To feed your food preferences:
AI: ~560–800 Billion Liters Annual usage
Beef: ~4,387 Trillion Liters (for feed alone)
AI: Minimal land use
Beef: 44% of global habitable land
AI: ~20,400 tons CO2 (per large model)
Beef: ~14.5% of all global emissions
AI: Electronic waste, local heat islands
Beef: Methane, manure runoff, "dead zones"
A single quarter-pound beef burger requires between 40 and 70 gallons of surface/groundwater
A heavy AI user (50 queries/day for a year) consumes roughly 14 to 48 gallons of water annually
Beef driven industrial agriculture is the #1 driver of global deforestation. In the Amazon, cattle ranching is responsible for at least 75% of forest loss. This is causing ecological collapse.
All this to torture cows. Fucking stop it. Stop it NOW.
35 Comments
queermunist@lemmy.ml · 28 pts · 159d
AI gives workers PTSD by forcing them to review horrific images.
Beef gives workers PTSD by forcing them to kill, over and over.
umbrella@lemmy.ml · 12 pts · 158d
faintwhenfree@lemmus.org · 6 pts · 158d
Você é brasileiro?
umbrella@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 158d
pineapple@lemmy.ml · 10 pts · 158d
I just want people to stop caring about water usage as a metric for environmental destruction by just listing an amount in liters. Its so much more complicated than that. What water are they using? Is it ultra clean or brown water? Where are they sourcing the water from? Are they taking it from a pretine natural spring in a rainforest or are they taking it from the ocean?
There are just so many veriables that its almost never an apples to apples comparison.
Carbon emmissions, detriment to workers and other things like that are much better metrics. I just hate when people say "did you know you empty a kajillion olympic sized swimming pools with every ai queory?"
hamid@crazypeople.online · 9 pts · 158d
Water where I live is a non renewable resource and is being drained from ancient aquifers at an alarming rate. Once it is gone we essentially have to leave this entire region and it is being drained for ranching and growing alfalfa.
pineapple@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 157d
Thats a pretty big yikes.
msage@programming.dev · 1 pts · 157d
Cali?
usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 158d
Water usage for beef's cattle feed in the US at least is quite often in water scarce areas
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=wffdocs
pineapple@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 158d
Thank you, that is an interesting point that actually shows the environmental destruction caused by beefs water usage.
Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online · 4 pts · 158d
I want people to stop assuming that simplified framing of a complex issue is the whole story.
Volume of water is an easy metric for people to understand. When people talk about wasting water they might mean literally moving water out of its water shed, like groundwater wells being pumped dry or they might also be thinking of the massive amounts of energy required to move and potentially treat that water and the (heat, nutrient) pollution the used water carries.
These impacts are not universal and which ones apply in which locations, and the impact they have will vary widely. So volume of water is an easy way to make it easier to understand and 'smooth' out the variations.
deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz · 4 pts · 158d
Data centres don't fill local waterways with nitrates either.
november@piefed.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 158d
Preaching to the choir.
hamid@crazypeople.online · 7 pts · 158d
This landed on the all and local feeds of one of the largest lemmy instances for over a day, I think it served its purpose
dessalines@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 157d
The amount of land use is staggering also:
I have a ton of similar vegan infographics. If you want I could make a
vegan_infographicscommunity on your server.NahMarcas@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 159d
This make me almost feel good with AI
Now seriously leaving meat is all advantages with general health
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · -12 pts · 159d
I don’t order my beef from Amazon though.
usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml · 16 pts · 159d
Beef is exported from Brazil to the rest of the world
RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 158d
As an Australian I could argue my beef isnt from Brazil. I don't really eat it because afaik it's the worst of all the meats, but it's definitely local produce.
usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 158d
Australia also has plenty of deforestation problems from the beef industry. The deforestation is by no means exclusive to Brazil
The deforestation on farms that ‘people don’t even know’ is happening
RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 158d
That's fair, there's plenty of deforestation in Australia for a bunch of stupid shit, even illegal logging gets tolerated.
lookingforanALFpolycule@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 158d
Even if your flesh isn’t shipped from there, the feed for the animals you kill will have been.
pinto@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 158d
The truth is that this poster is obnoxious and posts obvious flame bait.
They get ratioed on almost everything they post because no one buys what they are selling.
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · -1 pts · 158d
My instance doesn’t display downvotes so I don’t see it if that’s true.
Aristotelis@lemmy.ml · -26 pts · 159d
Beef can't be replaced by any other food.
stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net · 26 pts · 159d
How so?
Besides all the vegans, vegetarians, and people who can't afford or don't have access to beef, there are roughly 1.2 billion Hindus in the world, most of whom don't eat beef for religious reasons.
I don't see how beef can be irreplaceable when literally billions of people don't eat beef and are perfectly healthy without it.
boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net · 25 pts · 159d
Lol
hamid@crazypeople.online · 20 pts · 159d
Beef is fucking poison for your body and the planet.
lobut@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 159d
We have many alternatives to meat that are delicious and satiating. It's one of the best things we can do for the planet. It's not easy for everyone to easily cut themselves off from eating meat but it would be great if people start reducing it.
catscape@lemmy.ml · 15 pts · 159d
our planet can't be replaced either, so which is more important to you?
Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone · 11 pts · 159d
Cows eat plants, which becomes beef, so categorically false.
logi@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 159d
We can't digest the grasses that cows do with their 4 stomachs and rumination, so that argument is bull. But of course you're right that beef can replaced. We'll just have to hit the legumes and plants that we can actually digest.
Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 159d
If only there was some other way of preparing food making it more digestible and its nutrients more available without us needing 4 stomachs 🤔
logi@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 158d
Of course there is. I'm just saying that the existence of cows doesn't prove anything, since they are a different organism from us with different capabilities, like digesting things that we can't. Using bullshit arguments doesn't help whatever cause you think you're helping.
Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 157d
My point was more about the plants than the cows, any nutrient in beef being ultimately derived from plants. And we may not have 4 stomachs but have other ways of accessing those nutrients. Maybe that clarifies somewhat 🤷🏼
Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online · 8 pts · 158d
It is hard to replicate the cruelty of the dairy/beef industry, I'll give you that.
nevyn@veganism.social · 4 pts · 158d
@Aristotelis @hamid old school trolling