Do you think congress may have forgotten how their job works? Like I remember learning the importance of congress in middle school. Power of purse and all that. Why is the congress petitioning the president for legislation? Can we please replace the congressmen who don't understand what their job description is? Every day in the news its just "Legislator asking someone else to do their job" "Legislature confused on how laws are made" "legislator claiming the presidents office is just better at making laws"
55 Comments
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 58 pts · 173d
The most interesting part of this is the timing. 11 months since the trump admin did the largest pump and dump in human history during the great tariff terror of 2025. I was there watching markets drop 5-7% a day for a week. I was there when my accounts got major margin calls at the low. I was there when trump tweeted on truth social and the markets rose 20% in one day and almost 100% over the next 6 months.
So I know a $200 Billion capital gains tax relief package when I see it! More tax cuts for the rich. Congress has no hopes of passing it so they are hoping the president can wave his magic wand and cough up $200B
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 50 pts · 173d
It wasn't enough that they stole all your money and manipulated markets, they need a tax break on all the money they stole!
WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 173d
200 billion is peanuts to the tens of trillions the neoliberal-conservative cancer has been stealing from the working class for the last 50 years. They won't stop until they rule all life on Earth, or kill all life on Earth.
Late stage capitalism is fascism, and the fact that Luigi was an anomaly — even after our governments and intelligence agencies are proven to be run by criminally corrupt pedophiles — proves how mentally ill our entire civilization truly is. We are little more than talking apes, and we prove it every single day.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 172d
I think they’re probably going to throw us in the wood chipper soon
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 172d
But 200 billion is a lot of money for a single handout aimed at .01% of the population 😅
liuther9@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 170d
I blame those who protect them. Police, military etc
betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 173d
Source
The operator of the archive service you're using has edited archived content and used its CAPTCHA page to DDoS a blog.
chaogomu@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 172d
Also important to note that the operator of that site has been editing archived pages, so who the fuck knows if anything still matches the original.
But yes, the malicious hijacking of people's browser to launch a DDoS attack is worse.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 172d
Sorry! Happy to correct. Can someone lend me a clean url?
mistermodal@lemmy.ml · -2 pts · 172d
God forbid men do anything
betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 172d
What?
mistermodal@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 172d
God forbid men do anything
betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 172d
Got it, thanks.
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 173d
I think we maybe need to force these idiots watch School House Rock again.
Maybe their voters, too.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 172d
RIGHT! I forgot about that. We learned this shit when we were toddlers. 😭 this is preschool level political science they are failing. Clearly a sign of dementia.
hark@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 172d
Ah, so the ultra-wealthy who have been holding during the longest bull market in history can get a massive discount for dumping on us peons?
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 172d
Yes, and remember only about 40% of the country had stocks, and most of them are in the hands of 10%. So grandma might get a lil tax break and bezos gets a big one.
They are kind of stuck in a paradox though because they are causing so much fucking inflation that the stock market is really the only place to keep money. Idk where they’re going to stick cash from selling stocks. Could be a market crash on the horizon a planned one.
I really don’t think these guys want off the inflated asset train so I’m kinda more suspicious on this particular handout
Bakkoda@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 171d
Legislated bag holding for all your retirement needs
liuther9@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 170d
But that is the purpose of investment. To not lose money to inflation. He wants to make extra gains out of his ass
paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 18 pts · 171d
I always wonder whether people who talk like this are employing ineffective rhetoric or if they genuinely believe Ted Cruz just doesn't know Congress holds the power of the purse. He understands what his job description is. They all do. You're the one playing the wrong game. They want authoritarianism, they want to concentrate power, they want to destroy democracy, they want you to suffer, they want people to die. This isn't hyperbole, they're just evil. Stop whitewashing what they believe and call them out for the demons they are. Ted Cruz wants the President to have unchecked power. He wants Trump to cut hundreds of billions of dollars from taxes without Congress. He wants it to be easier to do bad things and harder to do good things. We cannot afford to be this fucking smug about the people putting us in camps.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 171d
I'd argue calling them demons is employing rhetoric that is ineffective. It kinda shuts off the rational part of the listeners brain. I prefer to gentle steer towards acknowledging the straying away from normals. Which conservatism is still about preserving normals. I know what you're saying is not hyperbole and I agree with you but probably not the best way to reach hearts and minds? I like to kinda sneak in unnoticed and then start manipulating peoples emotions subtly, but the whole yelling about demons thing is appealing to. It's okay to have different approaches, we all want to see congress hung for their crimes <3
devolution@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 172d
Ancient Rome before the fall of the Republic is eerily similar. Only difference is, we don't have Caesar and Pompey. We instead have a chuckle Fuck who rapes children and is the single dumbest person alive.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 172d
We do love recreating classic movies
ugandan_airways@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 172d
Ted “my dad isn’t the zodiac” Cruz
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip · 13 pts · 172d
pigup@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 172d
🤨
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 171d
Thank you for this.
tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 171d
Oliver had more poems too
https://youtu.be/bV42PgyOFE0
BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 171d
If the sale results in less than $250k in profit it's already tax free. It goes up to $500k for joint filers. This doesn't help the average person, just like eliminating the inheritance tax wouldn't help us either.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 171d
Yea that's a tax break that does help the "middle class" even tho home ownership is being denied to more and more of them. They need to raise the standard deduction to the median wage and make the rich people shoulder the tax burden created. I'd bet they'd be more frugal if they weren't finding new ways to tax the poor to cover the spending.
PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 171d
Someone should just give dude the biggest wedgie possible. Fucking loser.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 171d
Please Texas for the love of god get rid of this man! There's gotta be another unqualified jerk off they can agree on right?
kreskin@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 172d
What does congress even do anymore?
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 172d
Collect free health care and a big paycheck that most Americans will never see. Sometimes they deregulate companies and invest in there stocks creating massive wealth. They manufacture consent for war, eat hot chip and lie basically
phutatorius@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 171d
Cruz knows. He's just sucking up to Trump and doing all he can to further enable dictatorship.
humanspiral@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 171d
is a ridiculous idea, but one that should be shot down in congress.
Far more revenue would be generated for society if there was no capital gains tax advantage at all instead of giving another huge advantage to investor class. This is a better idea than wealth taxes. To avoid the double taxation argument, allowing corporations to deduct dividend payments would still raise extreme revenue, with dividend income taxed the same as other income. It would also improve dynamic capital allocation as more funds flowing to investor class would permit them to support newer, more promising, investments.
Corporatist supremacy oppresses the investor class. This tax change would mean less dividends paid because it would be an even greater tax advantage to boost corporate share prices instead of ever paying back investors
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 171d
That is a good idea. Probably too nuanced for a main stream campaign but something a senate committee could at least work on. The incentives to form monopolies and perform buybacks has really stopped a lot of progress and entrenched the wealth inequality. CEO's paid in stock options to avoid taxes, there's a lot of ways you can hammer the money out without Main Street noticing.
humanspiral@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 171d
Seems improbable if one side is considering how to reduce taxes for their donors, and other side is looking at fair taxation policies. I'm not sure that such committees can be formed if minority is pessimistic on agenda for it.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 171d
highly improbable but still a good idea.
maplesaga@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 171d
Do American care about another few hundred billion in debt? The interest on past debt is a trillion dollars, Biden proposed a 4T Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which the interest on that would be more than 200b.
Every politician takes on more debt than the last, so I assumed Americans don't care about debt loads.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 171d
Spending 1.2 Trillion fixing roads, airports and ports? Thats like literally the purpose of forming a government. Im not sure where you got the 4T from. That was the tax deficit spending included in the BBB 2025.
Yes we spend 900 billion a year on interest so where are we coming up with 200B for hand outs?
Yes the people keep voting morons into congress and have set up perverse incentives for them to rob us. Yes it still makes me upset every time.
