optimal amount of syrup

493 points · 53 comments · view on lemmy.world

53 Comments

gressen@lemmy.zip · 79 pts · 147d (16 replies)

Except the 17 square version holds less syrup than the 16 square version because you need to reduce the size of the squares to fit more of them.

CaptDust@sh.itjust.works · 61 pts · 147d (14 replies)

If you take the original 16 squares and reduce them each in half, you can have 32 squares. Doctorate now, please.

xthexder@l.sw0.com · 42 pts · 147d (12 replies)

If the squares are half the size, you get 4x the number of squares, assuming you're measuring side length and not area.

CaptDust@sh.itjust.works · 39 pts · 147d (11 replies)

Oh hey sorry I didn't know you went to school for this shit. Fine. you make the waffles.

deranger@sh.itjust.works · 22 pts · 147d (7 replies)

One square is the optimal waffle if you’re optimizing for syrup volume alone.

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus · 7 pts · 147d

I will put you to work testing this theory.

Proceed with waffle preparation and delivery, I'll be waiting, and will provide my own syrup. Please note all waffles are to be gluten-free, as my body hates me and the things I enjoy.

moody@lemmings.world · 5 pts · 147d (5 replies)

If you serve the syrup in a cup, then the syrup to waffle ratio is infinite.

bumblefumble@mander.xyz · 5 pts · 147d (2 replies)

I post this comment quite often, but a number divided by zero is not infinity, so the syrup to waffle ratio would actually be undefined.

TheTetrapod@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 147d

Fine, as the quantity of waffle approaches zero, the syrup to waffle ratio approaches infinity.

FishFace@piefed.social · 3 pts · 147d

Give this man a medal

angrystego@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 147d

Why even have a waffle at all, let's drink the syrup!

xthexder@l.sw0.com · 14 pts · 147d (2 replies)

I should put "Bachelor's in Waffleology" on my resume

OpenStars@piefed.social · 4 pts · 147d

Dr. Waffleologist!

MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 147d

Keep it up and you'll be the next Waffle King!

arcine@jlai.lu · 4 pts · 146d

You can take this to the limit and make a waffle with infinitely many holes, each infinitely small !

It's just crepes.

WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world · 44 pts · 147d

For those who didn't know you can just pour as much syrup as you like, regardless of the square count.

stan_stanminson@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 54 pts · 147d (7 replies)

Why we don't make one giant square to hold even more syrup?

yuriRO@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 26 pts · 147d

The Wa

nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz · 19 pts · 147d

Because then it gets too soggy in the middle. The magic of the waffle is that the tops of the square dividers stay mostly dry until you start cutting into them. So you get freshly syruped waffle throughout the eating process.

Redjard@reddthat.com · 9 pts · 147d

can make it round so the syrup spreads more evenly from the center.

Oops you made pancakes

robyn@lemmy.org · 9 pts · 147d

The evil waffle

ExtremeUnicorn@feddit.org · 9 pts · 147d

This goes to 17 sqares!

ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 147d

What you want is infinite squares, so you get infinite crispy edges

AlreadyDefederated@midwest.social · 2 pts · 147d

Or - here's a radical idea -

EAT A SECOND FUCKING WAFFLE

elbucho@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 147d

I wonder if John Bidwell is haunted by his discovery. I know I would be. That shit is cursed as fuck.

palmtrees2309@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 147d (3 replies)

Aren't Hexagons the bestagon for tiling a plane for most holding capacity while reducing the "walls" than any shape?

Zwiebel@feddit.org · 23 pts · 147d

This here is just the best known solution to packing 17 squares specifically

FishFace@piefed.social · 4 pts · 147d

The honeycomb theorem is actually better than that: there isn't any way to divide up the plane with equal-area shapes (even if it's not a tiling in the sense of having any pattern) it won't be better than hexagons.

But that video can die in a fire!

Landless2029@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 147d

This was my first thought.

A circle filled with hexagons!

unnamedau@lemmy.ca · 19 pts · 147d (1 reply)

on one hand, i want a 17-square waffle maker. on the other hand i think i would get brutally murdered by anyone i ever tried to make waffles for

GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone · 15 pts · 147d

If they don't appreciate the 17-square waffle, they don't deserve it.

Etterra@discuss.online · 17 pts · 147d (7 replies)

I keep telling people that you can make nice, even months if you just have 13 of them but nooooo, 13 is a prime number, you can't divide it by 2, 3, 4, or 6! Boo fucking hoo, I want every month in the year to start on the same day of the week.

thessnake03@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 147d (1 reply)

Found Henry Ford's account

Etterra@discuss.online · 2 pts · 147d

Hey, fuck that racist bastard. I just hate trying to remember his many days are in a month because the current system is stupid.

ExtremeUnicorn@feddit.org · 3 pts · 147d (4 replies)

Doesn't add up, either. Plus, you still have leap years and seconds.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 147d (3 replies)

yes it does. 13 even months with one extra day for new years

ExtremeUnicorn@feddit.org · 4 pts · 147d (2 replies)

So... It doesn't add up.

Etterra@discuss.online · 2 pts · 147d

You tack the extra time on the end, shifting what day of the week the 1st falls on for the rest of the year. Instead of the end of February, which is just the most random fucking choice that I can only figure was determined because the calendar was set centuries before we had lightbulbs.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 147d

you haven't looked at the calendar. it works.

LodeMike@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 147d

I don't think waffle enjoyers want one more square in the same waffle, they want a specific shape and syrup/butter ratio per square. This waffle bricks that with its thick sections.

kozy138@slrpnk.net · 5 pts · 147d

Shapes are dumb.

enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 147d (3 replies)

TIL the shape in waffle is to hold syrup.

angrystego@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 147d (2 replies)

It holds blueberries very well too!

enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 147d (1 reply)

if the bottom part of the waffle is the inverted shape of the top one, it should fit another waffle. To properly stack them

angrystego@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 147d

But it's not, so you need blueberries to be able to stack waffles reliably.

MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 147d (1 reply)

How about 25?

 _ _ _ _ _
|_|_|_|_|_|
|_|_|_|_|_|
|_|_|_|_|_|
|_|_|_|_|_|
|_|_|_|_|_|
shane@feddit.nl · 3 pts · 146d

If you look at the image on the left you'll see that 5 of the smaller squares won't fit in the big one.

Furbag@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 147d

This image is cropped so poorly. I've seen the uncropped version recently too...

massive_bereavement@fedia.io · 2 pts · 147d

This ruined my day.

YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 147d

I need to find this waffle iron!

Jarix@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 146d

Why would do this?

smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works · -1 pts · 147d

Great. Now cut that into 8 equal bites without spilling any syrup.

Fuckin' dumbass. THIS is what is meant by "book smart but not street smart".