We'll see. This court decision will determine if distress codes are destruction of evidence, which is different, but I don't think it's much of a stretch to think they'd extend that to wiping your phone before traveling too. Why not? They hate you.
The only real defense would be having a burner, it'd break too many things to make it illegal.
Do they get to have showers? Do they get to wash their clothes? Do they get to have toilets, or should they be forced to shit in holes? And how many weeks and months do they live in their tents? Rebuilding after a disaster takes a long time.
You sound like someone that thinks this will never happen to you, and so you don't care if it happens to other people.
Also, how does that work? Can’t they legally force you to enter your password too?
No, because forcing someone to enter a password is "compelled speech" and against the 1st Amendment. It's also testimonial, which means compelling that speech would also be self incrimination, which is against the 5th Amendment.
Don't ask me why forcing someone to make a hand gesture is not also compelled speech and not testimonial. The Constitution is mostly nonsense being interpreted by life appointed morons who interpret things however they like.
"If your house is hit by a tornado, you should be forced to live in the wreckage and not be given temporary shelter somewhere else while it is being fixed. "
And that's part of my point: fine fabrics would be worn by wealthy merchants and aristocrats and mercenaries, everyone else gets whatever fabric they can afford. At no point in history did we get to wear fine anything.
You don't think they'll drag such a tax through the court system? Our enemies don't want any restraints on businesses, anything we try to do will be fought.
I don't think it would be difficult to outright forbid self-checkout at all, actually.
There's a difference between enforcing laws on individuals and enforcing laws on businesses. Businesses can't exactly run and hide, if they're using self-checkout they're going to get found out. That's distinct from something like the drug trade, which is all underground and hidden.
Investing in the future costs money and lowers our quarterly profits, just sell it off so the investors get bigger numbers immediately.
And remember: markets are efficient 🤡
Yeah, it's for liver health, but also that rollercoaster effect can be mitigated by taking a smaller sublingual dose multiple times a day.
Except horses aren't allowed to vote, so actually, it's nothing like that.
This concept was invented by rich people who were afraid that the majority would vote to take away their wealth and property.
Just saying.
NO!
You're supposed to let the pill melt under your tongue, not wash it down with a glass of water.
💕
We'll see. This court decision will determine if distress codes are destruction of evidence, which is different, but I don't think it's much of a stretch to think they'd extend that to wiping your phone before traveling too. Why not? They hate you.
The only real defense would be having a burner, it'd break too many things to make it illegal.
They're testing that in court right now. That might be "destruction of evidence" after all.
Do they get to have showers? Do they get to wash their clothes? Do they get to have toilets, or should they be forced to shit in holes? And how many weeks and months do they live in their tents? Rebuilding after a disaster takes a long time.
You sound like someone that thinks this will never happen to you, and so you don't care if it happens to other people.
I hope you have to live in a tent someday, so you can understand what a fucking horrible idea this is.
No, because forcing someone to enter a password is "compelled speech" and against the 1st Amendment. It's also testimonial, which means compelling that speech would also be self incrimination, which is against the 5th Amendment.
Don't ask me why forcing someone to make a hand gesture is not also compelled speech and not testimonial. The Constitution is mostly nonsense being interpreted by life appointed morons who interpret things however they like.
"If your house is hit by a tornado, you should be forced to live in the wreckage and not be given temporary shelter somewhere else while it is being fixed. "
And that's part of my point: fine fabrics would be worn by wealthy merchants and aristocrats and mercenaries, everyone else gets whatever fabric they can afford. At no point in history did we get to wear fine anything.
Most hand-made clothing was also shoddy. It just had to be functional and durable, it didn't have to look or feel good.
Skilled work? Absolutely. Was it fine skilled work, though? Not really. It was rough skilled work.
I'm not under the impression that the rest of us could ever afford fine skilled work.
Sure, I'm just saying, this wouldn't be a hard law to enforce.
You don't think they'll drag such a tax through the court system? Our enemies don't want any restraints on businesses, anything we try to do will be fought.
Well. Discounting items in self-checkout is actually a tax on the company for using self-checkout.
I don't think it would be difficult to outright forbid self-checkout at all, actually.
There's a difference between enforcing laws on individuals and enforcing laws on businesses. Businesses can't exactly run and hide, if they're using self-checkout they're going to get found out. That's distinct from something like the drug trade, which is all underground and hidden.
Getting hit by a car was the first domino to me eventually starting hrt.
Because they don't believe in a state solution to capitalism, corporations and consumerism.
Solar punk without anarchism is just China.