Is it better to protest against the MIC or infiltrating and disrupting from the inside?

11 points · 10 comments · view on lemmy.world

10 Comments

Trying2KnowMyself@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 167d (2 replies)

I became CEO of Lockheed Martin because I knew I could have more of a positive impact from inside the system than by trying to tear it down.

luthis@lemmy.nz · 2 pts · 167d (1 reply)

Is this a joke comment?

Trying2KnowMyself@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 167d

Why would I joke about being CEO of Lockheed Martin? If I am, that’s certainly for some 3 letter agency to determine and I’m not about to undermine those efforts.

AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 167d

Institutions aren’t the sum of their parts—their behavior is dependent on human participation, but is largely independent of the values or goals of the participating humans.

Unless you’ve identified a specific weakness and have a plan to exploit it before going in, your participation will probably benefit it more than any opportunistic harms you can do to it while participating.

the_abecedarian@piefed.social · 6 pts · 167d

it's impossible to change them from the inside. the capitalists own them and can fire you if you do anything to change them (and will reward you if you further their objectives)

luthis@lemmy.nz · 5 pts · 167d (1 reply)

Disrupt from the inside. Ideally with shrapnel

call_me_xale@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 167d

I advocate for rapid, unscheduled disassembly.

x3lz@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 131d

Please read "The matrix" on the hidden wiki @ http://zqktlwiuavvvqqt4ybvgvi7tyo4hjl5xgfuvpdf6otjiycgwqbym2qad.onion/wiki/The_Matrix note:requires Tor browser to access

pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 167d

Should people boycott against taking MIC jobs or take the jobs to prevent worse actors from taking them?

its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 167d

All joining will do is tie your success to them.