So yes some of us Americans do care about the congress being able to pass a sensible budget. The debt won't stop growing if they don't stop giving everyone handouts. I deeply care that the next 3 generations will still be paying for the Iraq War and Bush Tax cuts, now they get Iran and trump tax cuts.
No I have no idea how to stop the insanity.
maplesaga@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 171d
Are you sure you are the majority? I can empathize with people who do care about suitability of finances but are stuck with people who dont.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 171d
No if I were the majority we would not be here. They don’t really teach finance and economics in public school. Balanced budgets haven’t been a popular platform since 2001. They stopped talking about it in 2012.
The average American can barely fucking read, so you better believe they can’t do math well. They certainly don’t deal in complex problems or multiple orders of effects.
Our education system failed so hard so fast that the majority of the population is blissfully ignorant on monetary and fiscal policy. I mean, these people don’t even understand the progressive tax code they’re under. They will pay taxes for 40 years of their life without fully understanding how a tax bracket works.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 171d
I cannot defend the population that cannot understand that a tariff is consumption tax. But like maybe 20% of us still do. And that’s like 70 million people.
maplesaga@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 171d
Well heres a far left economist who says they are basically a VAT tax. However he outlines that exporters do absorb some of the cost, but its mainly been US business absorbing the tariffs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJYqvK_oVN8
If you're a left leaning person isnt that good, cant the government now distribute that money and cut less programs, as corporations absorb much of the cost? Obviously the Trump tax cuts are where much of it will be going, but if a left leaning politician did it and removed those tax cuts wouldnt it be a net positive?
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 171d
VAT tax is basically a consumption tax with more steps. At the end of the day the cost gets transferred to the consumer who pays more for what they consume. I generally don't have a problem with a consumption tax, but with all the other taxes targeting the poor and relieving the rich, the tariffs are a step too far. They are not making that much money from the tariffs. common economic theory is when you tax spending, it slows spending and thus generates less revenues. if businesses go to cut costs to absorb production, that usually hits labor and thus consumers.
Now let's just say we did tariffs in a bubble which we used to do, yes tariffs are a valid way to balance competition and generate revenue. Consumption taxes are good because we probably should consume less. In this case they are being used to hoist up industrialists, and the revenues are not significant enough to deal with the current deficit.
So from a leftist perspective and the Neo-liberal perspective, absolutely not there's way better ways to raise money that hurst the poor less. Taxing land, or capital gains, or inheritance, or any of the numbers of ways large amounts of money changes hands, is a stronger leftist position. You would have to use tariffs precisely to help the working class. The nature of a tariff is to restrict international trade, so you'd also have to forsake your brother over seas who's also in the middle class. You're putting national interests in front of human interests which is not a very commie thing to do.
maplesaga@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 171d
Do you have any example of a democrat that is pushing for higher land taxes?
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 171d
Not really. I’m from a state that’s had an independent senator for the last 20 years and I’m focused on trying to send another one. I’m over the two party system. I’ve always been a fan of voting platforms over party.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 171d
TLDR tariffs have always existed to protect people like Elon Musk from having to compete with the hard working people of china. They are not beneficial to the working class unless you're only focused on your countries working class, and not the global working class. Since it is a consumption tax the burden is unevenly spread upon the poor and working class who are living on fixed budgets that don't have room for price changes. It's easily paid by the rich and disproportionately hurts the poor.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 0 pts · 170d
Oh shit guys, a YouTube video says tariffs are good. I guess that's that.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 170d
You really don't see the difference between this and Biden's infrastructure bill?
Are you for real?
maplesaga@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 170d
I do, I just see a lot of debt either way. Surely if you wanted balanced budgets at least one party would support them.
melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 172d
They might have been able to do it but Noem blew it all on personal advertising.
TronBronson@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 171d
She spent $200 Million I think, so only 0.1% of the amount of hand outs but ya.... that's the point, 200M here 20B there 200B over there, 4T over 10 years, every fucking day they are making entire banks worth of money disappear.
melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 170d
I've given up following "numbers" years ago. It's the state of decline that I now look for. This avoids the whole "can't see the forest for the trees" scenario. I agree with you though.