Scientists have confirmed that a 26ft tall, tree-trunk-shaped organism, first discovered in Scotland in 1843, isn't a fungus or plant, but an entirely distinct evolutionary branch of life

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/01/21/new-form-of-life-discovered-and-its-26ft-tall/

183 points · 22 comments · view on lemmy.world

22 Comments

someguy3@lemmy.world · 59 pts · 203d (9 replies)

But new research from the University of Edinburgh and National Museums Scotland has shown the fossil is neither fungus nor plant, but a new lifeform that became extinct around 370 million years ago.

Sandy Hetherington, the lead co-author and research associate at National Museums Scotland, said: “They are life, but not as we now know it, displaying anatomical and chemical characteristics distinct from fungal or plant life, and therefore belonging to an entirely extinct evolutionary branch of life.”

Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone · 22 pts · 202d (2 replies)

It’s life Jim, but not as we know it

fartographer@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 202d (1 reply)

There's Klingons on the starboard bow

TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id · 3 pts · 202d

Starboard bow, Jim!

victorz@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 202d (2 replies)

an entirely extinct evolutionary branch of life

Pardon my ignorance, I seem to have misunderstood the meaning of "extinct" (?).

someguy3@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 202d (1 reply)

It's a fossil. Really should be part of the headline.

victorz@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 202d

Oooh, okay yeah.

Man, what I wouldn't give to time travel back millions of years and just have a glance through the window of a pod, to see what it would be like to live here for a day back then.

molestme247@lemmy.world · -9 pts · 203d (2 replies)

'They are life' wtf? LoL

wewbull@feddit.uk · 14 pts · 202d (1 reply)

...because it's multiple lifeforms making a single structure. The plural is correct.

whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 202d

Sounds kinda like coral

cryptTurtle@piefed.social · 42 pts · 202d (4 replies)

Wiki has a breakdown of the debate and how it's evolved: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototaxites

Neat stuff

calliope@retrolemmy.com · 13 pts · 202d (2 replies)

This has absolutely blown my mind!

This looks exactly like the kind of whose ancestors would, over millions of years, eventually mutate to become a tree.

The polished fossil in the Wikipedia article looks a shocking amount like wood!

Naz@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 202d

Dude; I think you're absolutely correct.

It looks like a proto-tree

Also: Trees aren't a uniform genus, but this goes to show, on any planet that has photosynthesis, trees will eventually evolve spontaneously

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 202d

there were "trees" before actual trees evolved. in the carbiniferous, mostly from lycophytes,

Phoenix3875@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 202d

One of the linked papers thinks it's actually horizontal rather vertical, as people have guessed originally.

ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 203d (1 reply)

Spooky phallus.

Triumph@fedia.io · 3 pts · 202d

That doesn't narrow it down.

Laukidh@infosec.exchange · 9 pts · 203d

@Innerworld “Sandy Hetherington, the lead co-author and research associate at National Museums Scotland, said: “They are life, but not as we now know it”

https://youtu.be/FCARADb9asE

lvxferre@mander.xyz · 9 pts · 202d (2 replies)
[ removed ]
doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 202d (1 reply)

However since it doesn’t do photosynthesis we can rule out belonging to those clades,

There are plants and algae that don't do photosynthesis (although I think they still have vestigial chloroplast?)

lvxferre@mander.xyz · 3 pts · 202d
[ removed ]
Zacryon@feddit.org · 8 pts · 202d (1 reply)

About 7,9248 m (decimal comma)

DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social · 5 pts · 202d

Decimal commas are a lie to cover up that they found Yggdrasil

Maeve@kbin.earth · 4 pts · 202d