It's Called Fog Panther. Flathub: FogPanther Claims to be written in GTK4. Looks like a modified GIMP. Made by a business consulting firm, looks sketchy to me.
It's Called Fog Panther. Flathub: FogPanther Claims to be written in GTK4. Looks like a modified GIMP. Made by a business consulting firm, looks sketchy to me.
22 Comments
lukecooperatus@lemmy.ml · 42 pts · 153d
I think OP is referring to Fog Panther, I just saw this yesterday in Flathub: https://flathub.org/en-GB/apps/com.fogpanther.FogPanther. It definitely appears to be some jackass selling a blatant GIMP clone.
Kirk@startrek.website · 8 pts · 153d
Honestly? I would probably pay for a GIMP clone that has a photoshop-like UI and can be installed via flatpak. $70 is a little high but if it was $20 and received regular updates?
warmaster@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 153d
Absolutely, and Photogimp is not enough.
Kirk@startrek.website · 3 pts · 153d
No Photogimp is not enough lol
jackal@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 153d
Yes. The only thing stopping me using GIMP is the UI. I'd pay for GIMP with a better UI straight away.
LiveLM@lemmy.zip · 14 pts · 153d
AFAIK GIMP only gained GTK 3 support on Nov 2024 and they're still working on GTK 4.
If this is really GTK 4, they might have forked from GIMP for a while now.
There's chances this really is a brand new UI on top of GIMP as opposed to just being a layout change and rename, but I guess someone would have to poke at it further to confirm.
Reisen@sh.itjust.works · 13 pts · 153d
the "art" looks very ai as well and given it's only a single layer it certainly is not made in this software or by the person making this software
thingsiplay@lemmy.ml · 16 pts · 153d
The program Fog Panther (if this it the program the OP is referring to) was already rejected for using (entirely?) Ai: https://github.com/flathub/flathub/pull/8077 . 3 weeks ago they closed it with conclusion:
CurbCuts@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 153d
The lack of layers in the layer panal is suspious.
thingsiplay@lemmy.ml · 6 pts · 153d
Also adding the fact the image is a typical Ai generated size of max 1024 x 1024 (slightly lower on one side, probably watermark removed) and the randomized image names indicate a web download. Very Amogus.
QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 153d
Ew, gross. I'd rather GIMP myself.
ardorhb@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 153d
Looks very sketchy but I'm not to sure if it really is GIMP. It's code is old and complex changing it to look like in the screenshot would be a big project on itself.
Kirk@startrek.website · 2 pts · 153d
what is it
db2@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 153d
April 1st among other things.
pr06lefs@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 153d
inkscape? which is free
Cris_Color@piefed.world · 5 pts · 153d
Gimp is a rasterized editor and inkscape is a vector editor. Both have limited functionality within the other category of graphics if I'm not mistaken but theyre not the same kind of tool
warmaster@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 153d
Is Photoshop the same as Illustrator?
pr06lefs@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 153d
you can tell the difference because of the names
warmaster@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 153d
Oh so Inkscape must have a different purpose than Gimp, right?
0xd34d@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 153d
I think you are right, this looks just like inkscape to me.
Cris_Color@piefed.world · 2 pts · 153d
While the styling looks vaguely similar to inkscape none of the toolbars or anything have the correct tool contents to be inkscape
0xd34d@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 151d
Yeah you are definitely correct. The panels and layout look very similar but the tools not so much.
Lemmchen@feddit.org · 1 pts · 153d
thingsiplay@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 153d