Prove you're a real penguin

612 points · 37 comments · view on lemmy.world

37 Comments

NotSteve_@piefed.ca · 110 pts · 171d (7 replies)

It is NOT portable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-( - Linux Torvalds (1991)

I've never heard of this "Linux" thing but it sounds like it doesn't support any of them 😤

Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 171d (5 replies)

I think Linux has implemented support for more things since then. He's just an upstanding guy.

markz@suppo.fi · 29 pts · 171d (3 replies)

Great guy, that Linux Torvaldx

Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 171d (1 reply)

He's the best.

Agent641@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 169d

I like him on The WAN Show

WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 171d

Enough with this politically-correct bullshit. It's Linuo or Linue.

RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip · 6 pts · 171d

I love his Linux Tech Tips show.

ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 169d

All it needed were people willing to port it to other architectures, which usually helps with open source projects.

Reygle@lemmy.world · 75 pts · 171d (3 replies)

Safe guess is never stop clicking

avidamoeba@lemmy.ca · 31 pts · 171d (2 replies)

There's one empty square.

Damage@feddit.it · 73 pts · 171d

it's just de-labeled, determined penguins can overcome that

Reygle@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 171d

Oh :)

tal@lemmy.today · 45 pts · 171d (1 reply)

https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/linux-takes-476-days-to-boot-on-an-ancient-intel-4004-cpu-cpu-precedes-the-os-by-20-years

Linux takes 4.76 days to boot on an ancient Intel 4004 CPU — CPU precedes the OS by 20 years

In essence, to bridge the hardware/software divide, the enthusiast emulated the more capable MIPS R3000 processor, which boasts the required C compiler support.

As long as they can talk to external storage, which I expect all of them can, all of them can probably emulate each other, so all of them can probably boot Linux.

davidgro@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 171d

The power of Turing completeness.

Technically it would be possible to boot Linux on a deck of Magic: The Gathering cards. During your opponent's turn.

potatopotato@sh.itjust.works · 30 pts · 171d (5 replies)

Well, at least one is an FPGA not an SOC...

fonix232@fedia.io · 27 pts · 171d

Well, nobody said that the images will only be of SoCs. The request was to select all SoCs that can boot mainline Linux.

In regular captcha you get requests that say "select all traffic lights". Guess what, not all squares will be traffic lights.

WolfLink@sh.itjust.works · 15 pts · 171d (1 reply)

Implement an SOC on the FPGA and boot away!

potatopotato@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 170d

I assumed the Spartan 6 didn't have enough LEs to run a microblaze with MMU, but the pictured one is a 75kLUT part so you could probably fit at least a simple dual core design!

aion@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 171d (1 reply)

But you can put a MicroBlaze in there and boot Linux.

potatopotato@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 170d

So it turns out you can, see my other post, I stand corrected

DeltaWingDragon@sh.itjust.works · 17 pts · 171d

Replace Linux with NetBSD, and then I'll just put my entire hand on the touchscreen

Probably would also work with Linux

dragnucs@lemmy.ml · 11 pts · 171d (3 replies)

Isn't it all of them?

grue@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 171d (2 replies)

Isn't it none of them, because they all want special-snowflake configurations that are supported by the vendor and not upstreamed to "mainline?"

Tja@programming.dev · 4 pts · 171d (1 reply)

There's an Intel one in there...

grue@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 171d

Yeah, but it's for a PXA255 XScale (ARM) processor, not x86. I'm trying to figure out if it requires any binary blobs or other non-mainline tweaks for Linux to work on it, but haven't found a definitive answer yet.

socsa@piefed.social · 11 pts · 171d

What is our cutoff for "mainline?"

MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 171d

Now do RISC.

ColdWater@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 171d (1 reply)

Everything except mediatek

possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 171d

Unless you are talking about network hardware

theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 171d (2 replies)

rk3399 from experience

ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 171d (1 reply)

Ohhh, there's a fork for that.

theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 171d

rk3399 has been on mainline for a good while, no? I think rk3588 is too at this point, even.

sepi@piefed.social · 6 pts · 171d

what the fuck bro

OpenStars@piefed.social · 6 pts · 171d

The purity testing is real...😭

bibbasa@piefed.social · 3 pts · 171d

gotta go rockchip, no?

Nils@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 171d

I was quite successful with Yocto Project for the SoCs I use.

pokexpert30@jlai.lu · 1 pts · 170d

Probably the Motorola, otherwise none