In 2023, Springer retracted a paper co-authored by Bailey [28] on the rapid onset gender dysphoria (ROGD) hypothesis "due to concerns about lack of informed consent", which had been published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior.
Check out AdNauseum, it's like ublock origin except it "clicks" on every ad you come across. It uses a little bit more of your bandwidth and ram but I think it's totally worth it
I know that addon, but decided against.
Prime argument against it is that a major reason I use ublock is security.
Ad links lead sometimes to trojan distributing sites, and I really don't want to catch a drive-by virus...
What is Drive By Download?
A drive-by download is a cyber-attack that unintentionally downloads malicious code onto a computer or mobile device that exposes the users to different threats [....]
The user doesn't have to click on anything, press download, or open a malicious email attachment to become infected. These types of attacks can take advantage of an app, operating system, or web browser that contains security flaws due to a lack of updates or unsuccessful updates.
So, the question is: Do I trust an Addon to be bug-free enough to let it intentionally run loose on high-risk content?
And is it worth the potential additional risk (that I try to minimize in the first place by using Ad- and Script-Blockers)?
Besides that there seem to be other reasons not to use AdNauseam, a major one being that it generates profit for e.g. google.
Well, happened to me once already.
Auto-pop-up to a hijacked page.
Anti-Virus found the trojan later after next update.
About 15 years ago and I was running Windows, but still...
I'm not sure if it's the exact same system nowadays, but advertisers are usually billed in two different metrics: CPM (cost per mille (one thousand views)), and CPC (cost per click). The unit price for CPC is usually higher than CPM.
If they're being scientific wouldn't contributing your data make their results say what they don't went them to though, even if their intent is transphobic? I'm not on Reddit though so I haven't seen these anyway
Only if you expect them to actually be scientific, to not misrepresent the data willy-nilly, to not simply drop undesired data and never mention it, to not use manipulative language to make a statistically relevant amount of people answer in a way they want, ecetera.
41 Comments
mst@discuss.tchncs.de · 136 pts · 171d
Don't click on any add.
CluckN@lemmy.world · 38 pts · 171d
What if it’s a hot single in my area?
P1k1e@lemmy.world · 32 pts · 171d
Oh, well in that case
Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 171d
Only if there 900°
DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 170d
That's pretty hot
KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 170d
Celsius or Fahrenheit?
festnt@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 170d
where 900 degrees?!?
Spezi@feddit.org · 12 pts · 170d
I only click on subtract.
GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 171d
Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone · 134 pts · 171d
Why have they been fingering a smurf tho 😭
Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 34 pts · 171d
Like a weird version of the avatar from ATLA
GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 16 pts · 171d
Gender bending..?
GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 171d
bstix@feddit.dk · 1 pts · 170d
Just smurf them in the smurf. Smurfette lets you do that when you're a smurf.
renzhexiangjiao@piefed.blahaj.zone · 88 pts · 171d
better: get off reddit
birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 38 pts · 171d
Already was, saw this one crossposted elsewhere
urheber@discuss.tchncs.de · 13 pts · 171d
I want to, but where do I get cat pics? (I'm serious)
ink1ing@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 171d
Domi@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 170d
Beautiful!
Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 25 pts · 171d
https://lemmy.world/c/cat
Pretty active
Sergio@piefed.social · 23 pts · 171d
urheber@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 170d
It's not enough, Im on cat Internet 5 hours a day
Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone · 13 pts · 171d
!manul@lemmy.blahaj.zone
nimpnin@sopuli.xyz · 44 pts · 171d
More info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Michael_Bailey#Research_and_views
Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de · 27 pts · 171d
Won't they be charged extra when you click on it?
whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 171d
yeah, I would click and forget for them to pay
coolman@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 171d
Check out AdNauseum, it's like ublock origin except it "clicks" on every ad you come across. It uses a little bit more of your bandwidth and ram but I think it's totally worth it
Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de · 6 pts · 171d
I know that addon, but decided against.
Prime argument against it is that a major reason I use ublock is security.
Ad links lead sometimes to trojan distributing sites, and I really don't want to catch a drive-by virus...
isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 170d
That's not how AdNauseam works. It sends a network request, but ignores the response. This basically "pokes" the ad server, triggering a payout.
FWIW, AdNauseam is based on uBlock Origin.
glibg10b@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 170d
That's not how viruses work. Your PC can't just "catch a virus" if you click the wrong link
If you really think that's how that works, then using the internet must be a terrifying experience for you. I feel bad for you
Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de · 0 pts · 170d
So, the question is: Do I trust an Addon to be bug-free enough to let it intentionally run loose on high-risk content?
And is it worth the potential additional risk (that I try to minimize in the first place by using Ad- and Script-Blockers)?
Besides that there seem to be other reasons not to use AdNauseam, a major one being that it generates profit for e.g. google.
glibg10b@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 170d
No one's wasting a zero-day browser vulnerability on you
Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de · 0 pts · 170d
Well, happened to me once already.
Auto-pop-up to a hijacked page.
Anti-Virus found the trojan later after next update.
About 15 years ago and I was running Windows, but still...
glibg10b@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 170d
Things have changed a lot in 15 years...
garbagebagel@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 171d
Wait, what? Have I been wrong about how ads work this whole time?
Saledovil@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 171d
Each time you load the page, there's an auction to sell ad spots. The advertiser has to pay their bid once you click on the add.
wholookshere@piefed.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 171d
A lot of ads also run on conversion. Some and networks don't charge right away until a user converts.
kungen@feddit.nu · 1 pts · 171d
I'm not sure if it's the exact same system nowadays, but advertisers are usually billed in two different metrics: CPM (cost per mille (one thousand views)), and CPC (cost per click). The unit price for CPC is usually higher than CPM.
verdare@piefed.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 171d
Click on it and submit false data, got it.
Draconic_NEO@pawb.social · 13 pts · 171d
They're probably already doing that with a load of their own sockpuppets.
TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 171d
If they're being scientific wouldn't contributing your data make their results say what they don't went them to though, even if their intent is transphobic? I'm not on Reddit though so I haven't seen these anyway
Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de · 40 pts · 171d
Only if you expect them to actually be scientific, to not misrepresent the data willy-nilly, to not simply drop undesired data and never mention it, to not use manipulative language to make a statistically relevant amount of people answer in a way they want, ecetera.
It's better to not give them shit at all.
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 170d
Click on it, then post Never Gonna Give You Up as your story!
Ruin these fuckers data collection!