeting from chat: With about 10 minutes left, please focus on these key items to make the most of our remaining time: Clarify any outstanding action items or decisions that need to be finalized before we end. Confirm next steps or follow-up responsibilities for participants. Summary of discussion so far The conversation has covered a wide range of topics, with some references to technical issues, project updates, and logistical matters. Several points remain unclear or unresolved, and there is a need to consolidate agreements and ensure everyone is aligned.

32 Comments
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world · 78 pts · 210d
Let's leverage the key learnings into win-win scenarios by applying state of the art technologies to create shareholder value!
truthfultemporarily@feddit.org · 24 pts · 210d
But have you involved all relevant stakeholders?
AstralPath@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 210d
Might need to circle back on that one.
LordMayor@piefed.social · 11 pts · 210d
Needs more synergies.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 210d
Let’s parking lot that.
mech@feddit.org · 6 pts · 210d
Do donuts?
a_postmodern_hat@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 210d
Thanks all.
spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 210d
I just wanted flag this for you
RollingZeppelin@piefed.ca · 7 pts · 209d
Don't forget to ideate solutions so we can down select for optimal performance.
Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 209d
Are we no longer doing synergy?
sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world · 68 pts · 210d
So helpful. Gemini once summarized a VM from my kid (who is autistic and doesn't speak super well) as a "long, rambling and incoherent message" with no attempt to decipher what was said. We will not be replaced by AI anytime soon.
Cris_Color@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 210d
What a novel way for google to accomplish something kinda fucked up. The applications of ai truly know no bounds
FelixCress@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 210d
Now I am genuinely curious how would AI summarise Trump speaches 😂
snooggums@piefed.world · 10 pts · 210d
If AI was reliably accurate it would be [incoherent dementia ranting]
JetpackJackson@feddit.org · 14 pts · 210d
Wtf that's messed up. I'm sorry that happened to yall. That's very dehumanizing
sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 210d
Thanks! It was pretty funny - even at the time. Although, yeah, pretty dehumanizing.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 210d
I mean, it’s AI. It doesn’t even know what it is.
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 210d
A virtual machine? Is it still fun to dereference jargon the first time it's mentioned?
YerbaYerba@lemmy.zip · 10 pts · 210d
Voice mail?
pishadoot@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 209d
I think it's verbal meltdown?
MotoAsh@piefed.social · 4 pts · 210d
lol Yes we will. Many have already been replaced.
People NEED to realize how stupid and greedy capitalists are...
It doesn't have to be even comparable to the employee's actual output to replace them. It just has to make executives think it can, and since when did executives ever actually understand what they're employees do or how hard it is?
They're so deep in the ELIZA effect that they thoroughly believe this kind of problem is as easy as adding a couple instructions to fix.
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 25 pts · 210d
It’s just a data grab on open ai’s part
agavaa@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 210d
Oh, absolutely. Some coworkers don't understand it though.
laranis@lemmy.zip · 20 pts · 210d
How long until the meeting content is condensed into a score that is used on performance reviews?
"Well, Bob, you're a diligent worker and your output is on par with your peers, but your Teams Meeting Quality Quotient is sub par. Among other things the Facilitator(TM) has noted a tendency to not use the entire allotted meeting time, and that the actions it automatically identified aren't being marked complete on the Teams AI Task Board. That looks really bad. It also says your meetings have 12% higher off topic content than your peers citing an increase to 15% correlating with March Madness. Though it is notable that the 60/40 split of male/female voices speaking is above the company mandate of 70/30, so that's good."
fascicle@leminal.space · 20 pts · 210d
Now your meetings that should have been and email are sent as an email
cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de · 15 pts · 210d
Wow, how helpful! Let's spend another trillion on this super-intelligence!
ilinamorato@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 210d
Wow. I could code up that "AI" in an afternoon, and I wouldn't even need an LLM for it.
melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 210d
Same shit goes on in these meetings forever but now you have to pay a monthly subscription for colour commentary. Only in america.
halfapage@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 210d
Pringles@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 210d
Facilitator is actually a pretty decent feature. It works pretty well for recurring meetings with a set agenda. The message shown is not very useful, but the automatic notes and summary are usually fairly good.
HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 210d
But that's not something you need an LLM for...
mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 209d
Still more helpful than my PM
angeld@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 210d
Sumarize? A inexistent meet is better than a non necesary meet.