So basically any effort a single individual has done and can do in the future to reduce their footprint has been undone by 100x. Why are we even bothering?
We don't have the time to vote every 2-4 years and pray we get a decent candidate that will at least not set us back further. We need to learn and organize.
Yeah i do agree that it should be still done, even if just to keep ones surroundings cleaner, just the pretending that it has a notable impact is disingenuous, kinda annoying and misdirects attention from things that can have at least some impact, aka yeah voting.
the intention of the carbon footprint was to shift blame away from industrial polluters to individuals like recycling efforts shifted the onus away from beverage makers to individuals; adam ruins everything did an episode on it.
Most of the described ecological and environmental damage is local to the regions being bombed as opposed to global impacts to air and oceans. Though there is some of that too.
I think it's safe to say that this unfolding disaster touches almost every aspect of life though, and it's all to diatract from Trump (& co) raping girls.
14 Comments
Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org · 26 pts · 190d
So basically any effort a single individual has done and can do in the future to reduce their footprint has been undone by 100x. Why are we even bothering?
pwnicholson@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 190d
I feel that.
But just to say it: Because it's still the right thing to do, and if we didn't, it would just be that much worse.
There's no denying the best thing people can do for the planet isn't recycling, etc - it's voting.
JustJack23@slrpnk.net · 6 pts · 190d
Of course a lemmy.world can't conceve of a political activity different from voting.
Let me help you there: read
orc_princess@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 190d
We don't have the time to vote every 2-4 years and pray we get a decent candidate that will at least not set us back further. We need to learn and organize.
pwnicholson@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 190d
Oh, I'm not saying voting is the only thing we can do. Not by a long shot. It's just the most impactful.
Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org · 3 pts · 190d
Yeah i do agree that it should be still done, even if just to keep ones surroundings cleaner, just the pretending that it has a notable impact is disingenuous, kinda annoying and misdirects attention from things that can have at least some impact, aka yeah voting.
eldavi@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 190d
the intention of the carbon footprint was to shift blame away from industrial polluters to individuals like recycling efforts shifted the onus away from beverage makers to individuals; adam ruins everything did an episode on it.
pulsewidth@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 190d
Most of the described ecological and environmental damage is local to the regions being bombed as opposed to global impacts to air and oceans. Though there is some of that too.
I think it's safe to say that this unfolding disaster touches almost every aspect of life though, and it's all to diatract from Trump (& co) raping girls.
MrSulu@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 190d
Luckily, many Americans don't believe in it so it can't harm them........... /s
MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 190d
Just one of the largest super tankers, carries as much oil as was leaked in the horizon disaster.
fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 190d
The world burns a super tanker worth of oil about every 20 minutes....
minorkeys@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 190d
I mean Russian oil depos have been set ablaze for 5 years now and I've yet to see an environment impact report on it.
fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 190d
In general, climate change (warming) has increased substantially over the last few years...
Inertia is a sumbitch.
humanspiral@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 190d
They exist. They are generally used to blame Russia for defending itself even if its the usual side that doesn't want peace.