c/lemmyshitpost · by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 168djournalist? what is your purpose? https://social.coop/@fraggle/116242774957677026 415 points · 11 comments · view on lemmy.world
11 Comments
First_Thunder@lemmy.zip · 91 pts · 168d
I mean, Banksy is actually a challenge, the Epstein files are just evident
Microw@piefed.zip · 18 pts · 168d
Not really, his name has been rumoured to be/somewhat known to be that for years now
Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.org · 47 pts · 168d
Reuters is still reporting on the epstein files, so what's wrong?
GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world · 39 pts · 168d
OP has the attention span of a mosquito at a funeral
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 168d
Only one thing at a time!
Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 167d
Why find Banksy, a guy doing good? Why not do more about Epstein?
Retail4068@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 168d
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-house-panel-subpoenas-attorney-general-bondi-epstein-probe-2026-03-17/
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 168d
The purpose of a modern journalist is to maintain the rule of the oligarchy.
oneser@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 166d
This is such a lame take. Like there are a shitload of legitimately fantastic community investigative journalists fighting to make a difference, but you'd rather shit on them too because Rupert Murdoch exists.
theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 168d
Shouldn't have exposed someone who doesn't want to be exposed like this even though its basically already known.
Gladaed@feddit.org · 4 pts · 168d
You know people don't have to laser focus on that one thing but spit their attention as a society and get more done that way?
What of merit could a new Epstein related article have? They have been virtually the same for almost a decade.