Meh. Negative results are still results, and there's still plenty of well researched sci-fitheory that needs to be tested. I could see the field of experimental particle physics shrink or pause until technology catches up to the experiments they want to run, but I can't see it disappearing forever
I've been saying for a long time this is a sham magazine, and here we are with a sour-toned anti-research push piece for AI. I've had it with this publication.
I feel packaged libraries make it easy to get the effect, but normal devs no longer know how the underlying models work anymore, and so ganes are starting to look generic.
6 Comments
Gust@piefed.social · 6 pts · 205d
Meh. Negative results are still results, and there's still plenty of
well researched sci-fitheory that needs to be tested. I could see the field of experimental particle physics shrink or pause until technology catches up to the experiments they want to run, but I can't see it disappearing foreverMetalSlugX@piefed.social · 2 pts · 205d
I've been saying for a long time this is a sham magazine, and here we are with a sour-toned anti-research push piece for AI. I've had it with this publication.
aburrito@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 205d
Call me particle physics the way I’m dead dying AND hard
JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 205d
I feel packaged libraries make it easy to get the effect, but normal devs no longer know how the underlying models work anymore, and so ganes are starting to look generic.
kybean@pawb.social · 9 pts · 205d
Wrong kind of particle physics, this is about the physics of subatomic particles, not video game particle engines
JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 205d
Upvoted. And thanks for the correction