Cannon, who in 2024 dismissed the case after concluding that Smith was unlawfully appointed, said the release of the report would present a “manifest injustice” to Trump and his two co-defendants.
Corruption at its core. No conflicts of interest to see here.
Has anyone made a site where it’s two pictures and you have to guess which picture is a Trump appointee, or maybe which one is super right wing? ‘Cause like… —and no, I’m not talking about phrenology or whatever racist science rabbit hole I might be going parallel to— it just feels like the worst ones have the deadest eyes or the most vain of portraits.
I know this isn’t a good example in the headline, but I’ve never seen her before and I could just tell I wouldn’t like her.
A disproportionate number of them are likely true psychopaths, without functional empathy or conscience. That is certainly my theory about the dead eyes.
ffs lady his pp is too short to pleasure your musty cobwebbed troll hole, you can stop worshipping his ken doll coin purse with BBs that never descended now
29 Comments
digitalFatteh@lemmy.ca · 135 pts · 171d
Corruption at its core. No conflicts of interest to see here.
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 40 pts · 171d
"Manifest Injustice" sounds like a spell all the Republican magic users cast after every long rest.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 171d
After a very long SUCCULENT CHINESE MEAL
santa@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 171d
Can this move be appealed?
Asafum@lemmy.world · 102 pts · 171d
I am so sick of seeing her fucking name... She's not a judge she's been Trump's personal defense lawyer the entire time...
GraniteM@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 171d
Just wait until he puts her on the Supreme Court after Alito retires.
cowfodder@lemmy.world · 71 pts · 171d
Do it anyway. Consequences for violating court orders don't exist anymore.
ceenote@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 171d
Only if you got the (R)
Hapankaali@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 171d
Hot favourite for the next SCOTUS seat for sure, though perhaps Thomas would be disappointed in losing the crown of the most corrupt SCOTUS judge.
2hundredpancakes@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 18 pts · 171d
No soul behind those eyes. Jfc
criss_cross@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 171d
I look forward to when Cannon is shot out of a Cannon.
doug@lemmy.today · 14 pts · 171d
Has anyone made a site where it’s two pictures and you have to guess which picture is a Trump appointee, or maybe which one is super right wing? ‘Cause like… —and no, I’m not talking about phrenology or whatever racist science rabbit hole I might be going parallel to— it just feels like the worst ones have the deadest eyes or the most vain of portraits.
I know this isn’t a good example in the headline, but I’ve never seen her before and I could just tell I wouldn’t like her.
NekoKoneko@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 171d
A disproportionate number of them are likely true psychopaths, without functional empathy or conscience. That is certainly my theory about the dead eyes.
ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 171d
It's the eyes. She's got the crazy Kenneth Copeland eyes. Amy Coney Barrett does too.
Redacted@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 171d
Theres a 'dle game where you are given the picture of a us politician and you guess if theyre blue or red
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 171d
iT’s BiDeNz FauLt!1!!
Jenosideeeeezzzzz!!
heil putin
WanderWisley@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 171d
I would like to congratulate Aileen Cannon for her future career as a member of the Supreme Court. 🫲🍊🫱
justsomeguy@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 171d
She's a loose cannon but a horrible officer of the law.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 171d
You’re off YOUR case, Chief!
santa@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 171d
I see what u did there
devolution@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 171d
I'm sure she has his swimmers stuck between her teeth.
SpankyDoodle@eviltoast.org · 6 pts · 171d
At this point, fuck em. Just release it.
dwalin@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 171d
Someone should just leak an ip on the dark web and say that there is a weak password. And let nature run its course
JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 171d
Is there more than ONE picture of this monster trump appointee?
Sunflier@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 170d
It's probably her official portrait that is in the public record. Other stuff could risk invasion of privacy claims or some sort of IP stuff.
decapitae@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 171d
There is no justice in the regimes just-us department.
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 171d
Wasn’t the government’s position basically “well you didn’t give Trump the documents he stole!”?
ceenote@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 171d
In the future I hope for, the only reason the judicial reform bill wouldn't have her name on it is because Clarence Thomas exists.
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 171d
ffs lady his pp is too short to pleasure your musty cobwebbed troll hole, you can stop worshipping his ken doll coin purse with BBs that never descended now