AI slop? The text looks a bit wonky and the ISBN is invalid. It's either 978-0220331132 or 978-0220331432, I can't really tell but neither is valid. Besides, the last digit looks like it's about to fall off.
But still, the book's physical condition itself looks realistic. Look at the bottom left corner or the spine for example, there are lots of tiny defects a real book would have. So the image and therefore the cover must both be real.
Yet look at the ridges on the spine! You can't (easily) achieve this with regular printing paper. It has to be a real paper book cover. But there's no way anyone would AI generate the fucking ISBN bar code and sell it like this, is there? After all, I can't see any pages either though which indicates the cover is standalone.
Yeah, everything else has an explanation, but k is nowhere near x on a keyboard and it is used correctly multiple times. The description is also generic af and doesn't tell you anything about the book.
I think we're referring to different words. Look at the text in the back (which is apparently called "blurb") - the p is not closed and if it were closed, it would be way too "big".
You are right about the x having become a k on the front though, I didn't spot that.
31 Comments
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de · 46 pts · 137d
AI slop? The text looks a bit wonky and the ISBN is invalid. It's either 978-0220331132 or 978-0220331432, I can't really tell but neither is valid. Besides, the last digit looks like it's about to fall off.
But still, the book's physical condition itself looks realistic. Look at the bottom left corner or the spine for example, there are lots of tiny defects a real book would have. So the image and therefore the cover must both be real.
Yet look at the ridges on the spine! You can't (easily) achieve this with regular printing paper. It has to be a real paper book cover. But there's no way anyone would AI generate the fucking ISBN bar code and sell it like this, is there? After all, I can't see any pages either though which indicates the cover is standalone.
I'm confused.
rumschlumpel@feddit.org · 23 pts · 137d
Or maybe it's a non-AI fake. Maybe made using traditional image-editing software, maybe an arts-and-crafts project.
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de · 12 pts · 137d
That doesn't explain the wonky looking p in the word "exploring" though.
Also I'm fairly certain you live in Germany which means it's 4 am when you replied. Go to sleep!
Leonixster@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 11 pts · 137d
It's not the P that looks wonky, it's the fact that it says "ekploring". It's a very AI type of error for an angled X to be turned into a K instead
TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 137d
Yeah, everything else has an explanation, but k is nowhere near x on a keyboard and it is used correctly multiple times. The description is also generic af and doesn't tell you anything about the book.
GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 137d
It says "ekpression" on the front cover side, but exploring on the back cover has a p with an unclosed loop on it
yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 137d
I think we're referring to different words. Look at the text in the back (which is apparently called "blurb") - the p is not closed and if it were closed, it would be way too "big".
You are right about the x having become a k on the front though, I didn't spot that.
Leonixster@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 137d
Oh yeah, mb, I was too sleepy when I made that comment lol
Zelaf@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 137d
Maybe poor image compression?
And it is 6 now, I should def be asleep
laserm@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 137d
I don't know I just found it on the internet and I didn't overthink it so much ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜
Tiger_Man_@szmer.info · 29 pts · 137d
darvit@lemmy.darvit.nl · 4 pts · 136d
Nowadays you would replace C with Rust
HexaBack@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 136d
what would learning BASIC make you
Tiger_Man_@szmer.info · 1 pts · 136d
as a c femboy i disagree
ignotum@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 137d
Unique? Being a femboy is mainstream now, femboys are a dime a dozen, you'll be just another femdrop in the fembocean
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 137d
I'd ask "when will chuds gatekeep being a femboy", but I guess they already do.
ignotum@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 137d
You're only a femboy if you were raised in the femboy-region of France, otherwise you're just a sparkling boy
ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 136d
It's more like they get extremely angry, when a femboy isn't racist and transphobic.
Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 9 pts · 137d
i want those clothes.
AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 136d
https://xkcd.com/264/
Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 136d
idont get it.... still want those softie clothes tho
AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 136d
mostly the part 4, its just very.. inspirational? maybe not the right word but idk how to describe
espurr@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 136d
What happens if you age out of being a femboy? What are you then?
AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 136d
You become a femman
Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org · 3 pts · 135d
And then you will become addicted to spice and religious propaganda sewn into your culture for hundreds of years.
humorlessrepost@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 136d
The opposite of a hydwohomie.
espurr@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 135d
That doesn't sound kawaii...
Gladaed@feddit.org · 4 pts · 135d
According to popular, former fem boy finnster they all come out as trans after upto like 6 years.
Please, do feel free to provide a counter example.
espurr@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 135d
Can't really think of a counter example, interesting conjecture indeed!
festnt@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 136d
a trans girl
magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 136d
Who says you have to age out?